Abstract
In spite of the seminal work A Philosophical Basis of Medical Practice, the debate on the task and goals of philosophy of medicine still continues. From an European perspective it is argued that the main topics dealt with by Pellegrino and Thomasma are still particularly relevant to medical practice as a healing practice, while expressing the need for a philosophy of medicine. Medical practice is a discursive practice which is highly influenced by other discursive practices like science, law and economics. Philosophical analysis of those influences is needed to discern their effect on the goals of medicine and on the ways in which the self-image of man may be changed. The nature of medical practice and discourse itself makes it necessary to include different philosophical disciplines, like philosophy of science, of law, ethics, and epistemology. Possible scenario's of euthanasia and the human genome project in the USA and Europe are used to exemplify how philosopy of medicine can contribute to a realistic understanding of the problems which are related to the goals of medicine and health care.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Pellegrino ED, Thomasma DC. A Philosophical Basis ofMedical Practice. New York: Oxford University Press, 1981.
Caplan AL. Does the philosophy of medicine exist? Theor Med 1992; 13(1): 67–79.
Pellegrino, Thomasma: xiv.
Ibid: xiv.
Ibid: 86.
Plato, Apologia. 22cd. Cf. Gadamer H. Wahrheitund Methode. Tubingen: Mohr, 1960; 298.
Ibid: 291.
Aristotle. Ethica Nicomacheia, Z 8.
Foucault M. L'Archeologydu Savoir. Paris: Gallimard, 1969: 45–67.
Arney WR, Bergen BJ. Medicine and the Management of the Living. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987: 5.
Hunter KM. Doctor's Stories. Princeton: PUP, 1991: 5–11.
Mischler EG. The Discourse of Medicine.Norwood NJ: Ablex Publishing Corportion, 1984.
Arney, Bergen,1987, loc. cit.
Illich I. Medical Nemesis. The Expropriation of Health.London: Marion Boyars, 1975.
Dreyfus HL, Rabinow P, eds.Michel Foucault. Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.
Pellegrino, Thomasma: 74–75.
Gebsattel VE von. Zur Sinnstruktur der arztlichen Handlung. In: Rothschuh KE, Was ist Krankheit? Darmstadt: WB, 1975: 252–254.
Rotschuh KE. Der Krankheitsbegriff. In: Rothschuh KE, ed. Was ist Krankheit? Darmstadt: WB, 1975: 414.
Broekman JM.Ziektebeelden. Leuven: Peeters, 1993: 108–118.
Illich: 144ff.
Achterhuis H, Goud J, Koerselman F, Otten WJ, Schalken T. Als de dood voor het leven. Over professionel hulp bij zelfmoord. Amsterdam: GA van Oorschot, 1995.
Leeuwen E. van. A case-study in bioethics: In:Soteman A, Voorzanger B, Musschenga AWM, Morality, Worldview and Law. Assen: Van Gorcum, 1992: 283–297.
Kalf JH. Spruijt-Metz DD. Variation in diagnoses: influence of specialist's training on selecting and ranking relevant information in geriatic case vignettes. Social Science and Medicine 1996; 42(5): 705–712.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Leeuwen, E., Kimsma, G.K. PHILOSOPHY OF MEDICAL PRACTICE: A DISCURSIVE APPROACH. Theor Med Bioeth 18, 99–112 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005753305407
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005753305407