Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Distributional Effects of Indirect Tax Changes in Italy

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper evaluatesthe distributional and welfare effects of two recent changesof Value Added Tax (VAT) and excise taxes in Italy applying andcomparing two related and complementary methods of analysis:the first based on the distributional characteristics of Feldstein(1972) and recently applied by Newbery (1995); the second basedon the theory of marginal dominance developed by Mayshar andYitzhaki (1996). The paper finds no evidence that the reformshave redistributed purchasing power among households. But themost striking result is that a simpler two-rate VAT structure,set according to the European directives on VAT coordination,could have replaced the present system producing the same revenueand increasing welfare. This last result provides a clear instancein which reducing the number of VAT rates can be welcome evenin the presence of distributional concerns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad, E., and N. Stern. (1984). “The Theory of Reform and Indian Indirect Taxes.” Journal of Public Economics 25, 259–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad, E., and N. Stern. (1991). The Theory and Practice of Tax Reform in Developing Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apps, P. F., and R. Rees. (1996). “Labour Supply, Household Production and Intra-FamilyWelfare Distribution.” Journal of Public Economics 60, 199–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B. (1970). “On the Measurement of Inequality.” Journal of Economic Theory 2, 244–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B., and F. Bouguignon. (1982). “The Comparison of Multi-Dimensioned Distributions of Economic Status.” Review of Economic Studies 49, 183–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B., and F. Bouguignon. (1987). “Income Distribution and Differences in Needs.” In G. Feiwel (ed.), Arrow and the Foundation of the Theory of Economic Policy. New York: New York University Press, 350–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B., and F. Bouguignon. (1989). “The Design of Direct Taxation and Family Benefits.” Journal of Public Economics 41, 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach, C. M., and R. Davidson. (1983). “Distribution-Free Statistical Inference with Lorenz Curves and Income Shares.” Review of Economic Studies 50, 723–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T. J., and H. S. Rosen. (1998). “Sales Taxes and Prices: An Empirical Analysis.” National Bureau of Economic Research. Working paper 6667.

  • Bishop, J. A., J. P. Formby, and P. D. Thistle. (1989). “Statistical Inference, Income Distributions and Social Welfare.” Research on Economic Inequality, 49–82.

  • Blundell, R., P. Pashardes, and G. Weber. (1993). “What Do We Learn About Consumer Demand Patterns from Micro Data?” American Economic Review 83, 570–597.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandolini, A. (1993). “A Description and an Assessment of the Sample Surveys on the Personal Distribution of Incomes in Italy.” The Microsimulation Unit Working Papers University of Cambridge, n. 9303.

  • Coulter, F., F. Colwell, and S. Jenkins. (1992). “Equivalence Scale Relativities and the Extent of Inequality and Poverty.” Economic Journal 102, 1067–1082.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, H. (1920). “The Measurement of the Inequality of Incomes.” Economic Journal 30, 348–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. (1975). “Welfare Effects of Tax and Price Changes.” Journal of Public Economics 4, 103–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M. S. (1972). “Distributional Equity and the Optimal Structure of Public Prices.” American Economic Review 62, 32–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M. S. (1976). “On the Theory of Tax Reform.” Journal of Public Economics 6, 77–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, F. M. (1987). “Household Equivalence Scales and Interpersonal Comparisons.” Review of Economic Studies 54, 519–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guesnerie, R. (1977). “On the Direction of Tax Reform.” Journal of Public Economics 7, 179–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadar, J., and W. R. Russell. (1969). “Rules for Ordering Uncertain Prospects.” American Economic Review 59, 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haddad, L., and R. Kanbur. (1980). “How Serious is the Neglect of Intra-Household Inequality.” Economic Journal 100, 866–881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanoch, G., and H. Levy. (1969). “The Efficiency Analysis of Choice Involving Risk.” Review of Economic Studies 36, 333–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, S., and P. Lambert. (1993). “Ranking Income Distributions When Needs Differ.” Review of Income and Wealth 39, 337–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, H., and P. B. Spahn. (1989). “On the Efficiency and Distributive Justice of Consumption Taxes: A Study on VAT in West Germany.” Journal of Economics 49, 199–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, P. (1993). The Distribution and Redistribution of Income. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C., M. Pearson, and S. Smith. (1988). “Fiscal Harmonisation: An Analysis of the European Commissions Proposals.” Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.

