Skip to main content
Log in

Psychometric Properties of the Long and Short Versions of the Young Schema Questionnaire: Core Beliefs Among Bulimic and Comparison Women

  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Young's Schema Questionnaire is a potentially valuable clinical and research tool for the investigation of core beliefs and has been well validated. However, at 205 items it is comparatively unwieldy. A briefer, 75-item version has recently been produced by Young, but lacks the psychometric validation that would demonstrate its utility relative to the longer version. The present study aimed to determine whether the long and short versions of the Schema Questionnaire have comparable psychometric properties among a clinical group of bulimics and a comparison group. The two forms had similar levels of internal consistency, and parallel forms reliability and discriminant validity, and their levels of clinical utility were broadly comparable. These findings support the use of the more convenient 75-item version of this questionnaire in clinical and research settings since its psychometric properties are similar to those of the long version. However, these results require replication with other clinical groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

  • Arnow, B., Kenardy, J., & Agras, W. S. (1992). Binge-eating among the obese: A descriptive study. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 15, 155–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, A. T., Emery, G., & Greenberg, R. (1985). Anxiety disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J. (1996). Cognitive therapy of personality disorders. In: P. M. Salkovskis (Ed.), Frontiers of cognitive therapy (pp. 165–181). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairburn, C. G. (1997). Eating disorders. In D. M. Clark & C. G. Fairburn (Eds.), Science and practice of cognitive behaviour therapy (pp. 209–241). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner, D. M., Vitousek, K. M., & Pike, K. M. (1997). Cognitive- behavioural therapy for anorexia bulimia nervosa. In D. M. Garner & P. E. Garfinkel (Eds.), Handbook of treatment for eating disorders (2nd ed., pp. 94–144).New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heatherton, T. F., & Baumeister, R. F. (1991). Binge eating as an escape from self-awareness. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 86–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennerley, H. (1997, July). Managing complex eating disorders using schema-based cognitive therapy. Paper presented at the British Association of Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy Conference. Canterbury, U.K.

  • Kovacs, M., & Beck, A. T. (1978). Maladaptive cognitive structures in depression. American Journal of Psychiatry, 135, 525–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, J. H. (1986). Pathogenesis. In L. J. Downey & J. C. Malkin (Eds.), Current approaches: Bulimia nervosa (pp. 17–26). Southampton, England: Duphar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layden, M. A., Newman, C. F., Freeman, A., & Morse, S. B. (1993). Cognitive therapy of borderline personality disorder. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, C., Waller, G., & Waters, A. (1998). Emotional states and bulimic psychopathology. In H. Hoek, J. Treasure, & M. Katzman (Eds.), The integration of neurobiology in the treatment of eating disorders (pp. 263–279). Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padesky, C. A. (1994). Schema change processes in cognitive therapy. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 1, 267–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root, M. P. P., & Fallon, P. (1989). Treating the victimized bulimic. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4, 90–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, N. B., Joiner, T. E., Young, J. E., & Telch, M. J. (1995). The SchemaQuestionnaire: Investigation of psychometric properties and the hierarchical structure of a measure of maladaptive schemas. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19, 295–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitousek, K. M. (1996). The current status of cognitive behavioral models of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. In P. M. Salkovskis (Ed.), Frontiers of cognitive therapy (pp. 383–418). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waller, G., Ohanian, V., Meyer, C., & Osman, S. (2000). Cognitive content among bulimic women: The role of core beliefs. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 28, 235–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1997). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders (2nd ed.). Chichester, England: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, G. T., Fairbum, C. G., & Agras, W. S. (1997). Cognitive- behavioural therapy for bulimia nervosa. In D. M. Garner & P. E. Garfinkel (Eds.), Handbook of treatment for eating disorders (2nd ed., pp. 67–93). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, A., Waller, G., & Gowers, S. (1994). Predictors of eating psychopathology in adolescent girls. European Eating Disorders Review, 2, 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. E. (1994). Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema-focused approach (2nd ed.). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. E. (1998). The Young Schema Questionnaire: Short form. Available in electronic form at http://.home.sprynet.com/sprynet/schema/ysqsl.htm.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waller, G., Meyer, C. & Ohanian, V. Psychometric Properties of the Long and Short Versions of the Young Schema Questionnaire: Core Beliefs Among Bulimic and Comparison Women. Cognitive Therapy and Research 25, 137–147 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026487018110

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026487018110

Navigation