Skip to main content
Log in

Are artificial wetlands good alternatives to natural wetlands for waterbirds? – A case study on Chongming Island, China

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Loss of natural wetlands is a global phenomenon that has been a serious threat to the wildlife. A common practice is to construct artificial wetlands to compensate for the loss of natural wetlands. To test whether artificial wetlands as habitats for waterbirds are good alternatives to natural wetlands, we compared species richness, abundance, and seasonal dynamics of waterbird communities of natural (here tidelands) and artificial wetlands (here aquacultural ponds) on Chongming Island, China. Our results indicate that habitat preference of waterbirds showed seasonal difference: most of the shorebirds were found on tidelands in spring, whereas most of the natatorial birds were recorded in aquacultural ponds in winter. Waterbirds preferred the tidelands rather than aquacultural ponds in both spring and autumn, whereas they showed no preference for either the tidelands or the ponds in summer and winter. It is concluded that natural wetlands are better habitats for waterbirds than artificial wetlands on Chongming Island, while the artificial ones are also suitable habitats for waterbirds in winter. The waterbirds might use artificial wetlands only when natural wetlands are unavailable or of poor quality. An over-emphasis that artificial wetlands are suitable habitats for waterbirds might encourage land managers to convert natural wetlands into the artificial ones, resulting in considerable loss of bird diversity. Therefore, for the purpose of bird conservation, it would be a better practice to conserve natural wetlands rather than to construct artificial ones after destruction of natural wetlands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acosta M., Mugica L., Mancina C. and Ruiz X. 1996. Resource partitioning between glossy and white ibises in a rice field system in south-central Cuba. Colonial Waterbirds 19: 65–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barter M., Tonkinson D., Tang S.X. and Qian F.W. 1997.Wader number on Chongming Dao, Yangtze Estuary, China, during early 1996: northward migration and the conservation implications. Stilt 30: 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulinier T., Nichols J.D., Sauer J.R., Hines J.E. and Pollock K.H. 1998. Estimating species richness: the importance of heterogeneity in species detectability. Ecology 79: 1018–1028.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham K.P. and Overton W.S. 1978. Estimation of the size of a closed population when capture probabilities vary among animals. Biometrika 65: 625–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham K.P. and Overton W.S. 1979. Robust estimation of population size when capture probabilities vary among animals. Ecology 60: 927–936.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cody M.L. 1985. Habitat Selection in Birds. Academic Press Inc., Orlando, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell M.A. and Taft O.W. 2000.Waterbird communities in managed wetlands of varying water depth. Waterbirds 23: 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day J.H. and Colwell M.A. 1998. Waterbird communities in rice fields subjected to different post-harvest treatments. Colonial waterbirds 21: 185–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan P., Hewison A.J.M., Houte S., Rosoux R., Tournebize T., Dubs F. et al. 1999. Long-term changes in agricultural practices and wildfowling in an internationally important wetland, and their effects on the guild of wintering ducks. Journal of Applied Ecology 36: 11–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elphick C.S. 2000. Functional equivalency between rice fields and semi-natural wetland habitats. Conservation Biology 14: 181–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elphick C.S. and Oring L.W. 1998. Winter management of Californian rice fields for waterbirds. Journal of Applied Ecology 35: 95–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erwin R.M., Dawson D.K., Stotts D.B., Mcallister L.S. and Geissler P.H. 1991. Open marsh water management in the mid-Atlantic region-Aerial surveys of waterbird use. Wetlands 11: 209–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froneman A., Mangnall M.J., Little R.M. and Crowe T.M. 2001. Waterbird assemblages and associated habitat characteristics of farm ponds in theWestern Cape, South Africa. Biodiversity and Conservation 10: 251–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillemain M., Fritz H. and Guillon N. 2000. The use of an artificial wetland by Shoveler Anas clypeata in western France: the role of food resources. Revue D'Ecologie-La Terre Et La Vie 55: 263–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines J.E., Boulinier T., Nichols J.D., Sauer J.R. and Pollock K.H. 1999. COMDYN: software to study the dynamics of animal communities using a capture-recapture approach. Bird Study 46: 209–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Z.Y., Sun Z.H., Yu K., Zhou M.Z., Zhao R.Q. and Gao J. 1993. Bird Resources and Habitats in Shanghai. Fudan University Press, Shanghai, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isola C.R., Colwell M.A., Taft O.W. and Safran