Abstract
Reproductive isolation between demes of a phytophagous arthropod population that use different host plant species could evolve in two different ways. First, adaptation to different host species might result in reproductive isolation as a pleiotropic by-product. Second, if adaptation to one host species strongly reduces fitness on others, selection could favour mechanisms, such as host fidelity and assortative mating, that restrict gene flow between host-adapted demes. A laboratory selection experiment on the broadly polyphagous spider mite Tetranychus urticae gave information on these possibilities. A population allowed to adapt to tomato plants showed increased survival, development rate and fecundity on tomato relative to the base population from which it was derived. In spite of the large difference between the tomato-adapted and base populations in performance on tomato plants, the two populations showed no evidence of reproductive isolation, as measured by the hatching rate of eggs laid by F1 hybrids between the lines. Furthermore, a genetically variable population formed by hybridizing the tomato-adapted and base populations did not show evidence for a decline in ability to survive on tomato after more than ten generations of mass rearing on lima bean, indicating that tomato-adapted genotypes suffered little or no selective disadvantage on bean. These results give no support for the role of host plants in the evolution of reproductive isolation in T. urticae.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
De Boer, R. 1979. Investigations concerning the development of reproductive incompatibilities between populations of the spider mite, Tetranychus urticae. Zeitschrift Angew. Entomol. 87: 113–121.
De Boer, R. 1980. Genetic affinities between spider mite Tetranychus urticae (Acarina: Tetranychidae) populations in a non-agricultural area. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 28: 22–28.
De Boer, R. 1985. Reproductive barriers. In Spider mites: their biology, natural enemies and control, Vol. 1A, W. Helle and M.W. Sabelis (eds), pp. 193–199. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
Diehl, S.R. and Bush, G.L. 1989. The role of habitat preference in adaptation and speciation. In Speciation and its consequences, D. Otte and J. Endler (eds), pp. 345–365. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
Fry, J.D. 1988. Genetic variation and genetic correlations in host-specific fitness in the phytophagous mite Tetranychus urticae Koch. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Fry, J.D. 1989. Evolutionary adaptation to host plants in a laboratory population of the phytophagous mite Tetranychus urticae Koch. Oecologia 81: 559–565.
Fry, J.D. 1990. Trade-offs in fitness on different hosts: evidence from a selection experiment with a phytophagous mite. Am. Nat. 136: 569–580.
Fry, J.D. 1996. The evolution of host specialization: are ‘trade-offs’ overrated? Am. Nat. 148: S84–S107.
Fry, J.D., Heinsohn, S.L. and Mackay, T.F.C. 1996. The contribution of new mutations to genotype-environment interaction for fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 50: 2316–2327.
Gould, F. 1979. Rapid host range evolution in a population of the phytophagous mite Tetranychus urticae Koch. Evolution 33: 791–802.
Jeppson, L.R., Keifer, H.H. and Baker, E.W. 1975. Mites Injurious to Economic Plants. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.
Kawecki, T.J. 1994. Accumulation of deleterious mutations and the evolutionary cost of being a generalist. Am. Nat. 144: 833–838.
Kawecki, T.J. 1996. Sympatric speciation driven by beneficial mutations. Proc. R. Soc. London B 263: 1515–1520.
Larsen, R.J. and Marx, M.L. 1981. An Introduction to Mathematical Statistics and its Applications. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Maynard Smith, J. 1966. Sympatric speciation. Am. Nat. 100: 637–650.
Overmeer, W.P.J. 1966. Intersterility as a consequence of insecticide selections in Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). Nature 209: 321.
Overmeer, W.P.J. and van Zon, A.Q. 1976. Partial reproductive incompatibility between populations of spider mites (Acarina: Tetranychidae). Entomol. Exp. Appl. 20: 225–236.
Rice, W.R. and Hostert, E.E. 1993. Laboratory experiments on speciation: what have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 47: 1637–1653.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fry, J.D. The Role of Adaptation to Host Plants in the Evolution of Reproductive Isolation: Negative Evidence from Tetranychus Urticae Koch. Exp Appl Acarol 23, 379–387 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006245711950
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006245711950