Skip to main content
Log in

Information Sharing in the Presence of Preemptive Incentives: Economic Consequences of Mandatory Disclosure

  • Published:
Review of Accounting Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thisstudy examines the welfare implications of a mandatory disclosurerequirement in an oligopolistic market, in which firms can choosetheir output either before or after the resolution of demanduncertainty. Two main results are derived. First, it is shownthat there exists a set of parameter values under which mandatorydisclosure is ineffective in the sense that it does not induceany change in the equilibrium production. Second, for some otherparameter values, imposing mandatory disclosure alters the firms'incentive structure in a way that gives rise to a Pareto lossin welfare; i.e., firms and consumers are made strictly worseoff. These two results suggest that the regulatory implicationsderived from the information-sharing literature should be interpretedwith caution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barth, M., M. McNichols, and P. Wilson. (1997). “Factors Influencing Firms' Disclosures about Environmental Liabilities.” Review of Accounting Studies 2, 35–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver, W.H. (1998). Financial Reporting: An Accounting Revolution (3rd edition). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brander, J.A., and T.R. Lewis. (1986). “Oligopoly and Financial Structure: The Limited Liability Effect.” American Economic Review 76, 956–970.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, S.H. (1997). “Incremental Information Content of Required Disclosures Contained in Management Discussion and Analysis.” Accounting Review 72, 285–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulow, J.I., J.D. Geanakoplos, and P.D. Klemperer. (1985). “Multimarket Oligopoly: Strategic Substitutes and Complements.” Journal of Political Economy 93, 488–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cason, T.N. (1994). “The Impact of Information Sharing Opportunities on Market Outcomes: An Experimental Study.” Southern Economic Journal 61, 18–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, U., A. Procassini, and G. Waymire. (1998). “The Use of Trade Association Disclosures by Investors and Analysts: Evidence from the Semiconductor Industry.” Working Paper, University of Iowa.

  • Clarke, R.N. (1983). “Collusion and the Incentives for Information Sharing.” Bell Journal of Economics 14, 383–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, P.M., J.L. Kao, and G.D. Richardson. (1994). “The Voluntary Inclusion of Forecasts in the MD&A Section of Annual Reports.” Contemporary Accounting Research 11, 423–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darrough, M. (1993). “Disclosure Policy and Competition: Cournot and Bertrand.” Accounting Review 68, 534–561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daughety, A.F., and J.F. Reinganum. (1994). “Asymmetric Information Acquisition and Behavior in Role Choice Models: An Endogenously Generated Signaling Game.” International Economic Review 35, 795–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R.K., and P.D. Jacobson. (1994). “Costs and Benefits of Business Information Disclosure.” Accounting Horizons 8, 80–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feltham, G.A., F.B. Gigler, and J.S. Hughes. (1992). “The Effects of Line-of-Business Reporting on Competition in Oligopoly Settings.” Contemporary Accounting Research 9, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal-Or, E. (1985a). “First and Second Mover Advantages.” International Economic Review 26, 649–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal-Or, E. (1985b). “Information Sharing in Oligopoly.” Econometrica 53, 329–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal-Or, E. (1986). “Information Transmission—Cournot and Bertrand Equilibria.” Review of Economic Studies 53, 85–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gal-Or, E. (1987). “First Mover's Disadvantages with Private Information.” Review of Economic Studies 54, 279–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, S. (1981). “The Informational Role of Warranties and Private Disclosure about Product Quality.” Journal of Law and Economics 24, 461–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J.S., and J.L. Kao. (1991). “Economic Implications of Alternative Disclosure Rules for Research and Development Costs.” Contemporary Accounting Research 8, 152–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J.S., and J.L. Kao. (1994). “Disclosure Rules and R&D Spending Revisited.” Contemporary Accounting Research 11, 633–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J.S., J.L. Kao, and A. Mukherji. (1998). “Oligopoly, Financial Structure, and Resolution of Uncertainty.” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 7, 67–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, Y., and A.J. Kirby. (2000). “Competitive Effects of Disclosure in a Strategic Entry Model.” Review of Accounting Studies 5, 57–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin, J.Y. (1996). “A Test for Information Sharing in Cournot Oligopoly.” Information Economics and Policy 8, 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao, J.L., and J.S. Hughes. (1993). “Note on Risk Aversion and Sharing of Firm Specific Information in Duopolies.” Journal of Industrial Economics 41, 103–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, L. (1985). “Cournot Oligopoly with Information Sharing.” Rand Journal of Economics 16, 521–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mailath, G.J. (1993). “Endogenous Sequencing of Firm's Decision.” Journal of Economic Theory 59, 169–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mautz, R.K., and W.G. May. (1978). Financial Disclosure in a Competitive Economy. New York, NY: Financial Executives Research Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. (1981). “Good News and Bad News: Representation Theorems and Application.” Bell Journal of Economics 12, 380–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novshek, W., and H. Sonnenshein. (1982). “Fulfilled Expectations Cournot Duopoly with Information Acquisition and Release.” Bell Journal of Economics 13, 214–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponssard, J. (1979). “The Strategic Role of Information on the Demand Function in an Oligopolistic Environment.” Management Science 25, 243–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raith, M. (1996). “A General Model of Information Sharing in Oligopoly.” Journal of Economic Theory 71, 260–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T. (1960). The Strategy of Conflict. Harvard University Press.

  • Shapiro, C. (1986). “Exchange of Cost Information in Oligopoly.” Review of Economic Studies 53, 433–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, B., and J. Brander. (1992). “Pre-commitment and Flexibility: Applications to Oligopoly Theory.” European Economic Review 36, 1601–1626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R.B. (1980). Corporations and Information: Secrecy Access, and Disclosure. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (1989). Securities Act Release No. 6835.

  • Vives, X. (1984). “Duopoly Information Equilibrium: Cournot and Bertrand.” Journal of Economic Theory 34, 71–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vives, X. (1990). “Trade Association Disclosure Rules, Incentives to Share Information, and Welfare.” Rand Journal of Economics 21, 409–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, R.L., and J.L. Zimmerman. (1986). Positive Accounting Theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziv, A. (1993). “Information Sharing in Oligopoly: The Truth Telling Problem.” Rand Journal of Economics 24, 455–464.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pae, S. Information Sharing in the Presence of Preemptive Incentives: Economic Consequences of Mandatory Disclosure. Review of Accounting Studies 5, 331–350 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026597606819

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026597606819

Navigation