Dissolution of Gallbladder Stones with Methyl tert-Butyl Ether and Stone Recurrence (A European Survey)

Abstract

Since there are now several ways to treatsymptomatic gallstone disease, one is able to selecttreatment on the basis of the patient's comfort, thepracticability, effectiveness, and side effects of the technique, and the relative costs. In order toassess the present status of contact dissolution withmethyl tert-butyl ether with regard to these aspects,the present enquiry reports the data of 21 European hospitals. Eight hundred three patients wereselected for contact litholysis of cholesterolgallbladder stones using methyl tert-butyl ether.Percutaneous transhepatic puncture of the gallbladderwas performed under x-ray or ultrasound guidance. Dissolutionrate, side effects, and treatment times of 268 patientsfrom one single center were compared to those of 535patients from the other 20 centers. Two hundred sixty-four patients were followed for fiveyears to assess stone recurrence. Physicians were askedhow they assessed the expenditure of the method, thediscomfort to the patients, and the staffing situation. Patients were asked to indicate theiracceptance on an analog scale. Puncture was successfulin 761 (94.8%) patients. Prophylactic administration ofantibiotics was not necessary. Stones were dissolved in 724 (95.1%) patients. In 315 (43.5%) sludgeremained in the gallbladder. The most severecomplication was bile leakage, which led 12 (1.6%)patients to have elective cholecystectomy. Toxicinjuries due to the ether were not reported.Methodrelated lethality amounted to 0%, 30-day-lethalityto 0.4%. Stone recurrence rate was about 40% in solitarystones and about 70% in multiple stones over five years. Patients with multiple stones developedrecurrent stones almost twice as often as those withsolitary stones. The probability of stone recurrence inpatients with sludge in the gallbladder after catheter removal was not statistically significantlydifferent from those without sludge. Seventy to 90% ofthe centers found the puncture to be simple and notdistressing for patients and the relation betweenexpenditure and therapeutic success to be acceptable. Theacceptance of contact litholysis by the patients wasexcellent. Contact litholysis when applied by anexperienced team provides real advantages in thetreatment of gallstone disease. The method is technicallysimple, well accepted by the patients, and can be easilyapplied in community hospitals. Contact litholysis maybe of particular value in patients who are not suitable for anesthesia orsurgery.