Skip to main content
Log in

Gender and productivity differentials in science

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper presents the results of an examination of gender differences in scientific productivity on a sample of 840 respondents, half the young scientific population in Croatia. In the last decade gender differences in the scientific productivity of young researchers have increased, which may be the result of introducing a more competitive scientific system. Young female researchers publish an average of two scientific papers less than their male counterparts in five years, and their publications reach 70.6% of males" publication productivity in the same period. In the case of both sexes, about 15% researchers publish about half of all research papers, but even the most productive women publish less than their male counterparts Socio-demographic, educational and qualificational predictors contribute more or less equally to the number of scientific publications by women and men. It is not until we introduce structural variables that a strong sex differentiation appears because these factors are much more powerful in explaining the production of women. They show that female scientists" publication productivity is more strongly influenced by their position in the social organization of science. There are also considerable sex differences in the case of individual productivity predictors. International contacts determine the number of papers by female scientists most of all. Attendance at scientific conferences abroad is the most powerful predictor of male productivity, too, but reviewing colleagues" papers and academic degree are also very important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. R. Cole, H. Zuckerman, The productivity puzzle: persistence and change in patterns of publication of men and women scientists. In: P. Maehr, M. W. Steinkamp (Eds), Advances in Motivation and Achievement, Volume 2, JAI Press, Greenwich, 1984, pp. 217–258.

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. Cole, Making Science: Between Nature and Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge — London, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. R. Cole, Women in science. In: D. N. Jackson and J. P. Rushton (Eds), Scientific Excellence: Origins and Assessment, Sage, Newbury Park — Beverly Hills — London — New Delhi, 1987, pp. 359–375.

    Google Scholar 

  4. R. Bruner, Women in engineering, Electronic News, 44 (1998) 23–24.

    Google Scholar 

  5. L. G. Humphreys, Women with doctorates in science and engineering. In: P. Maehr, M. W. Steinkamp (Eds), Advances in Motivation and Achievement, Volume 2, JAI Press, Greenwich,1984, pp. 197–216.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Holden, Women inch toward parity in science, Science, 283 (1999) 323.

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Preston, Why have all the women gone? A study of exit of women from science and engineering professions, American Economic Review, 84 (1994) 1446–1459.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Women in science — Women and science, Women's International Network News, 24 (1998) 56.

  9. K. PrpiĆ Žena u znanosti (Woman in science), Žena (Woman), 40 (1982) 53–67.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Unesco Statistical Yearbook, 1999, (Chapter III. Science and technology), Unesco — Bernan Press, Paris — Lanham, Md., 1999, pp. III/23–III/26.

  11. Science and Engineering Indicators 1998. (Chapter 3, Science and Engineering Workforce), National Science Foundation (NSF), pp. 3/14–3/15: http://www.nsf.gov/sbe/srs/seind98/pdfstart.htm

  12. H. Radtke, Women in science careers in the German Democratic Republic. In: V. Stolte–Heiskanen et al. (Eds), Women in Science: Token Women or Gender Equality, Berg Publishers, Oxford — New York, 1991, pp. 63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. BlagojeviĆ, Double–faced marginalisation. Women in science in Yugoslavia. In: V. Stolte–Heiskanen et al. (Eds), Women in Science: Token Women or Gender Equality, Berg Publishers, Oxford — New York, 1991, pp. 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  14. N. Ananieva, Women in science in Bulgaria: The long hurdle–race. In: V. Stolte–Heiskanen et al. (Eds), Women in Science: Token Women or Gender Equality, Berg Publishers, Oxford — New York, 1991, pp. 95–117.

    Google Scholar 

  15. V. Koval, Soviet women in science. In: V. Stolte–Heiskanen et al. (Eds), Women in Science: Token Women or Gender Equality, Berg Publishers, Oxford — New York, 1991, pp. 119–133.

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Haraszthy, Equal opportunities for women? Women in science in Hungary. In: V. Stolte–Heiskanen et al. (Eds), Women in Science: Token Women or Gender Equality, Berg Publishers, Oxford — New York, 1991, pp. 193–198.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. R. Cole, S. Cole, Social Stratification in Science, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago & London, 1981 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  18. H. Zuckerman, J. R. Cole, Women in American science, Minerva, 13 (1975) 82–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. Bayer, H. Astin, Sex differentials in the academic reward system, Science, 188 (1975) 796–802.

    Google Scholar 

  20. T. Blackstone, O. Fulton, Sex discrimination among university teachers: A British — American comparison, The British Journal of Sociology, 26 (1975) 261–275.

    Google Scholar 

  21. T. Luukkonen–Gronow, V. Stolte–Heiskanen, Myths and realities of role incompatibility of women scientists, Acta Sociologica, 26 (1983) 267–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. H. S. Astin, Academic scholarship and its rewards. In: P. Maehr, M. W. Steinkamp (Eds), Advances in Motivation and Achievement, Volume 2, JAI Press, Greenwich,1984, pp. 259–279.

