Skip to main content
Log in

A Bayesian Joint Mixture Framework for the Integration of Anatomical Information in Functional Image Reconstruction

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We present a Bayesian joint mixture framework for integrating anatomical image intensity and region segmentation information into emission tomographic reconstruction in medical imaging. The joint mixture framework is particularly well suited for this problem and allows us to integrate additional available information such as anatomical region segmentation information into the Bayesian model. Since this information is independently available as opposed to being estimated, it acts as a good constraint on the joint mixture model. After specifying the joint mixture model, we combine it with the standard emission tomographic likelihood. The Bayesian posterior is a combination of this likelihood and the joint mixture prior. Since well known EM algorithms separately exist for both the emission tomography (ET) likelihood and the joint mixture prior, we have designed a novel EM2 algorithm that comprises two EM algorithms—one for the likelihood and one for the prior. Despite being dove-tailed in this manner, the resulting EM2 algorithm is an alternating descent algorithm that is guaranteed to converge to a local minimum of the negative log Bayesian posterior. Results are shown on synthetic images with bias/variance plots used to gauge performance. The EM2 algorithm resulting from the joint mixture framework has the best bias/variance performance when compared with six other closely related algorithms that incorporate anatomical information to varying degrees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B.A. Ardekani, M. Braun, B.F. Hutton, I. Kanno, and H. Ida, “Minimum cross-entropy reconstruction of PET images using prior anatomical information,” Phys. Med. Biol., Vol. 41, No. 11, pp. 2497-2517, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. Bernardo and A. Smith, Bayesian Theory, John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.E. Bowsher, V.E. Johnson, T.G. Turkington, R.J. Jaszczak, and C.E. Floyd, Jr., “Bayesian reconstruction and use of anatomical a priori information for emission tomography,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., Vol. 15, No. 5, pp. 673-686, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. de Sa and D. Ballard, “Category learning through multimodality sensing,” Neural Computation, Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 1097-1118, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  5. A.P. Dempster, N.M. Laird, and D.B. Rubin, “Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm,” J. R. Statist. Soc. Ser. B, Vol. 39, pp. 1-38, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Gindi, M. Lee, A. Rangarajan, and I.G. Zubal, “Bayesian reconstruction of functional images using anatomical information as priors,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 670-680, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Gold, A. Rangarajan, and E. Mjolsness, “Learning with preknowledge: Clustering with point and graph matching distance measures,” Neural Computation, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 787-804, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  8. R. Hathaway, “Another interpretation of the EM algorithm for mixture distribution,” Statistics and Probability Letters, Vol. 4, pp. 53-56, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  9. T. Hebert and R. Leahy, “A generalized EM algorithm for 3-D Bayesian reconstruction for Poisson date using Gibbs priors,” IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 194-202, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C.H. Hsu and R. Leahy, “PET image reconstruction incorporating anatomical information using segmented regression,” in Proc. SPIE Vol. 3034: Medical Imaging-Image Processing, Newport Beach, CA, 1997, K. Hanson (Ed.), SPIE, pp. 381-392.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Leahy and X. Yan, “Incorporation of anatomical MR data for improved functional imaging with PET,” in Information Processing in Medical Imaging, D. Ortendahl and J. Llacer (Eds.), Wiley-Liss, 1991, pp. 105-120.

  12. S. Lee, I. Hsiao, and G. Gindi, “The thin plate as a regularizer in Bayesian SPECT reconstruction,” IEEE Trans Nucl. Sci., Vol. 44, No. 3, pp. 1381-1387, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. Lipinski, H. Herzog, E. Roat Kops, W. Oberschelp, and H.W. Muller-Gartner, “Expectation-maximization reconstruction of positron emission tomography images using anatomical magnetic resonance information,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 129-136, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  14. G.J. McLachlan and K.E. Basford, Mixture Models: Inference and Applications to Clustering, Marcel Dekker: New York, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  15. C.C. Meltzer, J.P. Leal, H.S. Mayberg, H.N. Wagner, Jr., and J.J. Frost, “Correction of PET data for partial volume effects in human cerebral cortex byMR imaging,” J. of Computer Assisted Tomography, Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 561-570, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. Mjolsness and C. Garrett, “Algebraic transformations of objective functions,” Neural Networks, Vol. 3, pp. 651-669, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  17. H.W. Muller-Gartner, J.M. Links, J.L. Prince, R.N. Bryan, E. McVeigh, J.P. Leal, C. Davatzikos, and J.J. Frost, “Measurement of radiotracer concentration in brain gray matter using positron emission tomography: MRI-based correction for partial volume effects,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 571-583, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  18. X. Ouyang, W.H. Wong, V.E. Johnson, X. Hu, and C.T. Chen, “Incorporation of correlated structural images in PET image reconstruction,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 627-640, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R.A. Redner and H.F. Walker, “Mixture densities, maximum likelihood and the EM algorithm,” SIAM Review, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 195-239, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  20. O.G. Rousset, Y. Ma, and A.C. Evans, “Correction of partial volume effects in PET: Principle and validation,” J. Nuc. Med., Vol. 39, No. 5, pp. 904-911, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Sastry and R.E. Carson, “Multimodality Bayesian algorithm for image reconstruction in PET: A tissue composition model,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imag., Vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 750-761, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  22. L. Shepp and Y. Vardi, “Maximum likelihood reconstruction for emission tomography,” IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 113-122, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Tenenbaum and W. Freeman, “Separating style and content,” in Advances in Neutral Information Processing Systems (NIPS), Vol. 9, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 1997, pp. 662-668.

    Google Scholar 

  24. T.O. Videen, J.S. Perlmutter, M.A. Mintun, and M.E. Raichle, “Regional correction of positron emission tomography data for the effects of cerebral atrophy,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, Vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 662-670, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  25. W. Wells III, P. Viola, H. Atsumi, S. Nakajima, and R. Kikinis, “Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information,” Medical Image Analysis, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 35-52, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  26. A.L. Yuille, P. Stolorz, and J. Utans, “Statistical physics, mixtures of distributions, and the EM algorithm,” Neural Computation, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 334-340, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Y. Zhang, J. Fessler, N. Clinthorne, and W. Rogers, “Joint estimation for incorporating MRI anatomic images into SPECT reconstruction,” in IEEE Nucl. Sci. Sym. Med. Imaging Conf., Norfolk, Virginia, USA, 1994, R. Trendler (Ed.), IEEE, pp. 1256-1260.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rangarajan, A., Hsiao, IT. & Gindi, G. A Bayesian Joint Mixture Framework for the Integration of Anatomical Information in Functional Image Reconstruction. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision 12, 199–217 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008314015446

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008314015446

Navigation