Skip to main content
Log in

Distributed Control for 3D Metamorphosis

  • Published:
Autonomous Robots Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we define Proteo as a class of three-dimensional (3D) metamorphic robotic system capable of approximating arbitrary 3D shapes by utilizing repeated modules. Each Proteo module contains embedded sensors, actuators and a controller, and each resides in a 3D grid space. A module can move itself to one of its open neighbor sites under certain motion constraints. Distributed control for the self-reconfiguration of such robots is an interesting and challenging problem. We present a class of distributed control algorithms for the reconfiguration of Proteo robots based on the “goal-ordering” mechanism. Performance results are shown for experiments of these algorithms in a simulation environment, and the properties of these algorithms are analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bojinov, H., Casal, A., and Hogg, T. 2000. Emergent structures in modular self-reconfigurable robots. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA. pp. 1734–1741.

  • Chirikjian, G. 1993. Metamorphic hyper-redundant manipulators. In Proc. JSME International Conference on Advanced Mechatronics, pp. 467–472.

  • Chirikjian, G., Pamecha, A., and Ebert-Uphoff, I. 1996. Evaluating efficiency of self-reconfiguration in a class of modular robots. Journal of Robotic Systems, 13(5):317–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuda, T. and Kawauchi,Y. 1990. Cellular robotic system (CEBOT) as one of the realization of self-organizing intelligent universal manipulator. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 662–667.

  • Hamlin, G. and Sanderson, A. 1996. Tetrobot modular robotics: Prototype and experiments. In Proc. IEEE/RSJ International Symposium of Robotics Research, Osaka, Japan, pp. 390–395.

  • Hosokawa, K., Tsujimori, T., Fujii, T., Kaetsu, H., Asama, H., Kuroda, Y., and Endo, I. 1998. Self-organizing collective robots with morphogenesis in a vertical plane. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Leuven, Belgium, pp. 2858–2863.

  • Kotay, K., and Rus, D. 1999. Locomotion versatility through self-reconfiguration. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 26(2–3):217–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latombe, J.-C. 1991. Robot Motion Planning, Kluwer: Dordrecht, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murata, S., Kurokawa, H., and Kokaji, S. 1994. Self-assembling machine. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 441–448.

  • Murata, S., Kurokawa, H., Yoshida, E., Tomita, K., and Kokaji, S. 1998. A 3D self-reconfigurable structure. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Leuven, Belgium, pp. 432–439.

  • Nguyen, A., Guibas, L., and Yim, M. 2000. Controlled module density helps reconfiguration planning. In Workshop on the Algorithmic Foundations of Robotics, pp. TH15-TH27.

  • Pamecha, A., Chiang, C., Stein, D., and Chirikjian, G.S. 1996. Design and implementation of metamorphic robots. In Proc. ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference and Computers in Engineering Conference, Irvine, California.

  • Pamecha, A., Ebert-Uphoff, I., and Chirikjian, G.S. 1997. Useful metrics for modular robot motion planning. In Proc. IEEE Transactions on Robots and Automation, 13(4):531–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paredis, C. and Khosla, P. 1993. Kinematic design of serial link manipulators from task specifications. International Journal of Robotic Research, 12(3):274–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rus, D. and Vona, M. 1999. Self-reconfiguration planning with compressible unit modules. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Chicago, IL, pp. 2513–2520.

  • Rus, D. and Vona, M. 2000. A physical implementation of the self-reconfiguring crystalline robot. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA, pp. 1726–1733.

  • Unsal, C. and Khosla, P. 2000. Mechatronic design of a modualr selfreconfiguring robotic system. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Francisco, CA, pp. 1742–1747.

  • Walker, I. and Cavallaro, J. 1999. Keeping the analog genie in the bottle: A case for digital robots. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Chicago, IL, pp. 1063–1070.

  • Will, P., Castano, A., and Shen, W.-M. 1999. Robot modularity for self-reconfiguration. In SPIE International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Advanced Manufacturing Proc., Vol. 3839, pp. 236–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yim, M. 1994. New locomotion gaits. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, San Diego, CA, pp. 2508–2514.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yim, M., Zhang, Y., Lamping, J. et al. Distributed Control for 3D Metamorphosis. Autonomous Robots 10, 41–56 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026544419097

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026544419097

Navigation