Skip to main content
Log in

The Perceived Credibility of Scientific Claims, Paranormal Phenomena, and Miracles Among Primary Teacher Students: A Comparative Study

  • Published:
Science & Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Science has been and is an important tool in the construction of theworld view of modern man. There are also others, such as differentreligions. Although the Christian church has had to yield in manydisputes about world-views and philosophies of life, science doesnot seem to have superseded religion. The same also applies to themagic-occult tradition which is supported by numerous occultistmovements and sometimes even the media. From the viewpoint ofscience education, it is interesting to examine to what extent, if at all,the future educators of our children believe in claims presented inscientific, religious and magic-occult connections. Do we find anydifferences between the credibility estimates? Are there any differencesbetween primary teacher students raised in different societies andeducated in different school systems? How do the credibility estimatesrelate to each other? To answer these questions, data was collected bya questionnaire from Finnish, Estonian and Michigan primary teacherstudents. The paper presents the most important results and discussesshortly their significance from the viewpoint of science education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcock, J. E.: 1987, ‘Parapsychology: Science of the Anomalous or Search for the Soul?', Behavior and Brain Sciences 10, 553–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, W. S.: 1981a, ‘Biorhythms: Evaluating a Pseudoscience', in K. Frazier (ed.), Paranormal Borderlands of Science, Prometheus Books, Buffalo, New York, pp. 191–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, W. S.: 1981b, ‘Chariots of the Gullible', in K. Frazier (ed.), Paranormal Borderlands of Science, Prometheus Books, Buffalo, New York, pp. 332–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, W. S. & Stark, R.: 1981, ‘Superstitions: Old and New', in K. Frazier (ed.), Paranormal Borderlands of Science, Prometheus Books, Buffalo, New York, pp. 46–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauslaugh, G.: 1981, ‘Science, Intuition, and ESP', in K. Frazier (ed.), Paranormal Borderlands of Science, Prometheus Books, Buffalo, New York, pp. 32–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burbules, N. C. & Linn, M. C.: 1991, ‘Science Education and Philosophy of Science: Congruence or Contradiction', Journal of Science Education 13(3), 227–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, S.: 1990, Vainottu kirkko. Luterilaiset kirkot Itä-Euroopan maissa. Pieksämäki: Sisälähetysseuran kirjapaino Raamattutalo. [The Church under Persecution: Lutheran Churches in the Eastern European Countries.]

  • Dubrov, A. & Puskin, V.: 1988, Parapsykologia ja moderni luonnontiede (Parapsychology and Modern Science), Kustannusliike Progress, Helsinki.

  • Hansel, C. E. M.: 1980, ESP and Parapsychology: A Critical Evolution, Prometheus, Buffalo, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hick, J.: 1992. Uskonnonfilosofia (Philosophy of Religion), Gummerus, Jyväskylä.

  • Keranto, T.: 1996, Tiede, näennäistiede, usko nuorten mielikuvissa ja kasvatuksessa. Tutkimuskohteen teoreettinen erittely sekä kaksi kartoitusta. Abstract in English: Science, Pseudoscience,Faith in Adolescents’ Minds and in Education. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis. Scientia Rerum Socialium, E 19.

  • Keranto, T.: 1999, ‘Where to Put Our Trust and Belief? The Credibility of Scientific Claims, Paranormal Phenomena and Miracles, and the Relations between these beliefs among Finnish and Estonian secondary school students', in I. Winchester & L. Lentz (eds.), Toward Scientific Literacy, HPSST Conference Proceedings, Faculty of Education, University of Calgary, pp. 415–424.

  • Lahtinen, A., Laitila, T. & Suttner, E.: 1990, Usko, toivo ja vallankumous. Kristinusko ja kirkot Neuvostoliitossa (Faith, Hope and Revolution. Christian Faith and Churches in USSR), Otava, Keuruu.

