Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Electroantennographic and Behavioral Responses of the Sphinx Moth Manduca sexta to Host Plant Headspace Volatiles

  • Published:
Journal of Chemical Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coupled gas chromatography with electroantennographic detection (GC-EAD) using antennae of adult female Manduca sexta was employed to screen for olfactory stimulants present in headspace collections from four species of larval host plants belonging to two families: Solanaceae—Lycopersicon esculentum (tomato), Capiscum annuum (bell pepper), and Datura wrightii; and Martyniaceae—Proboscidea parviflora. Headspace volatiles were collected from undamaged foliage of potted, living plants. GC–EAD revealed 23 EAD-active compounds, of which 15 were identified by GC-mass spectrometry. Identified compounds included aliphatic, aromatic, and terpenoid compounds bearing a range of functional groups. Nine EAD-active compounds were common to all four host plant species: (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate, nonanal, decanal, phenylacetaldehyde, methyl salicylate, benzyl alcohol, geranyl acetone, (E)-nerolidol, and one unidentified compound. Behavioral responses of female moths to an eight-component synthetic blend of selected tomato headspace volatiles were tested in a laboratory wind tunnel. Females were attracted to the blend. A comparison of responses from antennae of males and females to bell pepper headspace volatiles revealed that males responded to the same suite of volatiles as females, except for (Z)-3-hexenyl benzoate. EAD responses of males also were lower for (Z)- and (E)-nerolidol and one unidentified compound. Electroantennogram EAG dose–response curves for the 15 identified EAD-active volatiles were recorded. At the higher test doses (10–100 μg), female antennae yielded larger EAG responses to terpenoids and to aliphatic and aromatic esters. Male antennae did respond to the higher doses of (Z)-3-hexenyl benzoate, indicating that they can detect this compound. On the basis of ubiquity of the EAD-active volatiles identified to date in host plant headspace collections, we suggest that M. sexta uses a suite of volatiles to locate and identify appropriate host plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, V. E. and Jacobson, M. 1972. Electrophysiological responses of four species of pest Lepidoptera to synthetic acetates and alcohols. J. Econ. Entomol. 65:1582–1585.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, R. A., Hamilton-Kemp, T. R., Loughrin, J. H., Hughes, C. G., Hildebrand, D. F., and Sutton, T. G. 1988. Green leaf headspace volatiles from Nicotiana tabacum lines of different trichome morphology. J. Agric. Food Chem. 36:295–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baur, R., Feeny, P., and Städler, E. 1993. Oviposition stimulants for the black swallowtail butterfly: Identification of electrophysiologically active compounds in carrot volatiles. J. Chem. Ecol. 19:919–937.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernays, E. A. and Chapman, R. F. 1994. Host-plant Selection by Phytophagous Insects. Chapman & Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttery, R. G., Ling, L. C., and Light, D. M. 1987. Tomato leaf volatile aroma components. J. Agric. Food Chem. 35:1039–1042.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinta, S., Dickens, J. C., and Aldrich, J. R. 1994. Olfactory reception of potential pheromones and plant odors by tarnished plant bug, Lygus lineolaris (Hemiptera: Miridae). J. Chem. Ecol. 20:3251–3267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T. A., Hildebrand, J. G., Tumlinson, J. H., and Doolittle, R. E. 1989. Sex pheromone blend of Manduca sexta: Responses of central olfactory interneurons to antennal stimulation in male moths. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 10:281–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossé, A. A. and Baker, T. C. 1999. Electrophysiologically and behaviorally active volatiles of buffalo gourd root powder for corn rootworm beetles. J. Chem. Ecol. 25:51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickens, J. C. 2000. Sexual maturation and temporal variation of neural responses in adult Colorado potato beetles to volatiles emitted by potato plants. J. Chem. Ecol. 26:1265–1279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, R. D. 1974. Chemotaxonomy of Flowering Plants. 