Abstract
This study aims to examinethe process of scaffolding in terms ofteachers' and students' discussions, and howtransition from teacher regulation to studentregulation takes place during a learningproject carried out in a web-based learningenvironment. The participants were twosecondary school teachers from separateschools, together with their students. The datawere collected through videotaping. The resultsshowed the relationships betweenteacher-student discussions and teachers'conceptions of their role. The data as a wholeindicated a transition from other- toself-regulation in the classroom of oneteacher, but not the other. These findings arediscussed in terms of the teacher's role aschallenger, monitor and evaluator of studentlearning, and the implications for successfulscaffolding.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arvaja,M., Häkkinen, P., Eteläpelto, A. & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2000). Collaborative processes during report writing in a science learning project: The nature of discourse as a function of task requirements. European Journal of Psychology of Education 15: 455-466.
Bliss, J. & Askew, M. (1996). Effective teaching and learning: Scaffolding revisited. Oxford Review of Education 22: 37-61.
Brown, A. & Campione, J. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In L. Schauble and R. Glaser, eds, Innovations in Learning: New Environments for Education, pp. 289-325. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Crook, C. (2000). Motivation and the ecology of collaborative learning. In R. Joiner, K. Littleton, D. Faulkner and D. Miell, eds, Rethinking Collaborative Learning, pp. 161-178. London: Free Association Books.
Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. & Pressley, M. (1999). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction 17: 379-432.
Howe, C., Duchak-Tanner, V. & Tolmie, A. (2000). Co-ordinating support for conceptual and procedural learning in science. In R. Joiner, K. Littleton, D. Faulkner and D. Miell, eds, Rethinking Collaborative Learning, pp. 81-100. London: Free Association Books.
Joiner, R., Littleton, K., Faulkner, D. & Miell, D., eds (2000). Rethinking Collaborative Learning. London: Free Association Books.
Karasavvidis, I., Pieters, J. & Plomp, T. (2000). Investigating how secondary school students learn to solve correlational problems: Quantitative and qualitative discourse approaches to the development of self-regulation. Learning and Instruction 10: 267-292.
Karpov, Y. & Haywood, H. (1998). Two ways to elaborate Vygotsky's concept of mediation. Implications for instruction. American Psychologist 53: 27-36.
Light, P. & Light, V. (1999). Analysing asynchronous learning interactions: Computer-mediated communication in a conventional undergraduate setting. In K. Littleton and P. Light, eds, Learning with Computers, pp. 162-178. London: Routledge.
Light, P. & Littleton, K. (1999). Social Processes in Children's Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Linehan, C. & McCarthy, J. (2001). Reviewing the 'Community of practice' metaphor: An analysis of control relations in a primary school classroom. Mind, Culture, and Activity 8: 129-147.
Littleton, K., Faulkner, D., Miell, D., Joiner, R. & Häkkinen, P. (2000). Introduction. European Journal of Psychology of Education 15: 371-374.
Meloth, M. & Deering, P. (1999). The role of the teacher in promoting cognitive processing during collaborative learning. In A.M. O'Donnell and A. King, eds, Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning, pp. 235-255. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Mercer, N. (1995). The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk Amongst Teachers and Learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Mercer, N. (1996). The quality of talk in children's collaborative activity in the classroom. Learning and Instruction 6: 359-377.
Mercer, N. & Fisher, E. (1998). How do teachers help children to learn? An analysis of teachers' interventions in computer-based activities. In D. Faulkner, K. Littleton and M. Woodhead, eds, Learning Relationships in the Classroom, pp. 111-130. London: Routledge.
Mercer, N. & Wegerif, R. (1999). Is 'exploratory talk' productive talk? In K. Littleton and P. Light, eds, Learning with Computers, pp. 79-101. London: Routledge.
Murphy, P. (2000). Gender identities and the process of negotiation in social interaction. In R. Joiner, K. Littleton, D. Faulkner and D. Miell, eds, Rethinking Collaborative Learning, pp. 139-160. London: Free Association Books.
Rasku-Puttonen, H., Eteläpelto, A., Lehtonen, O., Nummila, L. & Häkkinen, P. (2000). Developing Teacher's Professional Expertise through Collaboration in an Innovative ICT-Based Learning Environment. Paper Presented at the ECER 2000 Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland, 20-23 September.
Rasku-Puttonen, H., Eteläpelto, A., Häkkinen, P. & Arvaja, M. (2002). Teacher's instructional scaffolding in an innovative information and communication technology-based history learning environment. Teacher Development 6: 269-288.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in Thinking. Cognitive Development in Social Context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rogoff, B., Matusov, E. & White, C. (1998). Models of teaching and learning: Participation in a community of learners. In D.R. Olson and N. Torrance, eds, The Handbook of Education and Human Development, pp. 388-414. Oxford: Blackwell.
Salomon, G. & Perkins, D. (1998). Individual and social aspects of learning. In P. Pearson and A. Iran-Nejad, eds, Review of Research in Education 23, pp. 1-24. Washington, DC: AERA.
Tolmie, A., Thomson, J. & Foot, H. (2000). The role of adult guidance and peer collaboration in child pedestrian training. In R. Joiner, K. Littleton, D. Faulkner and D. Miell, eds, Rethinking Collaborative Learning, pp. 101-118. London: Free Association Books.
Veer, R. van der & Valsiner, J. (1994). Introduction. In R. van der Veer and J. Valsiner, eds, The Vygotsky Reader. Oxford: Blackwell.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (Toim. M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner & E. Souberman). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Webb, N. & Farivar, S. (1999). Developing productive group interaction in middle school mathematics. In A.M. O'Donnell and A. King, eds, Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning, pp. 117-149. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wegerif, R., Mercer, N. & Dawes, L. (1999). From social interaction to individual reasoning: An empirical investigation of a possible socio-cultural model of cognitive development. Learning and Instruction 9: 493-516.
Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic Inquiry. Toward a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wertsch, J., Minick, N. & Arns, F. (1984). The creation of context in joint problem solving. In B. Rogoff and J. Lave, eds, Everyday Cognition: Its Development in Social Context, pp. 151-171. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wood, D. & Wood, H. (1996). Vygotsky, tutoring and learning. Oxford Review of Education 22: 5-17.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rasku-Puttonen, H., Eteläpelto, A., Arvaja, M. et al. Is successful scaffolding an illusion? – Shifting patterns of responsibility and control in teacher-student interaction during a long-term learning project. Instructional Science 31, 377–393 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025700810376
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025700810376