Skip to main content
Log in

Health related quality of life: A changing construct?

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 186 patients with early colon cancer, we investigated the assumption that the meaning of ‘quality of life’(QL) remains constant over time. Within a phase-III trial (SAKK 40/93), patients estimated both their overall QL and a range of disease- and treatment-related domains at five timepoints, comprising three concurrent and 2 retrospective estimates: their pre-surgery QL both before surgery and retrospectively thereafter, and their pre-adjuvant QL both at the beginning of adjuvant treatment and retrospectively about 2 months later, and their current QL 2 weeks thereafter. Multilevel models were developed to determine whether the selected domains made stable contributions to overall QL at the concurrent estimates. The weights of the domains changed over time. They did not differ significantly according to whether patients were considering their concurrent state or reflecting on this state at a later timepoint. In the process of adaptation, patients with early colon cancer substantially change the relative importance of QL domains to overall QL. This finding argues for QL as a changing construct and against the assumption that domain-specific weights are stable across distinct clinical phases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McGee HM, O'Boyle CA, Hickey A, O'Malley K, Joyce CRB. Assessing the quality of life of the individual: The SEIQoL with a healthy and a gastroenterology unit population. Psychol Med 1991; 21: 749–759.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hickey AM, Bury G, O'Boyle CA, Bradley F, O'Kelly FD, Shannon W. A new short form individual quality of life measure (SEIQoL-DW): Application in a cohort of individuals with HIV/AIDS. Brit Med J 1996; 313: 29–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferrans CE, Powers MJ. Quality of life index: Development and psychometric properties. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 1985; 8: 15–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tugwell P, Bombardier C, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Grace E, Hanna B. The MACTAR Patient Preference Disability Questionnaire-an individualized functional priority approach for assessing improvement in physical disability in clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1987; 14: 446–451.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, et al. The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 570–579.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Becker M, Diamond R, Sainfort F. A new patient focused index for measuring quality of life in persons with severe and persistent mental illness. Qual Life Res 1993; 2: 239–251.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Henrich G, Herschbach P. Questions on Life Satisfaction (FLZM)-A short questionnaire for assessing subjective quality of life. Eur J Psychol Assessment 2000; 16: 150–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wright JG, Young NL. The patient-specific index: Asking patients what they want. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997; 79: 974–983.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mozes B, Shabtai E. The contribution of personal rating to the clinimetric functioning of a generic quality of life instrument. J Clin Epidemiol 1996; 49: 1419–1422.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Larsson G, Sjoden PO, Oberg K, von Essen L. Importancesatisfaction discrepancies are associated with health-related quality of life in five-year survivors of endocrine gastrointestinal tumours. Ann Oncol 1999; 10: 1321–1327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tishelman C, Degner LF, Mueller B. Measuring symptom distress in patients with lung cancer. A pilot study of experienced intensity and importance of symptoms. Cancer Nurs 2000; 23: 82–90.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Trauer T, Mackinnon A. Why are we weighting? Qual Life Res 2001; 10: 579–585.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Osman LM, McKenzie L, Cairns J, et al. Patient weighting of importance of asthma symptoms. Thorax 2001; 56: 138–142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Neudert C, Wasner M, Borasio GD. Patients' assessment of quality of life instruments: A randomised study of SIP, SF-36 and SEIQoL-DW in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 2001; 191: 103–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sprangers MA, Schwartz CE. The challenge of response shift for quality-of-life-based clinical oncology research (editorial). Ann Oncol 1999; 10: 747–749.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sprangers MAG, Schwartz CE. Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: A theoretical model. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48: 1507–1515.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bernhard J, Hurny C, Maibach R, Herrmann R, Laffer U.Quality of life as subjective experience: Reframing of perception in patients with colon cancer undergoing radical resection with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK). Ann Oncol 1999; 10: 775–782.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bernhard J, Lowy A, Maibach R, Huerny C. Response shift in the perception of health for utility evaluation. An explorative investigation. Eur J Cancer 2001; 37: 1729–1735.