4 Vols. McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groot, A. T., Timmer, R., Gort, G., Lelyveld, G. P., Drijfhout, F. P., Van Beek, T. A., and Visser, J. H. 1999. Sex-related perception of insect and plant volatiles in Lygocoris pabulinus. J. Chem. Ecol. 25:2357–2371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, B. S., van der Pers, J. N. C., and Löfqvist, J. 1989. Comparison of male and female olfactory cell response to pheromone compounds and plant volatiles in the turnip moth, Agrotis segetum. Physiol. Entomol. 14:147–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harborne, J. B. and Turner, B. L. 1984. Plant Chemosystematics. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, R. R. and Manukian, A. 1994. An automated system for use in collecting volatile chemicals released from plants. J. Chem. Ecol. 20:593–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebets, E. A. and Chapman, R. F. 2000. Electrophysiological studies of olfaction in the whip spider Phrynus parvulus (Arachnida, Amblypygi). J. Insect Physiol. 46:1441–1448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning, J. A. and Teuber, L. R. 1992. Combined gas chromatography-electroantennogram characterization of alfalfa floral volatiles recognized by honey bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 85:226–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand, J. G. 1995. Analysis of chemical signals by nervous systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand, J. G. 1996. Olfactory control of behavior in moths: Central processing of odor information and the functional significance of olfactory glomeruli. J. Comp. Physiol. A 178:5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, D. P. W., Gries, R., Borden, J. H., and Pierce, H. D. J. 2000. A survey of antennal responses by five species of coniferophagous bark beetles (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to bark volatiles of six species of angiosperm trees. Chemoecology 10:103–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson, M. and Anderson, P. 1999. Electrophysiological response to herbivore-induced host plant volatiles in the moth Spodoptera littoralis. Physiol. Entomol. 24:377–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaissling, K. E., Hildebrand, J. G., and Tumlinson, J. H. 1989. Pheromone receptor cells in the male moth Manduca sexta. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 10:273–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J. R., Christensen, T. A., and Hildebrand, J. G. 2000. Response characteristics of an identified, sexually dimorphic olfactory glomerulus. J. Neurosci. 20:2391–2399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, J. T., Tollsten, L., and Bergstrom, L. G. 1993. Floral scents—a checklist of volatile compounds isolated by head-space techniques. Phytochemistry 33:253–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. K. and Strausfeld, N. J. 1990. Structure, distribution and number of surface sensilla and their receptor cells on the olfactory appendage of the male moth Manduca sexta. J. Neurocytol. 19:519–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, D. M., Kamm, J. A., and Buttery, R. G. 1992. Electroantennogram response of alfalfa seed chalcid, Bruchophagus roddi (Hymenoptera: Eurytomidae) to host-and nonhost-plant volatiles. J. Chem. Ecol. 18:333–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughrin, J. H., Hamilton-Kemp, T. R., Andersen, R. A., and Hildebrand, D. F. 1990. Headspace compounds from flowers of Nicotiana tabacum and related species. J. Agric. Food Chem. 38:455–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luning, P. A., Ebbenhorst, S. T., de Rijk, T., and Roozen, J. P. 1995. Effect of hot-air drying on flavour compounds of bell peppers (Capsicum annuum). J. Sci. Food. Agric. 68:355–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mechaber, W. L. and Hildebrand, J. G. 2000. Novel, non-solanaceous hostplant record for Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) in the southwestern United States. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 93:447–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pophof, B. 1997. Olfactory responses recorded from sensilla coeloconica of the silkmoth Bombyx mori. Physiol. Entomol. 22:239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raguso, R. A., Light, D. M., and Pichersky, E. 1996. Electroantennogram responses of Hyles lineata (Sphingidae: Lepidoptera) to volatile compounds from Clarkia breweri (Onagraceae) and other moth-pollinated flowers. J. Chem. Ecol. 22:1735–1766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raguso, R. A. and Willis, M. A. 2002. Synergy between visual and olfactory cues in nectar feeding by naïve hawkmoths, Manduca sexta. Animal Behav. 64:685–695.