Skip to main content
Log in

Reproductive biology and effect of nectar robbing on fruit production in Macleania bullata (Ericaceae)

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hummingbird-pollinated flowers are frequently subjected to nectar robbing. In this paper, I examine the impact of nectar robbing on plant reproductive success on a hummingbird-pollinated species. After studying the basic aspects of the floral morphology and reproduction of Macleania bullata (Ericaceae) in a tropical montane wet forest in southwest Colombia, I examined the percent of flowers robbed and the effect of nectar robbery on fruit set. The flowers of this species are typical for plants pollinated by long-bill hummingbirds. They are protandrous and open for four days. Fruit production requires a pollinator visit; fruit set following pollinator exclusion was zero. Fruit set following xenogamous pollen transfer (36.8%) differed significantly from that of population controls (11.9%) and of autogamous pollen transfer (6.3%). Nectar volume, sugar concentration and sugar production were measured at daily intervals from bud opening until the fading of flowers. Daily nectar production (both volume and amount of sugar) varied considerably with flower age. Sugar production peaked on the second day, coinciding with the male phase. The frequency of nectar robbing in the studied population was very high (75% of examined flowers) and was positively correlated with reduced fruit set. I discuss the probability of a relation between reduced fruit set on robbed flowers and an energetic investment. Robbing by non-pollinating visitors can suppose the plant to re-synthesize more nectar. The high incidence of nectar robbing impugns the advantage of specialization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arizmendi, M. C., Domínguez, C. A. & Dirzo, R. 1996. The role of an avian robber and of hummingbird pollinators in the reproduction of two plant species. Funct. Ecol. 10: 119–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Shalom, D. & Mattson, O. 1977. Mode of hydration, an important factor in the germination of trinucleate pollen grains. Botanisk Tidsskrift 71: 245–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bittrich, V. & Amaral, M. C. E. 1996. Pollination biology of Symphonia globulifera (Clusidiaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 200: 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, F. L., Hixon, M. A., Temeles, E. J., Russell, R. W. & Paton, D. C. 1993. Exploitative compensation by subordinate age-sex classes of migrant rufous hummingbirds. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 33: 305–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruden, R. W. & Hermann, S. M. 1983. Studying nectar? Some observations on the art. Pp. 223–241. In: Bentley, B. & Elias, T. S. (eds), The biology of nectaries. Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, J. H. & Beattie, A. J. 1991. Mutualisms: assessing the benefits to host and visitors. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6: 191–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dukas, R. & Real, L. A. 1993. Effects of nectar variance on learning by bumble bees. Animal Behav. 45: 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faegri, K. & van der Pijl, L 1979. The principles of pollination ecology. Third edition. Pergamon, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinsinger, P. & Colwell, R. K. 1978. Community organization among neotropical nectar-feeding birds. Am. Zool. 18: 779–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Free, J. B. & Butler, C. G. 1959. Bumblebees. Collins. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galen, C. 1983. The effect of nectar-thieving ants on seedset in floralscent morphs of Polemoniun viscosum. Oikos 41: 245–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, G. R. 1982. Pollination of a Tristerix Mistletoe (Loranthaceae) by Diglossa. Biotropica 14: 316–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handel, S. N. 1983. Pollination ecology, plant population structure and gene flow. Pp. 163–211. In: Real, L. (ed), Pollination biology. Academic Press, Inc. Orlando, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harder, L. D. & Barrett, S. C. H. 1992. The energy cost of bee pollination for Pontederia cordata (Pontederiaceae). Funct. Ecol. 6: 226–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, R. P. 1961. Observations on the pollination of red clover by bees. I. The yield of seed in relation to the numbers and kinds of pollinators. Ann. Appl. Biol. 49: 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, B. 1976. Resource partitioning among some eusocial insects: bumblebees. Ecology 57: 874–889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, C. M. 1996. Floral traits and plant adaptation to insect pollinators: a devil's advocate approach. Pp. 65–87. In: Lloyd, D. G. & Barrett, S. C. H. (eds), Floral biology: studies on floral evolution in animal-pollinated plants. Chapman and Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, C.M. 2000. Flower-to-seedling consequences of different pollination regimes in an insect-pollinated shrub. Ecology 81: 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdridge, L. 1996. Ecología basada en zonas de vida. 4 reimpresión. Ed. IICA/CIRA.

  • Inouye, D. W. 1983. The ecology of nectar robbing. Pp. 153–174. In: Bentley, B. & Elias, T. S. (eds), The biology of nectaries. Columbia University Press. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, R. E. & Brody, A. K. 1998. Nectar robbing in Ipomopsis aggregata: effects on pollinator behavior and plant fitness. Oecologia 116: 519–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luteyn, J. L. 1989. Speciation and diversity of Ericaceae in neotropical montane vegetation. Tropical Forest: 297–310.

  • McDade, L. A. & Kinsman, S. 1980. The impact of floral parasitism in two neotropical hummingbird-pollinated plant species. Evolution 34: 944–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melampy, M. N. 1987. Flowering phenology, pollen flow and fruit production in the Andean shrub Befaria resinosa. Oecologia 73: 293–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, W. F. 1996. Mutualism denied? Nectar-robbing bumble bees do not reduce female or male success of bluebells. Ecology 77: 1451–1462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, L. (1999) Pollination ecology and effect of nectar removal in Macleania bullata (Ericaceae). Biotropica 31 (4): 618–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, D. R. & Conley, T. M. 1994. Field metabolic rate and food consumption of two sympatric hummingbird species in southeastern Arizona. Condor 96: 141–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, G. H. 1991. How much does floral nectar cost? Nature 350: 58–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubik, D. W. 1982. The ecological impact of nectar-robbing bees and pollinating hummingbirds on a tropical shrub. Ecology 63: 354–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soberón, J. & Martínez del Río, C. 1985. Cheating and taking advantage. Pp. 192–213. In: Boucher, D. (ed.), The biology of mutualism: Ecology and evolution. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwick, E. E. 1984. Photosynthate allocation to floral nectar: A neglected energy investment. Ecology 65: 1775–1779.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traveset, A., Willson, M. F. & Sabag, C. 1998. Effect of nectarrobbing birds on fruit set of Fuchsia magellanica in Tierra Del Fuego: a disrupted mutualism. Funct. Ecol. 12: 459–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser, N. M. 1979. Pollinator availability as a determinant of flowering time in ocotillo (Fouquieria splendens). Oecologia 39: 107–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waser, N. M., Chittka, L., Price, M. V., Williams, N. M. & Ollerton, J. 1996. Generalization in pollination systems, and why it matters. Ecology 77: 1043–1060.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmer, P. G. & Corbet, S. A. 1981. Temporal and microclimatic partitioning of the floral resources of Justicia aurea amongst a concourse of pollen vectors and nectar robbers. Oecologia 51: 67–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt, R. 1980. The impact of nectar-robbing ants on the pollination system of Asclepias curassavica. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 107: 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Navarro, L. Reproductive biology and effect of nectar robbing on fruit production in Macleania bullata (Ericaceae). Plant Ecology 152, 59–65 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011463520398

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011463520398

Navigation