Abstract
We analyzed the ecological conditions that may favor a habitat selection process in which later arriving individuals (colonists) use the presence of earlier established species (residents) as a cue to profitable breeding sites (heterospecific attraction). In our model, colonists assessing potential breeding patches could select between high-quality source and low-quality sink patches. A proportion of the source patches were occupied by residents. Colonists could either directly sample the relative quality of the patches (termed samplers) or, alternatively, they could also use residents as a cue of patch quality (cue-users). Cue-users gained benefit from lowered costs when assessing occupied source patches. The cue-using strategy is an efficient way to choose the best possible patch not only when interspecific competition is intense, but also when benefits from social aggregation exceed the effects of competition. High relative cost of sampling empty patches increases the fitness of the cue-using strategy relative to samplers. The strongest attraction to heterospecifics was predicted when the benefit from aggregating with residents exceeded the effects of competition, and approximately half of the landscape consisted of occupied, high-quality source patches.
References
Alexander, R.D. (1974) The evolution of social behavior. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5, 325–383.
Blondel, J. (1985) Habitat selection in island birds. In M.L. Cody (ed.), Habitat selection in birds, pp. 477–511. Academic Press, New York.
Brown, J.S. and Pavlovic, N.B. (1992) Evolution in heterogeneous environments: effects of migration on habitat selection. Evol. Ecol. 6, 360–382.
Caraco, T., and Pulliam, H.R. (1984) Sociality and survivorship in animals exposed to predation. In P.W. Price, C.N. Slobodchikoff, and W.S. Gaud (eds), A New Ecology, pp. 279–309. Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.
Cody, M.L. (1978) Habitat selection and interspecific territoriality among sylviid warblers of England and Sweden. Ecol. Monogr. 48, 351–396.
Cooper, W.S. (1981) Natural decision theory: A general formalism for the analysis of evolved characteristics. J. Theor. Biol. 92, 401–415.
Cooper, W.S., and Kaplan, R.H. (1982) Adaptive “coin-flipping”: a decision-theoretic examination of natural selection for random individual variation. J. Theor. Biol. 94, 135–151.
Dall, S.R.X., and Cuthill, I.C. (1997) The information costs of generalism. Oikos 80, 197–202.
Danielson, B.J. (1991) Communities in a landscape: the influence of habitat heterogeneity on the interactions between species. Am. Nat. 138, 1105–1120.
Danielson, B.J. (1992) Habitat selection, interspecific interactions and landscape composition. Evol. Ecol. 6, 399–411.
Elmberg, J., Pöysä, H., Sjöberg, K., and Nummi, P. (1997) Interspecific interactions and co-existence in dabbling ducks: observations and an experiment. Oecologia 111, 129–136.
Forsman, J.T., Mönkkönen, M., Inkeröinen, J. and Reunanen, P. (1998a) Aggregate dispersion of birds after encountering a predator: experimental evidence. J. Avian Biol. 29, 44–48.
Forsman, J.T., Mönkkönen, M., Helle, P. and Inkeröinen, J. (1998b) Heterospecific attraction and food resources in migrants' breeding patch selection in northern boreal forest. Oecologia 115, 278–286.
Harvey, P.H., Stenning, M.J., and Campbell, B. (1985) Individual variation in seasonal breeding success of Pied flycatchers (Ficedula hypoleuca). J. Anim. Ecol. 54, 391–398.
Janetos, A.C. (1980) Strategies of female mate choice: a theoretical analysis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 7, 107–112.
Latta, S.C., and Wunderle, J.M. (1996) The composition and foraging ecology of mixed-species flocks in pine forests of Hispaniola. Condor 98, 595–607.
Levins, R. (1968) Evolution in changing environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Lima, S.L., and Zollner, P.A. (1996) Towards a behavioral ecology of ecological landscapes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11, 131–135.
Mönkkönen, M., Helle, P., and Soppela, K. (1990) Numerical and behavioural responses of migrant passerines to experimental manipulation of resident tits (Parus spp.): heterospecific attraction in northern breeding bird communities? Oecologia 85, 218–225.
Mönkkönen, M., Forsman, J.T., and Helle, P. (1996) Mixed-species foraging aggregations and heterospecific attraction in boreal bird communities. Oikos 77, 127–136.
Mönkkönen, M., Helle, P., Niemi, G.J., and Montgomery, K. (1997) Heterospecific attraction affects community structure and migrant abundances in northern breeding bird communities. Can. J. Zool. 75, 2077–2083.
Morris, D.W. (1987) Spatial scale and the cost of density-dependent habitat selection. Evol. Ecol. 1, 379–388.
Morris, D.W. (1990) Temporal variation, habitat selection and community structure. Oikos 59, 303–312.
Morris, D.W. (1995) Habitat selection in mosaic landscapes. In L. Hansson, L. Fahrig, and G. Merriam (eds), Mosaic landscapes and ecological processes, pp. 110–135. Chapman & Hall, London
Morse, D.H. (1977) Feeding behavior and predator avoidance in heterospecific groups. BioScience 27, 332–339.
Pimm, S.L., and Rosenzweig, M.L. (1981) Competitors and habitat use. Oikos 37, 1–6.
Pulliam, H.R. (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am. Nat. 132, 652–661.
Pulliam, H.R., and Danielson, B.J. (1991) Sources, sinks, and habitat selection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics. Am. Nat. 137, S50-S66.
Reed, T.M. (1982) Interspecific territoriality in the chaffinch and great tit on islands and the mainland of Scotland: playback and removal experiments. Anim. Behav. 30, 171–180.
Robinson, S.K., and Terborgh, J. (1995) Interspecific aggression and habitat selection by Amazonian birds. J. Anim. Ecol. 64, 1–11.
Rosenzweig, M.L. (1985) Some theoretical aspects of habitat selection. In M.L. Cody (ed.), Habitat selection in birds, pp. 517–540. Academic Press, Orlando.
Timonen, S., Mönkkönen, M., and Orell, M. (1994) Does competition with residents affect the distribution of migrant territories? Ornis Fennica 71, 55–60.
Wittenberger, J.F. (1983) Tactics of mate choice. In P. Bateson (ed.), Mate choice, pp. 435–447. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mönkkönen, M., Härdling, R., Forsman, J.T. et al. Evolution of heterospecific attraction: using other species as cues in habitat selection. Evolutionary Ecology 13, 93–106 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006590215306
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006590215306