Abstract
We draw on qualitative data derived from field work on two university campuses to develop an explanation for widely disparate rates of new invention disclosure. We argue that faculty decisions to disclose are shaped by their perceptions of the benefits of patent protection. These incentives to disclose are magnified or minimized by the perceived costs of interacting with technology transfer offices and licensing professionals. Finally, faculty considerations of the costs and benefits of disclosure are colored by institutional environments that are supportive or oppositional to the simultaneous pursuit of academic and commercial endeavors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Association of University Technology Managers, Inc., 1998, AUTM Licensing Survey, Fiscal Year.
Audretsch, D.B. and P.E. Stephan, 1996, 'Company- Scientist Locational Links: The Case of Biotechnology', American Economic Rveiew 86 2, 641–652.
Blumenthal, D., E.G. Campbell, N. Causino, and K.S. Louis, 1996, 'Participation of life- science faculty in research relationships with industry', New England Journal of Medicine 335 23, 1734–1739.
Feldman, M. and F. Richard, 1994, 'The Geographic Sources of Innovation: Technological Infrastructure and Product Innovation in the United States', Annals of the Association of American Geographers 84 2, 210–229.
Nelson, R., 1993, National innovation systems: a comparative analysis, New York: Oxford University Press.
Owen- Smith, J., forthcoming, 'New Arenas for University Competition: Stratification in Academic Patenting', in Jennifer Croissant ed., University Industry Research Relations, New York: SUNY Press.
Owen- Smith, J., 2000, Public Science, Private Science: The Causes and Consequences of Patenting by Research One Unirsities. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Arizona.
Powell, W.W. and J. Owen- Smith, 1998, 'Universities and the market for intellectual property in the life sciences', Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 17 2, 253–277.
Powell, W.W., 1998, 'Learning from collaboration: Knowledge and networks in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries', California Management Review 40 3, 228–263.
Saxenian, A., 1994, Regional adäntage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Siegel, D., D. Waldman, and A. Link, 1999, 'Assessing the Impact of Organizational Practices on the Productivity of University Technology Transfer Offices: an Exploratory Study', NBER Working paper W7256.
Siegel, D., D. Waldman, L. Atwater, and A. Link, 2000, 'Transferring Scientific Knowledge from Academicians to Practitioners: Qualitative Evidence from the Commercialization of University Technology Transfer Offices', unpublished manuscript.
Stern, S., 1999, 'Do Scientists Pay to be Scientists?' NBER Working paper a7410.
Zucker, L.G. and M.R. Darby, 1996, 'Star Scientists and Institutional Transformation: Patterns of Invention and Innovation in the Formation of the U.S. Biotechnology Industry', Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 93 23, 709–716.
Zucker, L.G., M.R. Darby, and M.B. Brewer, 1998, 'Intellectual Human Capital and the Birth of U.S. Biotechnology Enterprises', American Economic Review 88 1, 290–306.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Owen-Smith, J., Powell, W.W. To Patent or Not: Faculty Decisions and Institutional Success at Technology Transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer 26, 99–114 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007892413701
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007892413701