Skip to main content
Log in

Attenuation smear: A ‘paradoxical’ increase in counts due to attenuation artifact

  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: Attenuation is a well recognized cause of reconstruction artifacts in SPECT imaging. Occasionally, we have noted an increase in activity extending from the apical septal portion of the ventricle in women with significant breast attenuation. Although the idea that attenuation can produce an increase in activity on the reconstructed images seems paradoxical at first, it is consistent with the process of filtered back projection. Methods: We filled a cardiac phantom with 1 mCi of Technetium-99m, placed it in a water filled anthropomorphic torso phantom and imaged it over a 180° orbit. Next, a breast phantom designed to simulate a significant degree of breast attenuation was placed on the torso phantom and imaging was repeated. The images were reconstructed first using conventional filtered back projection then with maximum likelihood. Results: When the phantoms with and without breast attenuation were reconstructed using filtered back projection and compared, the phantom with breast attenuation had a large ‘smear’ of activity extending anteriorly from the apical septal wall which was very similar to the abnormalities previously noted in clinical images; the phantom without breast attenuation had no such defect. This artifact was significantly less prominent when the images were reconstructed using the maximum likelihood technique. Conclusions: Attenuation artifact can also produce a seemingly paradoxical increase in counts on the reconstructed image but this phenomenon is consistent with the workings of filtered back projection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eisner R, Churchwell A, Noever T, et al. Quantitative analysis of the tomographic thallium-201 myocardial bullseye display: critical role of correcting for patient motion. J Nucl Med 1988; 29: 91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  2. DePuey EG, Garcia EV. Optimal specificity of thallium-201 SPECT through recognition of imaging artifacts. J Nucl Med 1989; 30: 441–449.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sorrell V, Figueroa B, Hansen CL. The “hurricane sign”: evidence of patient motion artifact on cardiac single-photon emission computed tomographic imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 1996; 3: 86–88.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hansen CL, Siegel JA. Attenuation correction of thallium-SPECT using differential attenuation of thallium photons. J Nucl Med 1992; 33: 1574–1577.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hansen CL, Heo J, Oliner C, Van Decker W, Iskandrian AS. Prediction of improvement of left ventricular function with Iodine-123 IPPA after coronary revascularization. J Nucl Med 1995; 36: 1987–1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lange K, Carson R. EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. J Comp Assist Tomogr 1984; 8: 306–316.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Snyder DL, Miller MI. The use of sieves to stabilize images produced with the em algorithm for emission tomography. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 1985; NS-32: 3864–3872.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beller GA. Diagnostic accuracy of thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging. Circulation 1991; 84: 11–16.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goodgold HM, Rehder JG, Samucls LD, Chaitman BR. Improved interpretation of exercise T1–201 myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in women: characterization of breast attenuation artifacts. Radiology 1987; 165: 361–366.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kaul S. A look at 15 years of planar thallium-201 imaging. Am Heart J 1989; 118: 581–601.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Manglos SH, Jaszczak RJ, Floyd CE, Hahn LJ, Greer KL, Coleman RE. Nonisotropic attenuation in SPECT: phantom tests of quantitative effects and compensation techniques. J Nucl Med 1987; 28: 1584–1591.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kak AC, Slaney M. Principles of computerized tomographic imaging. New York: IEEE Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Di Bella EVR, Eisner RL, Barclay AB, Patterson RE, Nowak DJ. Attenuation artifacts in SPECT: effect of wraparound lung in 180 degrees cardiac studies. J Nucl Med 1996; 37: 1891–1896.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Manglos SH, Thomas FD, Gagne GM, Hellwig BJ. Phantom study of breast tissue attenuation in myocardial imaging. J Nucl Med 1993; 34: 992–996.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hansen, C.L., Kramer, M. Attenuation smear: A ‘paradoxical’ increase in counts due to attenuation artifact. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 16, 455–460 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010774426750

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010774426750

Navigation