R.J. 2000. Interspecific differences in habitat use of shorebirds and waterfowl foraging in managed wetlands of California's San Joaquin Valley. Waterbirds 23: 196–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jing K., Tang S.M., Chen J.K. and Ma Z.J. 2002. Primary research on the characteristics of feeding sites of Grus monacha in the east tide flat of Chongming Island. Chinese Zoological Research 23: 84–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennish M.J. 2001. Coastal salt marsh systems in the US: a review of anthropogenic impacts. Journal of Coastal Research 17: 731–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane S.J. and Fujioka M. 1998. The impact of changes in irrigation practices on the distribution of foraging egrets and herons (Ardeidae) in the rice fields of Central Japan. Biological Conservation 83: 221–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li C.X. and Wang W.L. 1997. Biostatistics. Science Press, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu J.J. 1990. Wetlands in China. East China Normal University Press, Shanghai, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu J.J., Sun X.K. and He W.S. 1998. Study on wetlands in Shanghai area. In: Lang H.Q., Lin P. and Lu J.J. (eds), Conservation and Research of Wetlands in China. East China Normal University Press, Shanghai, China, pp. 297–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma Z.J., Li W.J. and Wang Z.J. 2000. Conservation of Red-crowned Crane. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma Z.J., Wang Z.J. and Tang H.X. 1999. Habitat use and selection by red-crowned crane Grus japonensis in winter in Yancheng Biosphere Reserve, China. Ibis 141: 135–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols J.D., Boulinier T., Hines J.E., Pollock K.H. and Sauer J.R. 1998. Inference methods for spatial variation in species richness and community composition when not all species are detected. Conservation Biology 12: 1390–1398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogden J.C. 1991. Nesting by wood storks in natural, altered, and artificial wetlands in central and northern Florida. Colonial Waterbirds 14: 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose P.M. and Scott D.A. 1997. Waterfowl Population Estimates, 2nd edn. Publication 44. Wetlands International, Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott D.A. 1989. A Directory of Asian Wetlands. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanghai Statistical Bureau 2001. Shanghai Statistical Yearbook-2001. Chinese Statistics Press, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straw P. 1997. Shorebird conservation in the Asia-Pacific region. Australasian Wader Studies Group of Birds Australia, Melbourne, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • StreeverW.J., Portier K.M. and Crisman T.L. 1996. A comparison of dipterans from ten created and ten natural wetlands. Wetlands 16: 416–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tourenq C., Bennetts R.E., Kowalski H., Vialet E., Lucchesi J.L., Kayser Y. et al. 2001. Are ricefields a good alternative to natural marshes for waterbird communities in the Camargue, southern France? Biological Conservation 100: 335–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner R.K., Van den Berg J.C.J.M., Soderqvist T., Barendregt A., Van den Straaten J., Maltby E. et al. 2000. Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: scientific integration for management and policy. Ecological Economics 35: 7–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang T.H. and Qian G.Z. 1988. Shorebirds in the Yangtze Estuary and Hangzhou Bay. East China Normal University Press, Shanghai, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H. and Du J.J. 1993. Primary study on the waterbirds in Sheyang Saltworks. Chinese Journal of Zoology 28: 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • West T.L., Clough L.M. and Ambrose W.C. 2000. Assessment of function in an oligohaline environment: lessons learned by comparing created and natural habitats. Ecological Engineering 15: 303–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang J. 1998. Development of fishery and international trade of fishery products in China. Economic Research on Chinese Fishery 2: 7–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu K. 1991.Waterfowls and their conservation at Dongtans of Chongming Island. Chinese Wildlife 2: 15–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu K., Tang Z.M., Tang S.H. and Jiang X.L. 1991. The food habits and habitats of Cygnus columbianus at Dongtans of Chongming Island. In: Gao W. (ed.), Ornithology Research in China. Science Press, Beijing, China, pp. 32–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zheng G.M. and Wang Q.S. 1998. China Red Data Book of Endangered Animals: Aves. Science Press, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jiakuan Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ma, Z., Li, B., Zhao, B. et al. Are artificial wetlands good alternatives to natural wetlands for waterbirds? – A case study on Chongming Island, China. Biodiversity and Conservation 13, 333–350 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOC.0000006502.96131.59

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOC.0000006502.96131.59

Navigation