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bernhard J, Sullivan M, Huerny C, Coates AS, Rudenstam CM. Clinical relevance of single item quality of life indicators in cancer clinical trials. Br J Cancer 2001; 84: 1156–1165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bernhard J, Maibach R, Thuerlimann B, Sessa C, Aapro MS. Patients' estimation of overall treatment burden: Why not ask the obvious? J Clin Oncol 2002; 20: 65–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Coates A, Fisher Dillenbeck CF, MCNeil DR, et al. On the receiving end II. Linear analogue self-assessment (LASA) in evaluation of aspects of the quality of life of cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1983; 19: 1633–1637.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Coates A, Gebski V, Bishop JF, et al. Improving the quality of life during chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. A comparison of intermittent and continuous treatment strategies. N Engl J Med 1987; 317: 1490–1495.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Butow P, Coates A, Dunn S, Bernhard J, Hürny C. On the receiving end IV: Validation of quality of life indicators. Ann Oncol 1991; 2: 597–603.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hürny C, Bernhard J, Bacchi M, et al. The Perceived Adjustment to Chronic Illness Scale (PACIS): A global indicator of coping for operable breast cancer patients in clinical trials. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) and the International Breast Cancer Study Group (IBCSG). Support Care Cancer 1993; 1: 200–208.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hürny C, Bernhard J, Coates AS, et al. Impact of adjuvant therapy on quality of life in women with node-positive operable breast cancer. International Breast Cancer Study Group. Lancet 1996; 347: 1279–1284.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hürny C, Bernhard J, Coates A, et al. Responsiveness of a single-item indicator versus a multi-item scale: Assessment of emotional well-being in an international adjuvant breast cancer trial. Med Care 1996; 34: 234–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sloan JA, Loprinzi CL, Kuross SA, et al. Randomized comparison of four tools measuring overall quality of life in patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 3662–3673.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bernhard J, Thurlimann B, Schmitz SF, et al. Defining clinical benefit in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer under second-line endocrine treatment: Does quality of life matter? J Clin Oncol 1999; 17: 1672–1679.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bernhard J, Hürny C. Gastrointestinal cancer. In: Holland J (ed.),Psycho-oncology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998; 324–339.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Howard GS, Ralph KM, Gulanick NA, Maxwell SE, Nance SW, Gerber SK. Internal invalidity in pretest-posttest self-report evaluations and a re-evaluation of retrospective pretests. Appl Psychol Meas 1979; 3: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rasbash J, Browne W, Goldstein H. A user's guide to MLWIN. London: Centre for Multilevel Modelling, Institute of Education, University of London, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Goldstein H. Multilevel statistical models. London: Edward Arnold, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lowy A, Bernhard J. Quantitative assessment of changes in patients' constructs of quality of life: an application of multilevel models. Qual Life Res 2004; 13: 1177–1185.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Rothman K. The assessment and control of confounding. Modern epidemiology. Boston: Little, Brown and Co, 1986; 125–126.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wan GJ, Counte MA, Cella DF. The influence of personal expectations on cancer patients' reports of health-related quality of life. Psychooncology 1997; 6: 1–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bromberg MB, Forshew DA. Comparison of instruments addressing quality of life in patients with ALS and their caregivers. Neurology 2002; 58: 320–322.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Little R, Rubin D. Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  38. de Haes JC, de Ruiter JH, Tempelaar R, Pennink BJ. The distinction between affect and cognition in the quality of life of cancer patients-sensitivity and stability. Qual Life Res 1992; 1: 315–322.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jansen SJ, Stiggelbout AM, Nooij MA, Kievit J. The effect of individually assessed preference weights on the relationship between holistic utilities and nonpreference-based assessment. Qual Life Res 2000; 9: 541–557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bult JR, Hunink MG, Tsevat J, Weinstein MC. Heterogeneity in the relationship between the time tradeoff and Short Form-36 for HIV-infected and primary care patients. Med Care 1998; 36: 523–532.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993; 85: 365–376.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Pehrsson K, Olofson J, Larsson S, Sullivan M. Quality of life of patients treated by home mechanical ventilation due to restrictive ventilatory disorders. Respir Med 1994; 88: 21–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bernhard, J., Lowy, A., Mathys, N. et al. Health related quality of life: A changing construct?. Qual Life Res 13, 1187–1197 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000037485.59681.7d

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000037485.59681.7d

Navigation