Skip to main content
Log in

Structure and the Performance of Public Organizations: Task Difficulty and Span of Control

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scholars of public organizations have long been interested in understanding how organizational structures shape organizational performance. This is an important question because if links between structure and performance exist, then manipulating organizational structures may lead to improvements in organizational performance. This study examines how one structural attribute, span of control, shapes performance in a large set of public organizations. Specifically, our focus is on how structure shapes performance when task difficulty varies. We hypothesize that structural attributes such as spans of control have limited effects on performance when organizations address very easy or very difficult tasks. When organizations address moderately difficult tasks, the impact of structure on performance should be greatest. Our analysis of 678 school districts in Texas covering the years 1994 to 1997 reveals that span of control variables have the greatest impact on student performance under moderately difficult task scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bell, Gerald. (1967). "Determinants of Span of Control." American Journal of Sociology 73 (July), 90–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betts, Julian R. (1995). "Does School Quality Matter? Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth." Review of Economics and Statistics 77 (May), 231–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter M. (1973). The Organization of Academic Work. New York: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, Peter M., and Richard A. Schoenherr. (1971). The Structure of Organizations. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, Ann O'M., and Richard Kearney. (1996). State and Local Government, 3rd ed. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, James S. et al. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golembiewski, Robert T. (1962). Behavior and Organization: O&M and the Small Group. Chicago: Rand-McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodsell, Charles. (1994). The Case for Bureaucracy, 3rd ed. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graicunius, V. A. (1937). "Relationship in Organization." In Luther Gulick and Lydal Urwick (eds.), Papers on the Science of Administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration, Columbia University, pp. 183–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulick, Luther. (1937). "Notes on the Theory of Organization." In Luther Gulick and Lydal Urwick (eds.), Papers on the Science of Administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration, Columbia University, pp. 191–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, Thomas. (1990). "In Defence of Luther Gulick's 'Notes on the Theory of Organization."' Public Administration 68, 143–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, Erik. (1986). "The Economics of Schooling: Participation and Performance." The Journal of Economic Literature 24, 1141–1177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, Erik. (1996). "School Resources and Student Performance." In Gary Burtless (ed.), Does Money Matter?. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanushek, Erik, and Richard R. Pace. (1995). "Who Chooses to Teach (and Why)?" Economics of Education Review 14, 107–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedges, Larry V., and Rob Greenwald. (1996). "Have Times Changed? The Relation Between School Resources and Student Performance." In Gary Burtless (ed.), Does Money Matter?. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jencks, Christopher and Meredith Phillips, eds. (1998). The Black-White Test Score Gap. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, Herbert. (1981). The Administrative Behavior of Federal Bureau Chiefs. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, Michael. (1980). Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, Kenneth J. and Joseph Stewart, Jr. (1991). The Politics of Hispanic Education. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melman, Seymour. (1956). Dynamic Factors in Industrial Productivity. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Danny and Peter H. Friesen. (1984). Organizations: A Quantum View. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, Henry. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, Ronald C. (1994). "The Reinventing Government Exercise: Misinterpreting the Problem, Misjudging the Consequences." Public Administration Review 54, 111–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, David and Ted Gaebler. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. New York: Penguin Books USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, Charles. (1973). "A Framework for Comparative Analysis of Organizations." In F. E. Kast and J. E. Rosenzweig (eds.), Contingency Views of Organization and Management. Chicago: Science Research Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, Charles. (1986). Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, James L. and Charles W. Mueller. (1986). Handbook of Organizational Measurement. White Plains, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainey, Hal G. (1997). Understanding and Managing Public Organizations, 2nd ed. San Francisco: Josey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rong, Xue Lan, and Linda Grant. (1992). "Ethnicity, Generation, and School Attainment of Asians, Hispanics, and Non-Hispanic Whites." Sociological Quarterly 33(4), 625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert. (1946). "The Proverbs of Administration." Public Administration Review 4(1), 16–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stimson, James. (1985). "Regression in Time and Space: A Statistical Essay." American Journal of Political Science 29(4), 914–947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, Andrew H., Andre L. Delbecq, and Richard Koenig. (1976). "Determinants of Coordination Modes Within Organizations." American Sociological Review 41, 322–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenglinsky, Harold. (1997). How Educational Expenditures Improve Student Performance and How They Don't. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthy, James C. (1950). "Organizational Structure and Employee Morale." American Sociological Review 15, 169–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthy, James C. (1959). Big Business and Free Men. New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, James Q. (1989). Bureaucracy. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, James Q. (1985). Thinking About Crime. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, Joan. (1980). Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice, 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bohte, J., Meier, K.J. Structure and the Performance of Public Organizations: Task Difficulty and Span of Control. Public Organization Review 1, 341–354 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012284830077

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012284830077

Navigation