Skip to main content
Log in

Developing Motivation and Cognitive Learning Strategies Through an Undergraduate Learning Community

  • Published:
Learning Environments Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study describes the effects on student motivation and cognitive learning strategies of an approach involving an undergraduate learner-centered community of learners approach to instruction. Six learning communities were created using the following objectives: integrated courses, active and collaborative learning, and opportunities for learning through information technology and library resources. Instructors attended ten workshops designed to assist them in developing the learning communities according to the objectives of the program. Results indicate significant changes in motivation and cognitive strategy use by the end of participation in the learning community. Within the motivation subscales, students in the learning communities reported significantly higher levels of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, more internal control of their learning, and self-efficacy, along with significantly lower levels of test anxiety and task value. Within the learning strategies subscales, students reported increases in their use of rehearsal strategies, organization strategies, critical thinking, time management, and the use of peer learning and help-seeking behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • American College Student Personnel Association. (1994). The student learning imperative: Implications for student affairs. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 261-271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25, 297-308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. (1997). What matters in college?: Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N. (1988). Motivational factors in students' approaches to learning. In R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles: Perspectives on individual differences (pp. 21-51). New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabelnick, F., MacGregor, J., Matthews, R., & Smith, B. L. (1990). Learning communities: Building connections among disciplines, students, and faculty (New Directions for Teaching and Learning, No. 41). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, P. (1991). Summer Bridge: Improving retention rates for underprepared students. Journal of the Freshman Year Experience, 3(2), 91-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P. (1985, October). The rationale for learning communities and learning community models. Paper presented at the Inaugural Conference on Learning Communities of the Washington Center for Improving the Quality of Undergraduate Education, Olympia, WA.

  • Kellogg Commission on the Future of State and Land-Grant Universities. (1977). Returning to our roots: The student experience. Washington, DC: National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, P. M., & Baxter Magolda, M. B. (1999). A developmental perspective on learning. Journal of College Student Development, 40, 599-609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Love, A. G. (1994). Learning communities fall 1993 evaluation report. Unpublished report, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1981). Residence arrangement, student-faculty relationships, and freshman-year educational outcomes. Journal of College Student Personnel, 22, 147-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. (1991). How college affects students. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In C. Ames & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation enhancing environments (Vol. 6, pp. 117-160). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & Garcia, T. (1991). Student goal orientation and self-regulation in the college classroom. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Goals and self-regulatory processes (Vol. 7, pp. 371-402). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & Schrauben, B. (1992). Students' motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom tasks. In D. Schunk & J. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom: Causes and consequences (pp. 149-183). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Post-Secondary Teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G. R. (1999). The effects of residential learning communities and traditional residential living arrangements on educational gains during the first year of college. Journal of College Student Development, 40, 269-284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pike, G. R., Schroeder, C. C., & Berry, T. R. (1997). Enhancing the educational impact of residence halls: The relationship between residential learning communities and first-year college experiences and persistence. Journal of College Student Development, 38, 609-621.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. L. (1993). Creating learning communities. Liberal Education, Fall, 32-39.

  • Stage, F. (1989). Reciprocal effects between the academic and social integration of college students. Research in Higher Education, 30, 517-530.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1997). Classrooms as communities: Exploring the educational character of student persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 68, 599-623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V. (1998). Colleges as communities: Taking research on student persistence seriously. The Review of Higher Education, 21, 167-177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, V., & Goodsell, A. (1994). Freshmen interest groups and the first year experience: Constructing student communities in a large university. Journal of the Freshmen Year Experience, 6, 7-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Zile-Tamsen, C., & Livingston, J. A. (1999). The differential impact of motivation on the self-regulated strategy use of high-and low-achieving college students. Journal of College Student Development, 40(1), 54-59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer, R. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. Wittrock (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching and learning (pp. 315-327). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolters, C., Yu, S., & Pintrich, P. R.(1996). The relation between goal orientation and students' motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 211-238.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stefanou, C.R., Salisbury-Glennon, J.D. Developing Motivation and Cognitive Learning Strategies Through an Undergraduate Learning Community. Learning Environments Research 5, 77–97 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015610606945

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015610606945

Navigation