Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Converging evidence for the concept of orthographic processing

  • Published:
Reading and Writing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Six different measures of orthographic processing (three different letter string choice tasks, two orthographic choice tasks, and a homophone choice task) were administered to thirty-nine children who had also been administered the word recognition subtest of the Metropolitan Achievement Test and a comprehensive battery of tasks assessing phonological processing skill (four measures of phonological sensitivity, nonword repetition, and pseudoword reading). The six orthographic tasks displayed moderate convergence – forming one reasonably coherent factor. Hierarchical regression analyses indicated that a composite measure of orthographic processing skill predicted variance in word recognition after variance accounted for by the phonological processing measures had been partialed out. A measure of print exposure predictedvariance in orthographic processing after the variance in phonologicalprocessing had been partialed out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barker, K., Torgesen, J.K. & Wagner, R.K. (1992). The role of orthographic processing skills on five different reading tasks, Reading Research Quarterly 27: 334-345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, R. (1986). Word recognition in early reading: A review of the direct and indirect access hypothesis, Cognition 24: 93-119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. (ed.) (1994). Varieties of orthographic knowledge: Theoretical and developmental issues (Vol. 1). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, V. (ed.) (1995). Varieties of orthographic knowledge: Theoretical and developmental issues (Vol. 2). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, L. & Bryant, P.E. (1978). Difficulties in auditory organization as a possible cause of reading backwardness, Nature 271: 746-747.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, S. & Shankweiler, D. (eds.) (1991). Phonological processes in literacy. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braten, I., Lie, R., Andreassen, R. & Olaussen, B.S. (1999). Leisure time reading and orthographic processes in word recognition among Norwegian third-and fourth-grade students. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 11: 65-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, D. (1964). The analysis of word sounds by young children, British Journal of Educational Psychology 34: 158-170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, P. & Impey, L. (1986). The similarities between normal readers and developmental and acquired dyslexics, Cognition 24: 121-137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calfee, R., Chapman, R. & Venezky, R. (1972). How a child needs to think to learn to read. In: L.W. Gregg (ed.), Cognition in learning and memory (pp. 139-182). New York, N.Y.: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassar, M. & Treiman, R. (1997). The beginnings of orthographic knowledge: Children's knowledge of double letters in words, Journal of Educational Psychology 89: 631-644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, A. & Coltheart, M. (1993). Varieties of developmental dyslexia, Cognition 47: 149-180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chateau, D. & Jared, D. (2000). Exposure to print and word recognition processes, Memory & Cognition 28: 143-153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cipielewski, J. & Stanovich, K.E. (1992). Predicting growth in reading ability from children's exposure to print, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 54: 74-89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, V. & Leahy, J. (1992). Children's and adult's reading of nonwords: Effects of regularity and consistency, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 18: 718-729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A.E. & Stanovich, K.E. (1990). Assessing print exposure and orthographic processing skill in children: A quick measure of reading experience, Journal of Educational Psychology 82: 733-740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A.E. & Stanovich, K.E. (1991). Tracking the unique effects of print exposure in children: Associations with vocabulary, general knowledge, and spelling, Journal of Educational Psychology 83: 264-274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A.E. & Stanovich, K.E. (1993). Children's literacy environments and early word recognition skills, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 5: 193-204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, A.E. & Stanovich, K.E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability ten years later, Developmental Psychology 33: 934-945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L.M. & Markwardt, F.C. (1970). Peabody Individual Achievement Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L.C. (1984). How orthography alters spoken language competencies in children learning to read and spell. In: J. Downing & R. Valtin (eds.), Language awareness and learning to read (pp. 119-147). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L.C. (1995). Phases of development in learning to read words by sight, Journal of Research in Reading 18: 116-125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehri, L.C. (1997). Sight word learning in normal readers and dyslexia. In: B. Blachman (eds.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 163-189). Mahweh, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freebody, P. & Byrne, B. (1988). Word-reading strategies in elementary school children: Relations to comprehension, reading time, and phonemic awareness, Reading Research Quarterly 23: 441-453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails, Psychological Bulletin 123: 71-99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathercole, S.E. & Baddeley, A.D. (1993). Working memory and language. Hove, England: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P.B., Ehri, L. & Treiman, R. (eds.) (1992). Reading acquisition. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoien, T., Lundberg, I., Stanovich, K.E. & Bjaalid, I. (1995). Components of phonological awareness, Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 7: 171-188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juel, C., Griffith, P.L. & Gough, P.B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade, Journal of Educational Psychology 78: 243-255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, I.Y. & Liberman, A.M. (1990). Whole language versus code emphasis: Underlying assumptions and their implications for reading instruction, Annals of Dyslexia 40: 51-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manis, F.R., Seidenberg, M.S., Doi, L.M., McBride-Chang, C. & Peterson, A. (1996). On the bases of two subtypes of developmental dyslexia, Cognition 58: 157-195.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride-Chang, C. (1995). What is phonological awareness? Journal of Educational Psychology 87: 179-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride-Chang, C., Wagner, R.K. & Chang, L. (1997). Growth modeling of phonological awareness, Journal of Educational Psychology 89: 621-630.

