Skip to main content
Log in

A Second-Best Analysis of Environmental Subsidies

  • Published:
International Tax and Public Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the complications posed by pre-existing tax distortions in the economy, for the evaluation of a variety of subsidy policies that affect the environment. These complications include not only the efficiency cost of financing the subsidy by distortionary taxation, but also the interaction effects between the subsidized market and markets with pre-existing taxes. Studies that ignore both of these effects, or only incorporate the first type of effect, can be highly misleading.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alston, J. M., and B. H. Hurd. (1990). “Some Neglected Social Costs of Government Spending in Farm Programs.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72, 149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. B., and N. H. Stern. (1974). “Pigou, Taxation and Public Goods.” Review of Economic Studies 41, 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, C. L., and D. Fullerton. (1992). “Distortionary Taxes and the Provision of Public Goods.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 6, 117–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, C. L., and S. G. Medema. (1993). “The Marginal Efficiency Effects of Taxes and Subsidies in the Presence of Externalities.” Journal of Public Economics 52, 199–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, C. L., J. B. Shoven and J. Whalley. (1985). “General Equilibrium Computations of the Marginal Welfare Costs of Taxes in the United States.” American Economic Review 75, 128–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. J., and W. E. Oates. (1988). The Theory of Environmental Policy (Second edition). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovenberg, A. L., and R. A. de Mooij. (1994). “Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation.” American Economic Review 84, 1085–1089.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovenberg, A. L., and F. van der Ploeg. (1994). “Environmental Policy, Public Finance and the Labor Market in a Second Best World.” Journal of Public Economics 55, 349–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovenberg, A. L., and L. H. Goulder. (1996). “Optimal Environmental Taxation in the Presence of other Taxes: An Applied General Equilibrium Analysis.” American Economic Review 86, 985–1000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovenberg, A. L., and L. H. Goulder. (1997). “Costs of Environmentally Motivated Taxes in the Presence of other Taxes: General Equilibrium Analysis.” National Tax Journal 50, 59–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, E. K. (1987). “On the Marginal Welfare Cost of Taxation.” American Economic Review 77, 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, E. K. (1992). “Subsidies Financed with Distorting Taxes.” National Tax Journal 45, 121–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBO. (1996). “Labor Supply and Taxes.” Congressional Budget Office Memorandum, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, D. (1996). “Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation: Comment.” American Economic Review 87, 245–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, D., and G. Metcalf (1996). “Environmental Controls, Scarcity Rents and Pre−Existing Distortions.” University of Texas, Austin, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulder, L. H. (1995). “Effects of Carbon Taxes in an Economy with prior Tax Distortions: An Intertemporal General Equilibrium Analysis.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 29, 271–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulder, L. H., I. W. H. Parry and D. Burtraw. (1997). “Revenue−Raising vs. Other Approaches to Environmental Protection: The Critical Significance of Pre−Existing Tax Distortions.” RAND Journal of Economics 28, 708–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, S., K. Miranda and I. W. H. Parry. (1995). “Public Expenditure Policy and the Environment: A Review and Synthesis.” World Development 23, 515–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harberger, A. C. (1984). “Basic Needs versus Distributional Weights in Social Cost−Benefit Analysis.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 32, 455–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, B. J., and A. Shah. (1992). “World Fossil Fuel Subsidies and Global Carbon Emissions.” World Bank, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, Y. K. (1980). “Optimal Corrective Taxes or Subsidies when Revenue−Raising Imposes an Excess Burden.” American Economic Review 70, 744–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, I. W. H. (1995). “Pollution Taxes and Revenue Recycling.” Journal of Environmental Economics & Management 29, S64–S77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, I. W. H. (1997). “Environmental Taxes and Quotas in the Presence of Distortionary Taxes in Factor Markets.” Resource and Energy Economics 19, 203–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piacentino, D., and S. Smith. (1994). “Taxes and Subsidies in Environmental Fiscal Reform.” Institute for Fiscal Studies, London, U. K.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repetto, R., (1986). Skimming the Water: Rent−Seeking and the Performance of Public Irrigation Systems. World Resources Institute, Washington, D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repetto, R. (1988). The Forest for the Trees? Government Policy and the Misuse of Forest Resources. World Resources Institute, Washington, D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandmo, A. (1975). “Optimal Taxation in the Presence of Externalities.” Swedish Journal of Economics 77, 86–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schöb, R. (1996). “Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation: The Normalization Trap.” University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildasin, D. E. (1984). “On Public Good Provision with Distortionary Taxation.” Economic Inquiry 22, 557–543.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parry, I.W.H. A Second-Best Analysis of Environmental Subsidies. International Tax and Public Finance 5, 153–170 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008638320593

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008638320593

Navigation