Skip to main content
Log in

Redefining community: towards an ecological republicanism

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper makes some suggestions for a concept of community which arguably satisfies the most important criteria for both human communities, as defined in the social sciences and humanities, and natural communities, as defined in ecology and biology. Beginning with the former, I arrive at two such criteria: (1) a material and social connection among members, and (2) some kind and degree of awareness of other members. These are then supplemented with a third drawn from civic republicanism, with its focus on citizenship and the common good: communities (3) enable and require certain practices for their maintainence. Turning to ecological definitions of community, I find the dominant (reductionist) one seriously deficient as compared with a more holist and ecosystemic approach. However, I invoke a nonreductive holism to defend the idea of community, and go on to argue that each of the three above-mentioned criteria can be fruitfully extended to include both social and ecological communities in a nonreductionist way – that is, in a way that neither reduces ecosystemic properties to individual organisms nor the reverse. This culminates in a discussion of what I call ‘ecological republicanism’, which I suggest could have powerfully positive effects on the contemporary crisis of undue human impact on the natural world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abercrombie N, Hill S and Turner BS (eds) (1994) The Penguin Dictionary of Sociology. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson B (1983) Imagined Communities. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson G (1972) Steps to an Ecology of Mind. Chandler, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson G (1979) Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. Dutton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Begon M, Harper JL and Townsend CR (eds) (1996) Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities, 3rd edn. Blackwell Science, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Botkin D (1992) Discordant Harmonies: New Ecology for the Twenty-First Century. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan AA (1995) Ecological theory and value in nature. In: Elliott R (ed) Environmental Ethics, pp 188–214.Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Budiansky S (1995) Nature's Keepers: The New Science of Nature Management. Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler H (1986) Escape from the Anthill. The Lilliput Press, Mullingar

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra F (1996) The Web of Life: A New Synthesis of Mind and Matter. Harper Collins, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Catton WR and Dunlap RE (1980) A new ecological paradigm for post-exuberant sociology. American Behavioural Scientist 24: 15–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifford S and King A (eds) (1996) From place to PLACE. Common Ground, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen A (1985) The Symbolic Construction of Community. Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry P and Zarate O (1995) Machiavelli for Beginners. Icon Books, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld D (1981) The Arrogance of Humanism, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans P (1992) ‘What is this thing called life?’ The Guardian (21.8.92)

  • Forman RTT and Godron M (1986) Landscape Ecology. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Golley FB (1993) A History of the Ecosystem Concept in Ecology: More Than the Sum of the Parts. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold T (1996) Hunting and gathering as ways of perceiving the environment. In: Ellen R and Fukui K (eds) Redefining Nature, pp 117–155. Berg, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold Aldo (1966) A Sand County Almanac. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins R and Lewontin R (1980) Dialectics and Reductionism in Ecology, Synthese 43(1): 47–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Margulis L (1999) The Symbiotic Planet: A New Look at Evolution. Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley M (1995) Duties concerning islands. In: Elliott R (ed) Environmental Ethics, pp 89–103. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin A (1993) Regarding Nature: Industrialism and Deep Ecology. State University of New York Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Naveh Z and Lieberman AS (1994) Landscape Ecology: Theory and Application, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP (1983) Basic Ecology. Saunders College Publishing, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldfield A (1990) Citizenship and Community: Civil Republicanism and the Modern World. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Outhwaite W and Bottomore T (eds) (1993) The Blackwell Dictionary of Twentieth-Century Social Thought. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Passmore J (1980) Man's Responsibility for Nature, 2nd edn. Duckworth, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit P (1997) Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumwood V (1998) Wilderness dualism and wilderness skepticism. In: Callicott JB and Nelson M (eds) The Great New Wilderness Debate, pp 652–690. University of Georgia Press, Athens, Georgia

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe JS (1997) From reductionism to holism in ecology and deep ecology. The Ecologist 27(4): 147–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandel MJ (1996) Democracy's Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy. Belknap Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (1980) A succession of paradigms in ecology: essentialism to materialism and probabilism.Synthese 43(1): 3–39; and ‘Reply’, Synthese 43(1): 79–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner Q (1981) Machiavelli. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith B Herrnstein (1997) Belief and Resistance: Dynamics of Contemporary Intellectual Controversy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Statman D (1997) Virtue Ethics: A Critical Reader. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone CD (1988) Moral pluralism and the course of environmental ethics. Environmental Ethics 10: 139–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Sylvan R and Bennett D (1994) The Greening of Ethics: From Human Chauvinism to Deep-Green Theory. The White Horse Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Teles S (1997) ‘Think local, act local’, New Statesman (22.8.97)

  • Williams R (1983) Keywords. Fontana, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Curry, P. Redefining community: towards an ecological republicanism. Biodiversity and Conservation 9, 1059–1071 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008970518564

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008970518564

Navigation