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride-Chang, C., Manis, F., Seidenberg, M.S., Custodio, R. & Doi, L. (1993). Print exposure as a predictor of word reading and reading comprehension in disabled and nondisabled readers, Journal of Educational Psychology 85: 230-238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R.K., Forsberg, H., Wise, B. & Rack, J. (1994). Measurement of word recognition, orthographic, and phonological skills. In: G.R. Lyon (eds.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities (pp. 243-277). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, R., Wise, B., Conners, F., Rack, J. & Fulker, D. (1989). Specific deficits in component reading and language skills: Genetic and environmental influences, Journal of Learning Disabilities 22: 339-348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C.A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C.A. (1995). Cognitive research can inform reading education, Journal of Research in Reading 18: 106-115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Share, D.L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition, Cognition 55: 151-218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Share, D.L. & Stanovich, K.E. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: Accommodating individual differences into a model of acquisition, Issues in Education: Contributions from Educational Psychology 1: 1-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, L.S. & Ryan, E.B. (1988). Development of grammatical-sensitivity, phonological, and short-term memory skills in normally achieving and learning disabled children, Developmental Psychology 24: 28-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, L.S., Share, D. & Geva, E. (1995). Evidence for superior orthographic skills in dyslexics, Psychological Science 6: 250-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M.J. (1995). Phonological processing and developmental dyslexia, Journal of Research in Reading 18: 132-138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snowling, M.J. (1996). Contemporary approaches to the teaching of reading, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 37: 139-148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahl, S.A. & Murray, B. (1994). Defining phonological awareness and its relationship to early reading, Journal of Educational Psychology 86: 221-234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy, Reading Research Quarterly 21: 360-407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K.E. (1988). Explaining the differences between the dyslexic and the gardenvariety poor reader: The phonological-core variable-difference model, Journal of Learning Disabilities 21: 590-612.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K.E., Cunningham, A.E. & Cramer, B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 38: 175-190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K.E. & Siegel, L.S. (1994). The phenotypic performance profile of readingdisabled children: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model, Journal of Educational Psychology 86: 24-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K.E., Siegel, L.S. & Gottardo, A. (1997). Converging evidence for phonological and surface subtypes of reading disability, Journal of Educational Psychology 89: 114-127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K.E. & West, R.F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing, Reading Research Quarterly 24: 402-433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. (1984). Individual differences among children in reading and spelling styles, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 37: 463-477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. (1993). Beginning to spell: A study of first grade children. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunmer, W.E. & Nesdale, A.R. (1985). Phonemic segmentation skill and beginning reading, Journal of Educational Psychology 77: 417-427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M. & Tanzman, M. (1994). Components of reading ability. In: G.R. Lyon (eds.), Frames of reference for the assessment of learning disabilities (pp. 279-329). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., Laughon, P., Simmons, K. & Rashotte, C.A. (1993). Development of young readers' phonological processing abilities, Journal of Educational Psychology 85: 83-103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K. & Rashotte, C.A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study, Developmental Psychology 30: 73-87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., Rashotte, C.A., Hecht, S.A., Barker, T.A., Burgess, S.R., Donahue, J. & Garon, T. (1997). Changing causal relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers: A 5-year longitudinal study, Developmental Psychology 33: 468-479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yopp, H.K. (1988). The validity and reliability of phonemic awareness tests, Reading Research Quarterly 23: 159-177.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Cognition & Development Division, University of California, 4511 Tolman Hall, Berkeley, CA, 94720-1670, USA

    Anne E. Cunningham

  2. University of California, Berkeley, USA

    Kathryn E. Perry

  3. University of Toronto, Canada

    Keith E. Stanovich

Authors
  1. Anne E. Cunningham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kathryn E. Perry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Keith E. Stanovich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne E. Cunningham.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cunningham, A.E., Perry, K.E. & Stanovich, K.E. Converging evidence for the concept of orthographic processing. Reading and Writing 14, 549–568 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011100226798

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011100226798

Search

Navigation