Skip to main content
Log in

Coercion, Guidance and Mercifulness: The Different Influences of Ethics Programs on Decision-Making

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of an ethics program is a method frequently used for organising responsible behaviour within organisations. For such a program, certain preconditions have to be created in the structure, culture and strategy. In this organisational context, managers have to take their decisions in a responsible way. This process of decision-making, embedded in an ethics program, is the main focus of this article. Ethics programs often influence decision-making in a formal way; certain norms and types of behaviour are formalised and controlled within the organisation. Subsequently, individual managers have to infer the meaning of responsible behaviour from the demands laid down in the ethics program. Such a formal ethics program has some important advantages but the dangers of such an approach are often ignored. This article discusses both the advantages and disadvantages of a formal ethics program and adds two alternative ways of stimulating responsible behaviour in the organisation. In a monological approach the reflections of the decision makers on their own values are central in differentiating between right and wrong. In a dialogical approach, the communications between decision makers and other stakeholders involved are the foundations for determining a responsible solution. Because each approach is appropriate for certain issues, a well-chosen combination is justified. Such an ethics program should be strict on certain issues but leave room for reflection and interaction on other issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  • Adams, G. B. and D. L. Balfour: 1998, Unmasking Administrative Evil (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, M.: 1988, ‘The Critical Path for Change; Keys to Success and Failure in Six Companies’, in R. H. Kilmann and T. J. Covin (eds.), Corporate Transformation ( Jossey-Bass, San Francisco), pp. 17–45.

  • Boje, D. M. and R. D. Winsor: 1993, ‘The Resurrection of Taylorism: Total Quality Management's Hidden Agenda’, Journal of Organisational Change 6(4), 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brighley, S.: 1995, ‘Business Ethics in Context; Researching with Case Studies’, Journal of Business Ethics 14, 219–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, A. Y. S., R. B. Sawyer and P. F. Williams: 1997, ‘Reinforcing Ethical Decision-Making throug Corporate Culture’, Journal of Business Ethics 167, 855–865.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. L. M. and D. Ahlstrom: 1995, ‘Seeking the Institutional Balance of Power; Avoiding the Power of a Balanced View’, Academy of Management Review 20(1), 171–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C.: 1982, In a Different Voice (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C.: 1995, ‘Moral Orientation and Moral Development, Oorspronkelijk verschenen in 1987’, in Virginia Held (ed.), Justice and Care: Essential Coercion, Guidance and Mercifulness 41 Readings in Feminist Ethics (Westview Press of HaperCollins Publishers, Colorado), pp. 31–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hekman, S.: 1995, Moral Voices, Moral Selves; Carol Gilligan and Feminist Moral Theory (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummels, H.: 1998, ‘Organizing Ethics: A Stakeholder Debate’, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1403–1419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagger, A. M.: 1995, ‘Caring as a Feminist Practice of Moral Reason’, in Virginia Held (ed.), Justice and Care: Essential readings in Feminist Ethics (Westview Press of HaperCollins Publishers, Colorado), pp. 179–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I.: 1982, Groupthink, 2nd edn. (Houghton-Mofflin, Boston).

  • Kaptein, M.: 1998, Ethics Management (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht).

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, G. and A. Nijhof: 1998, ‘Collective Responsibility; A Framework for Developing an Ethical Climate in Organisations’, Working Paper, Accepted for publication in Leadership and Organisational Development Journal, MCB Publishers.

  • Morgan, R. B.: 1993, ‘Self-and Co-Worker Perceptions of Ethics and Their Relationships to Leadership and Salary’, Academy of Management Journal 36(1), 200–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijhof, A. and O. Fisscher: 1997, ‘Dealing with Ethical Dilemma's in Organizational Change Processes’, International Journal of Value Based Management 10 (Kluwer Academic Publishers), 173–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijhof, A.: 1999, Met zorg besluiten, een studie naar morele afwegingen van leidinggevenden bij organisatieveranderingen (Samsom publishers, University of Twente, Enschede).

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine, L. S.: 1994, ‘Managing for Organizational Integrity’, Harvard Business Review (March-April), 106–117.

  • Pettigrew, A. and R. Whipp: 1991, Managing Change for Competitive Success (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinmann, H. and A. Löhr: 1996, ‘A Republican Concept of Corporate Ethics’, in S. Urban (ed.), Europe's Challenges; Economic Efficiency and Social Solidarity (Gabler, Wiesbaden), pp. 21–61.

  • Weaver, G. R., L. K. Trevino and P. L. Cochran: 1999, ‘Corporate Ethics Programs as Control Systems; Influences of Executive Commitment and Environmental Factors’, Academy of Management Journal 42(1), 41–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willmott, H.: 1993, ‘Strength is Ignorance; Slavery is Freedom: Managing Culture in Modern Organizations’, Journal of Management Studies 30(4), 515–552.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nijhof, A., Fisscher, O. & Looise, J.K. Coercion, Guidance and Mercifulness: The Different Influences of Ethics Programs on Decision-Making. Journal of Business Ethics 27, 33–42 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006413308607

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006413308607

Navigation