Skip to main content
Log in

Caller ID – Whose Privacy Is It, Anyway?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Caller ID or CND (Calling Number Display) is an internationally-available telecommunication service first introduced into the United States about ten years ago. Caller ID utilizes a new form of technology which enables telephone subscribers to identify the numbers (and/or names) of callers before picking up their telephones. This service has been widely assailed as an invasion of the caller's right to anonymity, a right which allegedly subsists as an important component of the caller's right to privacy. However, if privacy is defined from the perspective of the British philosopher John Stuart Mill, it can be argued that, even though anonymity is in fact an implication of genuine privacy, placing an unsolicited telephone call does not constitute a private act. Indeed, many callers who routinely block their numbers from Caller ID display units (such as telemarketers and telecharities) falsely assert a right to place anonymous calls in order to expedite their own intrusion into the privacy of others. This conclusion will be strengthened by contrasting anonymous telephone calls with the much more legitimate appeals to anonymity made by Usenet bulletin boards in cyberspace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barash, D. M., Consumer Advocate v. The Bell Telephone Company of Pennsylvania: 1992, Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 605 A. 2d 1198.

  • Crook, R.: 1991, 'Sorry, Wrong Number: The Effect of Telephone Technology on Privacy Rights', Wake Forest Law Review 26, 669–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engström, T.: 1997, 'Corporate Appropriation of Privacy: The Transformation of the Personal and Public Spheres', Ethics and Behavior 7(3), 239–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Communications Commission: 1997, Caller ID Fact Sheet.

  • Fried, C.: 1984, 'Privacy', in F. Schoeman (ed.), Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy (Cambridge UP, Cambridge, U.K.), pp. 203–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerety, T.: 1977, 'Redefining Privacy', Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 12(2), 233–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerstein, R.: 1984, 'Intimacy and Privacy', in F. Schoeman (ed.), Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy (Cambridge UP, Cambridge, U.K.), p. 271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henroid, P.: 1998, 'Caller Intellidata: Privacy in the Developing Communications Industry', Washington University Law Quarterly 78, 351–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, G.: 1994, 'Who Are You? Identity and Anonymity in Cyberspace', University of Pittsburgh Law Review 55, 1177–1213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S.: 1957, Utilitarianism (Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis, IN), pp. 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S.: 1997, 'Essay on Liberty', in A. Hakim (ed.), Historical Introduction to Philosophy (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ), pp. 589–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissenbaum, H.: 1997, 'Toward an Approach to Privacy in Public: Challenges of Information Technology', Ethics and Behavior 7(3), 207–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parent, W.: 1983, 'Privacy, Morality, and the Law', in J. Callahan (ed.), Ethical Issues in Professional Life (Oxford UP, Oxford, U.K.), pp. 215–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quittner, J.: 1994, 'Life in Cyberspace: Stamp Electronic Mail with Name?', Newsday, 53.

  • Regan, P.: 1995, Legislating Privacy (University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC), p. xiii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoeman, F.: 1984, 'Privacy, Intimacy, and Personhood', in Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy (Cambridge UP, Cambridge, U.K.), p. 412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G.: 1989, 'We've Got Your Number (Is It Constitutional to Give It Out?): Caller Information Technology and the Right to Informational Privacy', UCLA Law Review 37, 145–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H.: 1994, Managing Privacy (University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprint: 1998, User Guide: Network Features Expressly for You.

  • Stover, D.: 1990, 'Look Who's Calling', Popular Science (July), 76–78, 95.

  • Warren, S. and L. Brandeis: 1890, 'The Right to Privacy', Harvard Law Review 4, 193–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittle, R.: 1996, 'Calling Display Number: AUSTEL's PAC Report', Australasian Privacy Law and Privacy Reporter 3(1) (March/April), 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferguson, K.G. Caller ID – Whose Privacy Is It, Anyway?. Journal of Business Ethics 29, 227–237 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026432924759

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026432924759

Navigation