Skip to main content
Log in

Solutions and Ambiguities of the Structure and Motion Problem for 1D Retinal Vision

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper we investigate the geometry and algebra of multiple one-dimensional projections of a two-dimensional environment. This is relevant for one-dimensional cameras, e.g. as used in certain autonomous guided vehicles. It is also relevant for understanding the projection of lines in ordinary vision. A third application is on ordinary vision of vehicles undergoing so called planar motion. The structure and motion problem for such cameras is studied and the two possible minimal cases is solved. The technique of solving these questions reveal interesting ambiguities. It is shown that for each solution with three images there is an ambiguous solution. It is also shown that for each solution for four points there is an ambiguous solution. The connection between these two different types of ambiguities is also given. Although the paper deals with calibrated cameras, it is shown that similar results exist for uncalibrated cameras.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. N. Altshiller-Court, College Geometry, Barnes and Noble: New York, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Armstrong, A. Zisserman, and R. Hartley, “Self-calibration from image triplets,” in Proc. 4th European Conf. on Computer Vision, Cambridge, UK, Springer-Verlag, 1996, pp. 3-16.

    Google Scholar 

  3. K. Åström, “Where am I and what am I seeing? Algorithms for a Laser Guided Vehicle,” Master's Thesis, Dept. of Mathematics, Lund Institute of Technology, Sweden, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Åström, “Automatic mapmaking,” in Selected Papers from the 1st IFAC International Workshop on Intelligent Autonomous Vehicles, Southampton, UK, 18-21 April 1993, D. Charnley (Ed.), Pergamon Press, pp. 181-186.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Åström, “Invariancy methods for points, curves and surfaces in computational vision,” Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Mathematics, Lund University, Sweden, 1996a.

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. Åström, “Multilinear constraints in two-dimensional vision and isogonal conjugacy,” in Proc. Symposium on Image Analysis, Lund, Sweden, 1996b, pp. 34-38.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. Åström and M. Oskarsson, “Minimal structure and motion problems for 1D vision,” in Proc. Symposium on Image Analysis, Gothenburg, Sweden, 1999a, pp. 45-48.

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. Åström and M. Oskarsson, “Solutions and ambiguities of the structure and motion problem for 1D retinal vision,” in Proc. 11th Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis, 1999b.

  9. H.F. Baker, An Introduction to Plane Geometry, Cambridge University Press, 1943.

  10. S. Carlsson, “Duality of reconstruction and positioning from projective views,” in IEEEWorkshop on Representation ofVisual Scenes, 1995.

  11. S. Carlsson and D. Weinshall, “Dual computation of projective shape and camera positions from multiple images,” Int. Journal of Computer Vision, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 227-241, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H.S.M. Coxeter, The Real Projective Plane, 3rd edn., Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  13. O.D. Faugeras, L. Quan, and P. Sturm, “Self-calibration of a 1D projective camera and its application to the self-calibration of a 2D projective camera,” in Proc. 5th European Conf. on Computer Vision, Freiburg, Germany, 1998, pp. 36-52.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Gupta and R.I. Hartley, “Linear pushbroom cameras,” Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 19, No. 9, pp. 963-975, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K. Hyyppä, “Optical navigation system using passive identical beacons,” in Proceedings intelligent autonomous systems, Amsterdam, 1987.

  16. C.B. Madsen, C.S. Andersen, and J.S. Sørensen, “A robustness analysis of triangulation-based robot self-positioning,” in The 5th Symposium for Intelligent Robotics Systems, Stockholm, Sweden, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Neira, I. Ribeiro, and J.D. Tardos, “Mobile robot localization and map building using monocular vision,” in The 5th Symposium for Intelligent Robotics Systems, Stockholm, Sweden, 1997, pp. 275-284.

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. Quan and T. Kanade, “Affine structure from line correspondences with uncalibrated affine cameras,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 19, No. 8, pp. 834-845, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Shahsua, “Algebraic functions for recognition,” IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 17, No. 8, 1995.

  20. C. Slama (Ed.), Manual of Photogrammetry, 4th edn., American Society of Photogrammetry: Falls Church, VA, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  21. M.E. Spetsakis and J. Aloimonos,“A unified theory of structure from motion,” in Proc.DARPAIUWorkshop, 1990, pp. 271-283.

  22. B. Triggs, “Matching constraints and the joint image,” in Proc. ICCV'95, 1995, pp. 338-343.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Åström, K., Oskarsson, M. Solutions and Ambiguities of the Structure and Motion Problem for 1D Retinal Vision. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision 12, 121–135 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008362322190

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008362322190

Navigation