Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluating the benefits of a combined route guidance and road pricing system in a traffic network with recurrent congestion

  • Published:
Transportation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When drivers do not have complete information on road travel time and thus choose their routes in a stochastic manner or based on their previous experience, separate implementations of either route guidance or road pricing cannot drive a stochastic network flow pattern towards a system optimum in a Wardropian sense. It is thus of interest to consider a combined route guidance and road pricing system. A road guidance system could reduce drivers' uncertainty of travel time through provision of traffic information. A driver who is equipped with a guidance system could be assumed to receive complete information, and hence be able to find the minimum travel time routes in a user-optimal manner, while marginal-cost road pricing could drive a user-optimal flow pattern toward a system optimum. Therefore, a joint implementation of route guidance and road pricing in a network with recurrent congestion could drive a stochastic network flow pattern towards a system optimum, and thus achieve a higher reduction in system travel time. In this paper the interaction between route guidance and road pricing is modeled and the potential benefit of their joint implementation is evaluated based on a mixed equilibrium traffic assignment model. The private and system benefits under marginal-cost pricing and varied levels of market penetration of the information systems are investigated with a small and a large example. It is concluded that the two technologies complement each other and that their joint implementation can reduce travel time more efficiently in a network with recurrent congestion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  • Akamatsu T & Kuwahara M (1988) Optimal road pricing under stochastic user equilibrium. Proceedings of the Japan Society of Civil Engineers289/IV-8: 121–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnott R, De Palama A & Lindsey R (1991) Does providing information to drivers reduce traffic congestion? Transportation Research25A: 309–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnott R, de Palma A & Lindsey R (1995) Recent developments in the bottleneck model. Research Paper No. 95–11, Department of Economics, University of Alberta.

  • Ben-Akiva M, De Palma A & Kaysi I (1991) Dynamic network models and driver information systems. Transportation Research25A: 251–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett LD (1993) The existence of equivalent mathematical programs for certain mixed equi-librium traffic assignment problems. European Journal of Operational Research71: 177–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonsall PW, Pickup L & Stathopoulos A (1991) Measuring behavioural responses to road transport informatics. In: Advanced Telmatics in Road Transport(pp. 1457–1487). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Codina E & Barcelo J (1995) Dynamic traffic assignment: considerations on some determin-istic modeling approaches. Annals of Operations Research60: 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Palma A & Lindsey R (1992) The potential benefits of a combined route guidance and road pricing system: an economic analysis. Internal working paper.

  • Dial RB (1971) A probabilistic multipath traffic assignment algorithm which obviates path enumeration. Transportation Research5: 83–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmerink RHM, Nijkamp P, Rietveld P & Axhausen KW (1994) The economics of motorist information systems revisited. Transport Review14: 363–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmerink RHM, Axhausen KW, Nijkamp P & Rietveld P (1995a) Effects of information in road transport networks with recurrent congestion. Transportation22: 21–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmerink RHM, Axhausen KW, Nijkamp P & Rietveld P (1995b) The potential of informa-tion provision in a simulated road transport network with non-recurrent congestion. Transportation Research3C, 293–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari P (1995) Road pricing and network equilibrium. Transportation Research29B: 357–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari P (1997) Capacity constraints in urban transport networks. Transportation Research 31B: 291–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghali MO & Smith MJ (1992) Road pricing: a new model for assessing the many options. Traffic Engineering and Control33: 156–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall RW (1993) Non-recurrent congestion: how big is the problem? Are traveler information systems the solution? Transportation Research1C: 89–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall RW (1996) Route choice and advanced traveler information system on a capacitated and dynamic network. Transportation Research4C: 289–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harker PT (1988) Multiple equilibrium behaviors in networks. Transportation Science22: 39–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang HJ & Yang H (1996) A variable trans-modal transport pricing model. Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, The Hong Kong of Science and Technology (working paper).

  • Jayakrishnan R, Mahmassani HS & Hu TY (1994) An evaluation tool for advanced traffic information and management systems in urban networks. Transportation Research2C: 129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanafani A & Al-Deek H (1991) A simple model for route guidance benefits. Transportation Research25B: 191–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koutsopoulos HN & Lotan T (1990) Motorist information systems and recurrent traffic congestion: sensitivity analysis of expected results. Transportation Research Record1281: 145–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher MJ & Hughes PC (1995) Estimation of the potential benefits from an ATT system using a multiple user class stochastic user equilibrium assignment model. In: Stephanedes YJ & Filippi F (eds.), Application of Advanced Technologies in Transportation Engineering(pp. 700–704), ASCE.

  • Mahmassani H & Jayakrishnan R (1991) System performance and user response under realtime information in a congested traffic corridor. Transportation Research25A: 293–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meland S (1995) Generalized and advanced urban debiting innovations: the GAUDI project (part 3), Trondheim toll ring. Traffic Engineering and Control36(3): 150–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeta S & Mahmassani H (1995) Multiple user classes real-time traffic assignment for online operations: a rolling horizon solution framework. Transportation Research3C: 83–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy P, Yang H, Vaughn KM, Abdel-Aty MA, Kitamura R & Jovamis P (1995) Design of an artificial simulator for analyzing route choice behavior in the presence of information system. Mathematical and Computer Modeling22: 119–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheffi Y (1985) Urban transportation networks: equilibrium analysis with mathematical programming methods. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanhouri IE (1994) Evaluating the joint implementation of congestion pricing and driver information systems, PhD Dissertation, MIT.

  • Smith TE, Eriksson EA & Lindberg PO (1994) Existence of optimal tolls under conditions of stochastic user-equilibria. In: Johansson B & Mattsson LG (eds), Road pricing: theory, empirical assessment and policy(pp. 65–87). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  • Van Vuren T & Smart MB (1990) Route guidance and road pricing – problems, practicalities and possibilities. Transport Review10: 269–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vuren T & Watling DP (1991) A multiple user class assignment model for route guidance. Transportation Research Record1306: 22–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Vuren T, Van Vliet D & Smith MJ (1989) Combined equilibirum in a network with partial route guidance. In: Yagar S & Rowe SE (eds), Traffic control methods(pp. 375–387). New York: Engineering Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang H (1997) System optimum, stochastic user equilibrium and optimal link tolls. Transportation Science(in press).

  • Yang H (1998) Multiple equilibrium behavior and advanced traveler information systems with endogenous market penetration. Transportation Research32B: 205–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang H & Bell MGH (1997) Traffic restraint, road pricing and network equilibrium. Transportation Research31B: 303–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang H & Huang HJ (1998) Principle of marginal-cost pricing: how does it work in a general road network? Transportation Research32A: 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Kitamura R, Jovanis P, Vaughn KM & Abdel-Aty MA (1993) Exploration of route choice behavior with advanced travel information using neural network concept. Transportation20: 199–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang H & Lam WHK (1996) Optimal road tolls under conditions of queuing and congestion. Transportation Research30A: 319–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang H & Meng Q (1998) Departure time, route choice and congestion tolls in a queuing network with elastic-demand. Transportation Research32B: 247–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watling D (1994) Urban traffic network models and dynamic driver information systems. Transport Review14: 219–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J (1994) Traffic assignment models dealing with multiple user classes. PhD Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science & Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, P.R. China (E-mail

    Hai Yang

Authors
  1. Hai Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yang, H. Evaluating the benefits of a combined route guidance and road pricing system in a traffic network with recurrent congestion. Transportation 26, 299–322 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005129309812

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005129309812

Search

Navigation