Abstract
Three definitions of ``quality'' have entered the qualityassurance (QA) debate: quality as value for money, quality as fitfor the purpose of the institution, quality as transforming. The firstis pivotal for retrospective QA, which sees QA in terms ofaccountability, and conforming to externally imposed standards. The lasttwo are pivotal for prospective QA, which sees QA asmaintaining and enhancing the quality of teaching and learning in theinstitution. In this paper, the reflective practitioner is taken as themodel for prospective QA. Three stages are involved in institutionalreflective practice: articulating an espoused theory of teaching, thequality model (QM); continually improving on current practicethrough quality enhancement (QE), in which staff development should playan important role; and making quality feasible (QF), by removingimpediments to good teaching, which often arise through distortedpriorities in institutional policy and procedures. These three stages,QM, QE, and QF, are essential ingredients in prospective QA.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alverno College Faculty (1994). Student Assessment-as-Learning at Alverno College. Milwaukee: Alverno College Institute.
Biggs, J.B. (1996a). ‘Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment’, Higher Education 32, 347–364.
Biggs, J.B. (1996b). ‘Assessing learning quality: Reconciling institutional, staff, and educa-tional demands’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 21, 3–15.
Biggs, J.B. (ed.) (1996c). Testing: To Educate or to Select? Education in Hong Kong at the Crossroads. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Educational Publishing Co.
Biggs, J.B. (1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: Open Univer-sity Press.
Biggs, J.B. and Collis, K.F. (1982). Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.
Borko, H. and Livingston, C. (1989). ‘Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathem-atics instruction by expert and novice teachers’, American Educational Research Journal 26, 473–498.
Bowden, J. and Marton, F. (1998). The University of Learning. London: Kogan Page.
Boyer, E.L. (1990). Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities for the Professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advabncement of Teaching.
Coady, T. (ed.) (2000). Why Universities Matter. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Cole, N.S. (1990). ‘Conceptions of educational achievement’, Educational Researcher 18(3), 2–7.
Cowan, J. (1999). On Becoming an Innovative University Teacher: Reflection in Action. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Crooks, T.J. (1988). ‘The impact of classroom evaluation practices on students’, Review of Educational Research 58, 438–481.
Dawkins, J. (1987). Higher Education; a Policy Discussion Paper. Canberra, Australian Government Printing Office.
Dunkin, M. and Precians, R. (1992). ‘Award-winning university teachers' concepts of teaching’, Higher Education 24, 483–502.
Elliott, J. (1991). Action Research for Educational Change. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Frederiksen, J.R. and Collins, A. (1989). ‘A systems approach to educational testing’, Educational Researcher 18(9), 27–32.
Goodlad, S. (1995). The Quest for Quality: 16 Forms of Heresy in Higher Education. Buckingham: Open University Press and The Society for Research into Higher Education.
Harvey, L. and Green, D. (1993). ‘Defining quality’, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 18, 8–35.
Hong Kong University Grants Committee (2000). Letter to Universities (2 May, 2000).
Jarratt Report (1985). Report of the Steering Committee for Efficiency Studies in Universities. London: Committee of Vice-Chancellors and Principals.
Kember, D. (2000). Action Learning and Action Research: Improving the Quality of Teaching and Learning. London: Kogan Page.
Kember, D. and Wong, A. (2000). ‘Implications for evaluation from a study of students' perceptions of good and poor teaching’, Higher Education 39, 69–97.
Liston, C. (1999). Managing Quality and Standards. Buckingham: Open University Press.
McGregor, D. (1960). The Human Side of Enterprise. New York: McGraw Hill.
Mentowski, M. (2000). Learning that Lasts. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Prosser, M. and Trigwell, K. (1998). Teaching for Learning in Higher Education. Buck-ingham: Open University Press.
Schon, D.A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. London: Temple Smith.
Seymour, D.T. (1993). On Q: Causing Quality in Higher Education. Phoenix, AZ: The Oryx Press.
Stigler, J. and Hiebert, J. (1999). The Teaching Gap. New York: The Free Press.
Shuell, T.J. (1986). ‘Cognitive conceptions of learning’, Review of Educational Research 56, 411–436.
Taylor, C. (1994). ‘Assessment for measurement or standards: The peril and promise of large scale assessment reform’, American Educational Research Journal 31, 231–262.
Tyler, R.W. (1949). Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ware, J. and Williams, R.G. (1975). ‘The Dr. Fox Effect: a study of lecturer effectiveness and ratings of instruction’, Journal of Medical Education 50, 149–156.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Biggs, J. The reflective institution: Assuring and enhancing the quality of teaching and learning. Higher Education 41, 221–238 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004181331049
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004181331049