Skip to main content
Log in

The Role of Adaptation to Host Plants in the Evolution of Reproductive Isolation: Negative Evidence from Tetranychus Urticae Koch

  • Published:
Experimental & Applied Acarology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Reproductive isolation between demes of a phytophagous arthropod population that use different host plant species could evolve in two different ways. First, adaptation to different host species might result in reproductive isolation as a pleiotropic by-product. Second, if adaptation to one host species strongly reduces fitness on others, selection could favour mechanisms, such as host fidelity and assortative mating, that restrict gene flow between host-adapted demes. A laboratory selection experiment on the broadly polyphagous spider mite Tetranychus urticae gave information on these possibilities. A population allowed to adapt to tomato plants showed increased survival, development rate and fecundity on tomato relative to the base population from which it was derived. In spite of the large difference between the tomato-adapted and base populations in performance on tomato plants, the two populations showed no evidence of reproductive isolation, as measured by the hatching rate of eggs laid by F1 hybrids between the lines. Furthermore, a genetically variable population formed by hybridizing the tomato-adapted and base populations did not show evidence for a decline in ability to survive on tomato after more than ten generations of mass rearing on lima bean, indicating that tomato-adapted genotypes suffered little or no selective disadvantage on bean. These results give no support for the role of host plants in the evolution of reproductive isolation in T. urticae.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • De Boer, R. 1979. Investigations concerning the development of reproductive incompatibilities between populations of the spider mite, Tetranychus urticae. Zeitschrift Angew. Entomol. 87: 113–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, R. 1980. Genetic affinities between spider mite Tetranychus urticae (Acarina: Tetranychidae) populations in a non-agricultural area. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 28: 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, R. 1985. Reproductive barriers. In Spider mites: their biology, natural enemies and control, Vol. 1A, W. Helle and M.W. Sabelis (eds), pp. 193–199. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, S.R. and Bush, G.L. 1989. The role of habitat preference in adaptation and speciation. In Speciation and its consequences, D. Otte and J. Endler (eds), pp. 345–365. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, J.D. 1988. Genetic variation and genetic correlations in host-specific fitness in the phytophagous mite Tetranychus urticae Koch. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, J.D. 1989. Evolutionary adaptation to host plants in a laboratory population of the phytophagous mite Tetranychus urticae Koch. Oecologia 81: 559–565.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, J.D. 1990. Trade-offs in fitness on different hosts: evidence from a selection experiment with a phytophagous mite. Am. Nat. 136: 569–580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, J.D. 1996. The evolution of host specialization: are ‘trade-offs’ overrated? Am. Nat. 148: S84–S107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, J.D., Heinsohn, S.L. and Mackay, T.F.C. 1996. The contribution of new mutations to genotype-environment interaction for fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 50: 2316–2327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, F. 1979. Rapid host range evolution in a population of the phytophagous mite Tetranychus urticae Koch. Evolution 33: 791–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeppson, L.R., Keifer, H.H. and Baker, E.W. 1975. Mites Injurious to Economic Plants. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawecki, T.J. 1994. Accumulation of deleterious mutations and the evolutionary cost of being a generalist. Am. Nat. 144: 833–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawecki, T.J. 1996. Sympatric speciation driven by beneficial mutations. Proc. R. Soc. London B 263: 1515–1520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, R.J. and Marx, M.L. 1981. An Introduction to Mathematical Statistics and its Applications. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. 1966. Sympatric speciation. Am. Nat. 100: 637–650.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overmeer, W.P.J. 1966. Intersterility as a consequence of insecticide selections in Tetranychus urticae Koch (Acari: Tetranychidae). Nature 209: 321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overmeer, W.P.J. and van Zon, A.Q. 1976. Partial reproductive incompatibility between populations of spider mites (Acarina: Tetranychidae). Entomol. Exp. Appl. 20: 225–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, W.R. and Hostert, E.E. 1993. Laboratory experiments on speciation: what have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 47: 1637–1653.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James D. Fry.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fry, J.D. The Role of Adaptation to Host Plants in the Evolution of Reproductive Isolation: Negative Evidence from Tetranychus Urticae Koch. Exp Appl Acarol 23, 379–387 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006245711950

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006245711950

Navigation