Skip to main content
Log in

PHILOSOPHY OF MEDICAL PRACTICE: A DISCURSIVE APPROACH

  • Published:
Theoretical Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In spite of the seminal work A Philosophical Basis of Medical Practice, the debate on the task and goals of philosophy of medicine still continues. From an European perspective it is argued that the main topics dealt with by Pellegrino and Thomasma are still particularly relevant to medical practice as a healing practice, while expressing the need for a philosophy of medicine. Medical practice is a discursive practice which is highly influenced by other discursive practices like science, law and economics. Philosophical analysis of those influences is needed to discern their effect on the goals of medicine and on the ways in which the self-image of man may be changed. The nature of medical practice and discourse itself makes it necessary to include different philosophical disciplines, like philosophy of science, of law, ethics, and epistemology. Possible scenario's of euthanasia and the human genome project in the USA and Europe are used to exemplify how philosopy of medicine can contribute to a realistic understanding of the problems which are related to the goals of medicine and health care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Pellegrino ED, Thomasma DC. A Philosophical Basis ofMedical Practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Caplan AL. Does the philosophy of medicine exist? Theor Med 1992; 13(1): 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pellegrino, Thomasma: xiv.

  4. Ibid: xiv.

  5. Ibid: 86.

  6. Plato, Apologia. 22cd. Cf. Gadamer H. Wahrheitund Methode. Tubingen: Mohr, 1960; 298.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ibid: 291.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aristotle. Ethica Nicomacheia, Z 8.

  9. Foucault M. L'Archeologydu Savoir. Paris: Gallimard, 1969: 45–67.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Arney WR, Bergen BJ. Medicine and the Management of the Living. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987: 5.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hunter KM. Doctor's Stories. Princeton: PUP, 1991: 5–11.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mischler EG. The Discourse of Medicine.Norwood NJ: Ablex Publishing Corportion, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Arney, Bergen,1987, loc. cit.

  14. Illich I. Medical Nemesis. The Expropriation of Health.London: Marion Boyars, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dreyfus HL, Rabinow P, eds.Michel Foucault. Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pellegrino, Thomasma: 74–75.

  17. Gebsattel VE von. Zur Sinnstruktur der arztlichen Handlung. In: Rothschuh KE, Was ist Krankheit? Darmstadt: WB, 1975: 252–254.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rotschuh KE. Der Krankheitsbegriff. In: Rothschuh KE, ed. Was ist Krankheit? Darmstadt: WB, 1975: 414.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Broekman JM.Ziektebeelden. Leuven: Peeters, 1993: 108–118.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Illich: 144ff.

  21. Achterhuis H, Goud J, Koerselman F, Otten WJ, Schalken T. Als de dood voor het leven. Over professionel hulp bij zelfmoord. Amsterdam: GA van Oorschot, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Leeuwen E. van. A case-study in bioethics: In:Soteman A, Voorzanger B, Musschenga AWM, Morality, Worldview and Law. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1992: 283–297.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kalf JH. Spruijt-Metz DD. Variation in diagnoses: influence of specialist's training on selecting and ranking relevant information in geriatic case vignettes. Social Science and Medicine 1996; 42(5): 705–712.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Leeuwen, E., Kimsma, G.K. PHILOSOPHY OF MEDICAL PRACTICE: A DISCURSIVE APPROACH. Theor Med Bioeth 18, 99–112 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005753305407

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005753305407

Navigation