  • Lakatos, I.: 1976, Proofs and Refutations. The Logic of Mathematical Discovery, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Leikola, A.: 1984, in J. Worral & E. Zahar, Aika biologiassa (Time in Biology), WSOY, Juva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manninen, J.: 1977, Maailmankuvat maailman ja sen muutoksen heijastajina. Teoksessa Kuusi, M., Alapuro, R. & Klinge, M. (toim.) Maailmankuvan muutos tutkimuksessa, [Worldviews Reflecting the World and Its Change], Otava, Keuruu, Helsinki, pp. 13–48.

  • Martin, M.: 1994, ‘Pseudoscience, The Paranormal and Science Education', Science & Education 3(4), 357–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPeck, J. E.: 1990, Teaching Critical Thinking Dialogue and Dialectic, Routledge, Chapman and Hall, Inc., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S.: 1981, ‘Believing in ESP: Effects of Dehoaxing', in K. Frazier (ed.), Paranormal Borderlands of Science, Prometheus Books, Buffalo, New York, pp. 32–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nenonen, M.: 1992, Noituus, taikuus ja noitavainot Ala-Satakunnan, Pohjois-Pohjanmaan ja Viipurin Karjalan maaseudulla vuosina 1620–1700. Suomen historiallisen seuran Historiallisia Tutkimuksia 165. Jyväskylä: Gummerus. [Witchcraft, Magic and Witch Hunts in the Rural Areas of Lower Satakunta, Northern Ostrobothnia and Southern Karelia from 1620 to 1700.]

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1984, Tiede, filosofia ja maailmankatsomus, [Science, Philosophy and Worldview], Otava, Keuruu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oittinen, V.: 1979, Marxilainen uskontokritiikki. Tieteellisen ateismin lähtökohtia (The Marxist Criticism of Religion. Starting-Points of Scientific Atheism), Kansankulttuuri, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, R.: 1992, in A. J. Binker (ed.), Critical Thinking. What Every Person Needs to Survive in a Rapidly Changing World, Foundation for Critical Thinking, Santa Rosa, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R.: 1969, Conjectures and Refutations. The Growth of Scientific Thinking (3rd edition (revised)), Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Räisänen, H.: 1988, ‘Raamatun ihmeet: Tarua vai totta? Eräitä periaatteellisia näkökohtia (Biblical Miracles: Truth or Fiction?)’ Teologinen aikakauskirja 93(1), 15–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaugnessy, J. M.: 1992, ‘Research in Probability and Statistics: Reflections and Directions', in D. A. Grows (ed.), Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, MacMillan Publishing Company, New York, pp. 465–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, H.: 1981, Creationism, Evolution, and Education: The California Fiasco, Phi Delta Kappan, October, 95–101.

  • Siegel, H.: 1988, Educating Reason. Rationality, Critical Thinking and Education, Routledge, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, R.: 1981, Antroposofinen hengentiede (Geheimwissenschaft im Umriss), Suomen antroposofinen liitto, Gummerus, Jyväskylä.

  • Story, R. D.: 1981, ‘Von Däniken's Golden Gods', in K. Frazier (ed.), Paranormal Borderlands of Science, Prometheus Books, Buffalo, New York, pp. 318–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tambiah, S. J.: 1990, Magic, Science, Religion, and the Scope of Rationality, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K.: 1971, Religion and the Decline of Magic, Charles Scribner's Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobacyk, J. & Milford, G.: 1983, ‘Belief in Paranormal Phenomena: Assessment Instrument Development and Implications for Personality Functioning', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44(5), 1029–1037.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, D.: 1992, ‘A Mythology of Reason. The Persistence of Pseudo-Science in the ModernWorld', in S. A. Knight (ed.), Science, Pseudo-Science, and Utopianism in Early Modern Thought, University of Missouri Press, Columbia and London, pp. 141–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, B.: 1971, Giordano Bruno and the Hermetic Tradition, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keranto, T. The Perceived Credibility of Scientific Claims, Paranormal Phenomena, and Miracles Among Primary Teacher Students: A Comparative Study. Science & Education 10, 493–511 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011261132355

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011261132355

Keywords

Navigation