Skip to main content
Log in

The Use of a Co-operative Student Model of Learner Characteristics to Configure a Multimedia Application

  • Published:
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes an investigation into the ways in which learning using a multimedia application can be supported and enhanced by means of a simple co-operative student model of learner characteristics. This paper reports the design, implementation and evaluation of an individually configurable multimedia learning application, based upon such a model.

A multimedia learning application was developed that presented information differentially based upon the individual characteristics of learners, held in the student model. The characteristics employed in the model were language level, cognitive style, task and question levels, and help level. Small groups of learners followed the multimedia course in learning centres located in colleges in the UK. A Grounded Theory study was carried out in order to understand the many and complex interactions that took place between learners, tutors and the learning environment.

Stages in the Grounded Theory method are described and some qualitative data is presented. It was possible to conclude from these, that the quality of learning for individuals was improved by the use of the co-operative student model. Quantitative data is presented to support this view and where possible, to relate performance on the multimedia learning application to the student model configuration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barker, T.: 2001, The use of a co-operative student model of learner characteristics to configure a multimedia application: Supporting information and data. http://homepages. feis.herts.ac.uk/~comqtb/index.html.

  • Barker, T.: 1999, The use of a student model in a multimedia application to configure learning, Technical Report No. 344, Department of Computer Science, University of Hertfordshire, August, 1999.

  • Barker, T.: 1998, Creating Horizon multimedia learning applications to support students with learning difficulties and disabilities. Proceedings of Euro Education 98 Conference, Aalborg, Denmark, 27–29 May, pp. 101–110.

  • Barker, T., Jones, S., Britton, C. and Messer, D. J.: 1997, The development of task-based differentiated learning materials for students with learning difficulties and/or disabilities. Proceedings of CAL-97 conference, University of Exeter, March, pp. 37–41.

  • Barker, T., Jones, S., Britton, C. and Messer, D. J.: 1999a, Investigation into the effect of Language on Performance in a Multimedia Food Studies Application. Proceedings of Interact 99 conference, Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh, September, pp. 648–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, T., Jones, S., Britton, C. and Messer, D. J.: 1999b, Report of a pilot study of an individually configurable multimedia learning prototype based on a cooperative student model of learner characteristics. Presented at ALT-C99, University of Bristol, September 1999 also Technical Report No. 338, Department of Computer Science, University of Hertfordshire, August, 1999.

  • Barker, T., Jones, S., Britton, C. and Messer, D. J.: 2000, Individual Cognitive Style and Performance in a Multimedia Learning Application, Euro Education 2000 Conference, Aalborg, Denmark, 8–10 February, 2000, also Technical Report No. 325, University of Hertfordshire, Division of Computer Science, January, 1999.

  • Barron, A. and Atkins, D.: 1994, Audio instruction in multimedia education: Is textual redundancy important? Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 3, 295–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B. S.: 1956, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Book 1, Cognitive Domain, David McKay Company, Inc. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, C., Linton, F. and Bell, B.: 1997, Using evaluation in the design of an intelligent tutoring system. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 8(2), 235–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bormuth, J. R.: 1968, Cloze Test Readability: Criterial reference scores, Journal of Educational Measurement 5(3), 189–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusilovsky, P.: 1996, Methods and techniques in adaptive hypermedia. User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction 6(2–3), 87–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckner, K. and Morss, K.: 1999, The importance of task appropriateness in computersupported collaborative learning, Association for Learning Technology Journal 7(1), 33–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, S. and Smith, M.: 1997, A pair of student models to encourage collaboration. Proceedings of the Sixth international Conference UM97, Chia Laguna, Italy, June 2–5, 339–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, S., Brna, P. and Pain, H.: 1995, Extending the scope of the student model. User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction 5(10), 45–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvani, A., Sorzlot, P. and Varisco, B. M.: 1997, Inter-university cooperative learning: an exploratory study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 13, 271–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chou, C. and Lin, H.: 1998, The effect of navigation map types and cognitive styles on learners' performance in a computer-networked hypertext learning system. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 7(2/3), 151–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Brown, J. S. and Newman, S. E.: 1989, Cognitive apprenticeship: teaching the crafts of reading, writing and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (ed.) Cognition and instruction: issues and agendas. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

