Skip to main content
Log in

When Is Dominance Related to Smiling? Assigned Dominance, Dominance Preference, Trait Dominance, and Gender as Moderators

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated gender and different types of dominance measures as potential moderators of the relation between dominance and smiling. We asked participants about their preference for either a dominant or a subordinate role (dominance preference), randomly assigned one of these roles to them (assigned dominance), and assessed trait dominance, felt dominance, and perceived dominance. Participants had two 8-min dyadic interactions in same-gender groups (33 all-women dyads, 36 all-men dyads), in which one was assigned to be the owner of an art gallery and the other was assigned to be the assistant to the owner. Interactions were videotaped, and smiling and perceived dominance were assessed on the basis of the videotapes. Both the particular dominance measure and gender moderated the relation between dominance and smiling. Results showed that for women in subordinate positions, those who wanted to be in a subordinate position smiled more than those who wanted to be in a dominant position. No such effect occurred for men and for participants in assigned dominant positions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

references

  • Burgoon, J. K., & Le Poire, B. A. (1999). Nonverbal cues and interpersonal judgments: Participant and observer perceptions of intimacy, dominance, composure, and formality. Communication Monographs, 66, 105-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cashdan, E. (1998). Smiles, speech, and body posture: How women and men display sociometric status and power. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 22, 209-228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, F. M. (1990). Status, sex, and smiling: The effect of smiling in men and women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 16, 531-540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, F. M., LeBaron, D., & Fryer, M. M. (1987). What is in a smile? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 341-352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dovidio, J. F., Brown, C. E., Heltman, K., Ellyson, S. L., & Keating, C. F. (1988). Power displays between women and men in discussions of gender-linked tasks: A multichannel study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 580-587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, S. D., & Fiske, D. W. (1977). Face to face interaction: Research methods and theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Karau, S. J., Miner, J. B., & Johnson, B. T. (1994). Gender and motivation to manage in hierarchic organizations: A meta-analysis. Leadership Quarterly, 5, 135-159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellyson, S. L., & Dovidio, J. F. (1985). Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior: Basic concepts and issues. In S. L. Ellyson & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior (pp. 1-27). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallon, J., & Guo, D. (1994). The relationship between topic familiarity and conversational dominance. Journal of Human Behavior, 31, 53-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, R. S. (1995). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frances, S. J. (1979). Sex differences in nonverbal behavior. Sex Roles, 5, 519-535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, H. S., & Miller-Herringer, T. (1991). Nonverbal display of emotion in public and in private: Self-monitoring, personality, and expressive cues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 766-775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, R. (1991). Mapping nonverbal behavior on the interpersonal circle. Journal of_Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 279-288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, R. (1994). A lens-mapping framework for understanding the encoding and decoding of interpersonal dispositions in nonverbal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 398-412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, D. K., Jones, E. E., & Lord, C. G. (1986). Self-promotion is not ingratiating. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 106-115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H. G. (1975). Manual for the California Psychological Inventory. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halberstadt, A. G., & Saitta, M. B. (1987). Gender, nonverbal behavior, and perceived dominance: A test of the theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 257-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A. (1984). Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A. (1998). How big are nonverbal sex differences? The case of smiling and sensitivity to nonverbal cues. In D. J. Canary & K. Dindia (Eds.), Sex differences and similarities in communication: Critical essays and empirical investigations of sex and gender in interaction (pp. 155-177). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A., & Friedman, G. B. (1999). Status, gender, and nonverbal behavior: A study of structured interactions between employees of a company. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1082-1091.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A., Horgan, T., & Carter, J. (2002). Assigned status in relation to observer-coded and participant-reported smiling. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 26, 63-81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. A., LeBeau, L. S., Reinoso, J. G., & Thayer, F. (2001). Status, gender, and nonverbal behavior in candid and posed photographs: A study of conversations between university employees. Sex Roles, 44, 677-692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, M. A., & LaFrance, M. (1998). License or obligation to smile: The effect of power and sex on amount and type of smiling. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1332-1342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henley, N. M. (1977). Body politics: Power, sex, and nonverbal communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henley, N. M., & LaFrance, M. (1984). Gender as culture: Difference and dominance in nonverbal behavior. In A. Wolfgang (Ed.), Nonverbal behavior: Perspectives, applications, intercultural insights (pp. 351-371). Lewiston, NY: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (1994). Gender, legitimate authority, and leader-subordinate conversations. American Sociological Review, 59, 122-135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, C. F., Mazur, A., Segall, M. H., Cysneiros, P. G., Divale, W. T., Kilbride, J. E., et al. (1981). Culture and the perception of social dominance from facial expression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 615-626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiesler, D. J. (1984). Check List of Psychotherapy Transactions (CLOPT) and Check List of Interpersonal Transactions (CLOIT). Richmond: Virginia Commonwealth University.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFrance, M., & Hecht, M. A. (2000). Gender and smiling: A meta-analysis. In A. H. Fischer (Ed.), Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives (pp. 118-142). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, L. M. (1973). An experimental approach to the use of ingratiation tactics under homogeneous and heterogeneous dyads. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 427-445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippa, R. A. (1994). Introduction to social psychology. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Megargee, E. I. (1969). Influence of sex roles on the manifestation of leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 377-382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehrabian, A., & Williams, M. (1969). Nonverbal concomitants of perceived and intended persuasiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 37-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz, D. S. (1988). Cross-situational generality in the laboratory: Dominance and friendliness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 829-839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyquist, L. V., & Spence, J. T. (1986). Effects of dispositional dominance and sex role expectations on leadership behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 87-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghunathan, T. E., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1996). Comparing correlated but nonoverlapping correlations. Psychological Methods, 1, 178-183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991).Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis (2nd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid Mast, M. S., & Bischof, N. (1999). Eine experimentelle Untersuchung zum Altruismus in Rangbeziehungen [An experimental study on altruism in rank relationships]. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 207, 1-34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, W. C. (1958). FIRO-B: A three dimensional theory on interpersonal behavior. New York: Rhinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J. S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395-412.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marianne Schmid Mast.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mast, M.S., Hall, J.A. When Is Dominance Related to Smiling? Assigned Dominance, Dominance Preference, Trait Dominance, and Gender as Moderators. Sex Roles 50, 387–399 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000018893.08121.ef

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000018893.08121.ef

Navigation