Abstract
This article casts into relief the essentialist-existential philosophy implicit in Satir's model of healing using Paul Tillich's systematic philosophical framework. Parallels between Satir's model of the person are drawn with Tillich's ontological categories of essence and existence, individualization and participation, and destiny and freedom. Congruence as the integration of elements in three vital human dimensions: the interpersonal, intrapsychic, and spiritual-universal, is correlated with Tillich's philosophical understanding of “salvation.” The religious quest is understood as a systemic, multidimensional process that brings the interactive and interdependent personal, interpersonal and spiritual dimensions into a restored unity. Thus Satir's rehumanization project and Tillich's religious quest are shown to coincide.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Banmen, A., & Banmen, J. (Eds.). (1991). Meditations of Virginia Satir. Palo Alto: Science and Behavior Books.
Becvar, D. S., & Becvar, R. (1996). Family therapy: A systemic integration (3rd ed.). Toronto: Allyn and Bacon.
Brothers, B. J. (Ed.). (1991). Virginia Satir: Foundational ideas. New York: Haworth Press.
Cheung, M. (1997). Social construction theory and the Satir Model: Toward a synthesis. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 25(4), 331–343.
Davis, B., McLendon, J., Freeman, M., Hill, N., Loberg, J., Lester. T., & Huber, C. (1996). Satir and congruence: A response. In B. J. Brothers (Ed.), Couples and the Tao of congruence (pp. 143–159). New York: Haworth Press.
Duhl, B. (1989). Virginia Satir: In Memoriam. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 15(2), 109–110.
Goldenberg, I., & Goldenberg, H. (1996). Family therapy: An overview (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Greenberg, L., & Rice, L. (1998). Humanistic approaches to psychotherapy. In P. L. Wachtel & S. Messer (Eds.), Theories of psychotherapy: Origins and evolution (pp. 97–129). Washington D.C.: American Psychological Association.
Guerin, P., & Chabot. D. R. (1997). Development of family systems theory. In P. L. Wachtel & S. B. Messer (Eds.), Theories of psychotherapy: Origins and evolution (pp. 181–221). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Hoffman, L. (1981). Foundations of family therapy. New York: Basic Books.
King, L. (1989). Virginia Satir. In L. King (Ed.), Women of power (pp. 11–40). Berkeley: Celestial Arts.
Lee, B. K. (2001). The religious significance of the Satir Model: Philosophical, ritual, and empirical perspectives. Doctoral dissertation. University of Ottawa, Canada.
Livingston, J., & Fiorenza, F. S. (2000). Modern Christian thought. Vol. 2. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Loeschen, S. (1998). Systematic training in the skills of Virginia Satir. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Luepnitz, D. A. (1988). The family interpreted: Feminist theory in clinical practice. New York: Basic Books.
May, R. (1973). Paulus. New York: Harper and Row.
McGoldrick, M. (1989). Remembering Virginia. Family Therapy Networker, January/ February, 13(1), 33–34.
Nichols, M., & Schwartz, R. (1998). Family therapy: Concepts and methods (4th ed.). Toronto: Allyn and Bacon.
Pittman, F. (1989). Remembering Virginia. Family Therapy Networker, January/ February, 13(1), 34–35.
Rogers, C. (1970). Paul Tillich and Carl Rogers: A dialogue. In Carl Rogers on tape. Atlanta, GA: Bell and Howell. Audiocassette.
Satir, V. (1964/1967/1983). Conjoint family therapy. (3rd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
Satir, V. (1970). Self-esteem. Berkeley, CA: Celestial Arts.
Satir, V. (1972). Peoplemaking. Palo Alto: Science and Behavior Books.
Satir, V. (1976). Making contact. Berkeley, CA: Celestial Arts.
Satir, V. (1978). Your many faces. Berkeley, CA: Celestial Arts.
Satir, V. (1986). A partial portrait of a family therapist in process. In C. Fishman & B. Rosman (Eds.), Evolving models for family change (pp. 278–293). New York: Guilford Press.
Satir, V. (1987). The therapist story. In M. Baldwin & V. Satir (Eds.), The use of self in therapy (pp. 17–25). New York: Haworth Press.
Satir, V. (1988). The new peoplemaking. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
Satir, V. (1998). Satir family series (Tapes 1–9). Burien, WA: Avanta: Videocassettes with transcript and study guide.
Satir, V., Banmen, J., Gerber, J., & Gomori, M. (1991). The Satir model: Family therapy and beyond. Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
Schwartz, R. (2000). Psychotherapy as a spiritual practice. In F. Walsh (Ed.), Spiritual resources in family therapy (pp. 223–239). New York: Guilford Press.
Simon, R. (1989). Reaching out to life: An interview with Virginia Satir. The Family Therapy Networker, 13(1), 36–43.
Sprenkle, D., Keeney, B., & Sutton, P. (1982). Theorists who influence clinical members of AAMFT: A research note. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 8(3), 367–369.
Tillich, P. (1948).You are accepted. In P. Tillich, The shaking of the foundations (pp. 153–163). New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
Tillich, P. (1951/1965). Systematic theology. Vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tillich, P. (1952). The courage to be. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Tillich, P. (1955). The new being. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
Tillich, P. (1956). The eternal now. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.
Tillich, P. (1957). Systematic theology. Volume 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tillich, P. (1959). Theology of culture. New York: Oxford Free Press.
Tillich,P. (1961). Existentialism and psychotherapy. Review of Existential Psychology and Psychiatry, 1, 8–16.
Tillich, P. (1963). Systematic theology. Volume 3. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tillich, P. (1967). On the boundary. London: Collins.
Tillich, P. (1996). The irrelevance and relevance of the Christian message. Cleveland: Pilgrim Press.
Walsh, F. (Ed.). (2000). Spiritual resources in family therapy. New York: Guilford Press.
Wulff, D. (1997). Psychology of religion: Classic and contemporary. (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley and Sons.
Zinnbauer, B., Pargament, K., Cole, B., Rye, M., Butter, E., Belavich, T., Hipp, K., Scott, A., & Kadar, F. (1997). Religion and Spirituality: Unfuzzying the fuzzy. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 36(4), 549–564.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, B.K. Congruence in Satir's Model: Its Spiritual and Religious Significance. Contemporary Family Therapy 24, 57–78 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014321621829
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014321621829