  • Maasoumi, E. (1997). “Empirical Analyses of Inequality and Welfare.” In M. H. Pearson and P. Schmidt (eds.), Handbook of Applied Econometrics, vol. II, 202–245.

  • Madden, D. (1995a). “An Analysis of Indirect Tax Reform in Ireland in the 1980s.” Fiscal Studies 16, 18–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madden, D. (1995b). “Labour Supply, Commodity Demand and Marginal Tax Reform.” Economic Journal 105, 485–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayshar, J., and S. Yitzhaki. (1995). “Dalton-Improving Indirect Tax Reform.” American Economic Review 85, 793–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayshar, J., and S. Yitzhaki. (1996). “Dalton-Improving Tax Reform When Households Differ in Ability and Needs.” Journal of Public Economics 62, 399–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf, G. E. (1994). “The Lifetime Incidence of State and Local Taxes: Measuring Changes During the 1980s.” In J. Slemrod (ed.), Tax Progressivity and Income Inequality. New York: Cambridge University Press, 59–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murty, M. N., and R. Ray. (1989). “A Computational Procedure for Calculating Optimal Commodity Taxes with Illustrative Evidence from Indian Budget Data.” Scandinavian Journal of Economics 91, 655–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbery, D.M. G. (1995). “The Distributional Impact of Price Changes in Hungary and in the United Kingdom.” Economic Journal 105, 847–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newbery, D. M. G., and T. Révész. (1995). “The Burden of the Hungarian Personal Tax System.” Department of Applied Economics, Cambridge University (UK), mimeo.

  • Newbery, D. M. G., and N. Stern (eds.). (1987). The Theory of Taxation for Developing Countries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichèle, V., and J. M. Robin. (1995). “Simulation of Indirect Tax Reforms Using Pooled Micro and Macro French Data.” Journal of Public Economics 56, 225–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pechman, J. A., and B. A. Okner. (1974). Who Bears the Tax Burden? Washington DC: Brookings Institutions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollak, A. R., and T. J. Wales. (1979). “Welfare Comparisons and Equivalence Scales.” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 69, 216–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poterba, J. M. (1991). “Is the Gasoline Tax Regressive?” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers 3578.

  • Roberts, K. (1980). “Price-Independent Welfare Prescriptions.” Journal of Public Economics 13, 277–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, M., and J. Stiglitz. (1970). “Increasing Risk I: A Definition.” Journal of Economic Theory 2, 225–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks, A. F. (1983). “Ranking Income Distributions.” Economica 50, 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slesnick, D. T. (1998). “Empirical Approaches to the Measurement of Welfare.” Journal of Economic Literature 36, 2108–2165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirole, J., and R. Guesnerie. (1981). “Tax Reform from the Gradient Projection Viewpoint.” Journal of Public Economics 15, 275–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore, G. A. (1970). “Third-Degree Stochastic Dominance.” American Economic Review 60, 457–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wibaut, S. (1989). Tax Reform in Disequilibrium Economies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yitzhaki, S., and J. D. Lewis. (1995). “Guidelines on Searching for a Dalton-Improving Tax Reform: An Illustration with Data from Indonesia.” World Bank, mimeo.

  • Yitzhaki, S., and J. Slemrod. (1991). “Welfare Dominance: An Application to Commodity Taxation.” American Economic Review 81, 480–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yitzhaki, S., and W. Thirsk. (1990). “Welfare Dominance and the Design of Excise Taxation in the Cote d'Ivorie.” Journal of Development Economics 33, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Economia Pubblica - Via del Castro Laurenziano 9, Università di Roma ``La Sapienza'', Facoltà di Economia, 00161, Roma, Italia

    Paolo Liberati

Authors
  1. Paolo Liberati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liberati, P. The Distributional Effects of Indirect Tax Changes in Italy. International Tax and Public Finance 8, 27–51 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008789432330

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008789432330

Search

Navigation