  • Connell, M. L.: 1997, AI or IA: The choice is yours. Educational Technology Review 7, 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, G.: 1993, A perspective on learning for education systems, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 9, 229–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, G.: 1998, Artificial intelligence in education: an exploration, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 14(4), 252–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Diana, I. P. F. and van der Heiden, G.: 1994, Electronic study books and learning style.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 10(2), 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dix, A. J., Finlay, J. E., Abowd, G. D. and Beale, R.: 1998, Human-Computer Interaction. Prentice Hall, Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Draper, S.: 1997, Prospects for summative evaluation of CAL in higher education. Association for Learning Technology Journal 5(1), 33–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, G. and Riding, R. J.: 1993, The effect of cognitive styles and position of prose passage title on recall. Educational Psychology 13, 385–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. J.: 1981, Styles of learning and teaching: an integrated outline of educational psychology for students, teachers and lecturers. Chichester, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felder, R. M. and Brent, R.: 1994, Cooperative Learning in Technical Courses: Procedures, Pitfalls and Payoffs. NSFDUE Grant DUE-9354379, October, 1994.

  • Glaser, B. and Strauss, A.: 1967, The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabinger, S., Dunlap, J. C., Duffield, J. A.: 1997, Rich environments for active learning in action: problem-based learning. Association for Learning Technology Journal 5(2), 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groat, A. and Musson, T.: 1995, Learning styles: individualizing computer-based learning environments. Association for Learning Technology Journal 3(2), 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunn, C.: 1997, CAL evaluation: future directions. Association for Learning Technology Journal, 5(1), 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzdial, M. and Kehoe, C.: 1998, Apprenticeship-based learning environments: A principled approach to providing software-realized scaffolding through hypermedia, Journal of Interactive Learning Research 9(3/4), 289–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M. H.: 1992, What's wrong with ethnography? Routledge, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartley, J. R.: 1998, Guest Editorial: CAL and AI–a time for rapprochement? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 14(4), 249–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P., Jacobs, S. and Brown, S.: 1997, Learning Styles and CAL design: a model for the future. Active Learning 7, December, 9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenworthy, N.W.: 1993, When Johnny Can't Read: Multimedia Design Strategies to Accommodate Poor Readers. Journal of Instructional Delivery Systems, Winter, 27–30.

  • King, A.: 1993, From sage on the stage to guide on the side. College Teaching 41(1), 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D.: 1984, Experiential Learning. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. and Fry, R.: 1975, Towards an applied theory of experiential learning. In: C. Cooper (ed.) Theories of Group Processes. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwok,M. and Jones, C.: 1995, Catering for different learning styles. Association for Learning Technology Journal 3(1), 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, A.: 1993, A Computational framework for representing authors' courseware models. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 9(4), 244–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, S., Cook, J., Shiu, E. and McFadyen, A.: 1997, Adapting to learner attributes: experiments using an adaptive tutoring system, Learning Styles and Strategies, Riding, R.J. and Rayner, S. G. (eds.). Educational Psychology 17(1/2), 141–156.