    Google Scholar 

  23. K. PrpiĆ, Marginalne grupe u znanosti (Marginal Groups in Science), RZ RK SSOH — IDIS, Zagreb, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  24. V. Stolte–Heiskanen, Handmaidens of the ‘knowledge class’. Women in science in Finland. In: V. Stolte–Heiskanen et al. (Eds), Women in Science:Token Women or Gender Equality, Berg Publishers, Oxford — New York, 1991, pp. 35–62.

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. S. Long, P. D. Allison, R. Mcginnis, Rank achievement in academic careers: Sex differences and the effects of productivity, American Sociological Review, 58 (1993) 703–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. B. F. Reskin, Sex differences in status attainment in science: the case of postdoctoral fellowship, American Sociological Review, 41 (1976) 597–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. F. Acar, Women in academic science careers in Turkey. In: V. Stolte–Heiskanen et al. (Eds), Women in Science: Token Women or Gender Equality, Berg Publishers, Oxford — New York, 1991, pp. 147–171.

    Google Scholar 

  28. S. Harding, E. Mcgregor, The gender dimension of science and technology, Women's International Network News, 22 (1996) 14–16.

    Google Scholar 

  29. F. Clemente, Early career determinants of research productivity, American Journal of Sociology, 79 (1973) 409–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. B. F. Reskin, Scientific productivity, sex, and location in the institution of science, American Journal of Sociology, 83 (1978) 1235–1243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. J. S. Long, The origin of sex differences in science, Social Forces, 68 (1990) 1297–1315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. J. S. Long, Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity, Social Forces, 71 (1992) 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Y. Xie, K. A. Shauman, Sex differences in research productivity: new evidence about an old puzzle, American Sociological Review, 63 (1998) 847–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. S. Kyvik, Motherhood and scientific productivity, Social Studies of Science, 20 (1990) 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  35. T. Thagaard, Research environment, motivation and publication productivity, Science Studies, 4 (1991) 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  36. K. PrpiĆ, Znanstvena produktivnost istra živa ča izmeđ u minimalizma i maksimalizma (Scientific productivity of researchers between minimalism and maximalism). In: K. PrpiĆ, B. Golub (Eds), Znanstvena produktivnost i potencijalni egzodus istraživa č a Hrvatske (Scientific Productivity and Potential Exodus of Croatian Researchers), Institut za društvena istraživanja Sveučilišta u Zagrebu, Zagreb, 1990, pp. 1–61; 107–127 (Appendix).

    Google Scholar 

  37. W. Lemoine, Productivity patterns of men and women scientists in Venezuela, Scientometrics, 24 (1992) 281–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. W. Lemoine, The frequency distribution of research papers and patents according sex. The case of CSIR, India, Scientometrics, 24 (1992) 449–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. B. M. Gupta, S. Kumar, B. S. Aggarwal, A comparison of productivity of male and female scientists of CSIR, Scientometrics, 45 (1999) 269–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. S. Kyvik, M. Teigen, Child care, research collaboration, and gender differences in scientific productivity, Science, Technology & Human Values, 21 (1996) 54–71.

    Google Scholar 

  41. I. Hanson Frieze, B. Hartman Hanusa, Women scientists: overcoming barriers. In: P. Maehr, M. W. Steinkamp (Eds), Advances in Motivation and Achievement, Volume 2, JAI Press, Greenwich, 1984, pp. 139–163.

    Google Scholar 

  42. J. Nielsen, B. Elkjaer, Stubborness, drudgery, scientific interest and profound commitment. In: P. Maehr, M. W. Steinkamp (Eds), Advances in Motivation and Achievement, Volume 2, JAI Press, Greenwich, 1984, pp. 199–213.

    Google Scholar 

  43. P. D. Allison, J. A. Stewart, Productivity differences among scientists: Evidence for accumulative advantage, American Sociological Review, 39 (1974) 596–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. P. D. Allison, Inequality and scientific productivity, Social Studies of Science, 10 (1980) 163–179.

    Google Scholar 

  45. K. PrpiĆ, The publication productivity of young scientists: An empirical study, Scientometrics, 49 (2000) 453–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. V. Stolte–Heiskanen, N. Visart, C. Gainche, Comparison of patterns of research effectiveness and output and their stability across six countries. In: J. Farkas (Eds), Sociology of Science and Research, Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, 1979, pp. 289–329.

    Google Scholar 

  47. E. Mirskaya, Russian academic science today: Its societal standing and the situation within the scientific community, Social Studies of Science, 25 (1995) 705–725.

    Google Scholar 

  48. S. Kyvik, Productivity differences, fields of learning, and Lotka's law, Scientometrics, 15 (1989) 205–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. O. H. ThorsteinsdÓttir, External research collaboration in two small science systems, Scientometrics, 49 (2000) 145–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. K. Durkin, Social cognition and social context in the construction of sex differences. In: M. A. Baker (Ed.), Sex Differences in Human Performance, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester — New York — Brisbane — Toronto — Singapore, 1987: pp. 141–170.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Prpić, K. Gender and productivity differentials in science. Scientometrics 55, 27–58 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016046819457

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016046819457

Keywords

Navigation