  • Milne, S., Shiu, E. and Cook, J.: 1996, Development of a Model of User Attributes and its Implementation within an Adaptive Tutoring System. User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction 6, 303–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. and Nielsen, J.: 1990, Improving a human-computer dialogue. Communications of the ACM 33(3), 338–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muldner, T., Muldner, K. and van Veen, C. M.: 1997, Experience from the design of an authoring environment. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 6(1), 114–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohlsson, S.: 1993, Impact of cognitive theory on the practice of authoring. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 9(4), 194–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paolucci, R.: 1998, The effect of cognitive style and knowledge structure on performance using a hypermedia learning system, Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 7(2/3), 123–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paris, C. L., Swartout,W. R. and Mann, W. C.: 1991, Natural language generation in artificial intelligence and computational linguistics, Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, I. and Hannafin, M.: 1993, Empirically-based guidelines for the design of interactive multimedia. Education Technology Research and Development 41, 63–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pask, G.: 1976, Styles and strategies of learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 128–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, J.: 1992, Training, Research and Practice. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillay, H., Boles, W. and Raj, L.: 1998, Personalising the design of computer-based instruction to enhance learning, Association for Learning Technology Journal 6(2), 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Benyon, D., Holland, S. and Carey, T.: 1994, Human-Computer Interaction. Addison Wesley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragnemalm, E. L.: 1996, Student Diagnosis in Practice; Bridging a Gap. UserModelling and User-Adapted Interaction 5, 93–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, K. L. and Davidson-Shivers, G. V.: 1998, Hypermedia and Learning Styles: can performance be influenced? Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia 7(4), 291–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, T. C.: 1992, Evaluating interactive multimedia. Educational Technology, (May) 47–52.

  • Rich, E. A.: 1983, Users are individuals: individualising user models. International Journal of Machine Studies 18, 107–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riding, R. J.: 1991a, Cognitive Style Analysis. Birmingham Learning and Training Technology.

  • Riding, R. J.: 1991b, Cognitive Style Analysis, Users' Manual. Birmingham Learning and Training Technology.

  • Riding, R. J.: 1997, On the nature of cognitive style, Learning Styles and Strategies Riding, R. J. and Rayner, S. G. (eds.), Educational Psychology 17(1/2), 29–49.

  • Riding, R. J. and Saddler-Smith, E.: 1992, Type of Instructional Material, Cognitive style and Learning Performance. Educational Studies 18(3), 323–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riding, R. J. and Watts, M.: 1997, The effect of cognitive style on the preferred formats on instructional material, Learning Styles and Strategies, Riding, R. J. and Rayner, S. G. eds., Educational Psychology 17(1/2), 179–184.

  • Riding, R. J. and Douglas, G.: 1993, The effect of cognitive style and mode of presentation on learning performance, British Journal of Educational Psychology 63, 297–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Self, J. A.: 1990, Bypassing the intractable problem of student modelling, Intelligent tutoring systems: at the crossroads of artificial intelligence and education. Frasson, C. and Gauthier, G. (eds.), Ablex Publishing, Norwood, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. and Jagodzinski, P.: 1995, The implementation of a multimedia learning environment for graduate civil engineers. Association for Learning Technology Journal 3,(1), 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somekh, B.: 1996, Designing software to maximize learning. Association for Learning Technology Journal 4(3), 4–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squires, D. and McDougall, A.: 1996, Software evaluation: a situated approach. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 12(3), 146–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoney, S. and Wild, M.: 1998, Motivation and interface design: maximising learning opportunities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 14(1), 40–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. and Corbin, J.: 1990, Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications.

  • Strauss, A. and Corbin, J.: 1994, Grounded Theory methodology: An overview, In: Handbook of Qualitative Research, Denzin, N. K. and Lincoln, Y. S., (eds.), Sage Publications, London, pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, W. L.: 1953, Cloze Procedure: A new tool for measuring readability, Journalists' Quarterly 30, 415–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vassileva, J.: 1996, A task-centred approach for user modelling in a hypermedia office documentation system. User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction 6(2–3), 185–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, J.: 1995, Assessing Reading: Using cloze procedure to assess reading skills. Adult Literacy and Basic Skills Unit, London.

  • Vygotsky, L.: 1986, Thought and Language. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barker, T., Jones, S., Britton, C. et al. The Use of a Co-operative Student Model of Learner Characteristics to Configure a Multimedia Application. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 12, 207–241 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015002325839

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015002325839

Navigation