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, R., Khan, Z. R., Caballero, P., and Juliano, B. O. 1990. Olfactory sensitivity of two sympatric species of rice leaf folders (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) to plant volatiles. J. Chem. Ecol. 16:2647–2666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, S. B. 1988. Host finding by moths: Sensory modalities and behaviours. J. Insect Physiol. 34:235–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, J. C. 1999. Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of the cabbage moth to plant volatiles. J. Chem. Ecol. 25:1867–1883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Röse, U. S. R., Lewis, W. J., and Tumlinson, J. H. 1998. Specificity of systemically released cotton volatiles as attractants for specialist and generalist parasitic wasps. J. Chem. Ecol. 24:303–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rospars, J. P. and Hildebrand, J. G. 2000. Sexually dimorphic and isomorphic glomeruli in the antennal lobes of the sphinx moth Manduca sexta. Chem. Senses 25:119–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Røstelien, T., Borg-Karlson, A.-K., Fäldt, J., Jacobsson, U., and Mustaparta, H. 2000a. The plant sesquiterpene germacrene D specifically activates a major type of antennal receptor neuron of the tobacco budworm moth Heliothis virescens. Chem. Senses 25:141–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Røstelien, T., Borg-Karlson, A.-K., and Mustaparta, H. 2000b. Selective receptor neurone responses to E-β-ocimene, β-myrcene, E,E-α-farnesene and homo-farnesene in the moth Heliothis virescens, identified by gas chromatography linked to electrophysiology. J. Comp. Physiol. A 186:833–847.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanes, J. R. and Hildebrand, J. G. 1976. Structure and development of antennae in a moth, Manduca sexta. Dev. Biol. 51:282–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoonhoven, L. M., Jermy, T., and van Loon, J. J. A. 1998. Insect-Plant Biology: From Physiology to Evolution. Chapman & Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, V. D. C. and Hildebrand, J. G. 1999a. Fine structure of antennal sensilla of the female sphinx moth, Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae). I. Trichoid and basiconic sensilla. Can. J. Zool. 77:290–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, V. D. C. and Hildebrand, J. G. 1999b. Fine structure of antennal sensilla of the female sphinx moth, Manduca sexta (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae). II. Auriculate, coeloconic, and styliform complex sensilla. Can. J. Zool. 77:302–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, V. D. C. and Hildebrand, J. G. 2001. Responses of a population of antennal olfactory receptor cells in the female moth Manduca sexta to plant-associated volatile organic compounds. J. Comp. Physiol. A 186:1135–1151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struble, D. L. and Arn, H. 1984. Combined gas chromatography and electroantennogram recording of insect olfactory responses, pp. 161–178, in H. E. Hummel and T. A. Miller (Eds). Techniques in Pheromone Research. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiéry, D. and Visser, J. H. 1986. Masking of host plant odour in the olfactory orientation of the Colorado potato beetle. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 41:165–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichenor, L. H. and Seigler, D. S. 1980. Electroantennogram and oviposition responses of Manduca sexta to volatile components of tobacco and tomato. J. Insect Physiol. 26:309–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topazzini, A., Mazza, M., and Pelosi, P. 1990. Electroantennogram responses of five Lepidoptera species to 26 general odourants. J. Insect Physiol. 36:619–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumlinson, J. H., Brennan, M. M., Doolittle, R. E., Mitchell, E. R., Brabham, A., Mazomenos, B. E., Baumhover, A. H., and Jackson, D. M. 1989. Identification of a pheromone blend attractive to Manduca sexta (L.) males in a wind tunnel. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol. 10:255–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Pers, J. N. C. 1981. Comparison of electroantennogram response spectra to plant volatiles in seven species of Yponomeuta and in the tortricid Adoxophyes orana. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 30:181–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Loon, J. J. A., Frentz, W. H., and van Eeuwijk, F. A. 1992. Electroantennogram responses to plant volatiles in two species of Pieris butterflies. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 62:253–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, J. H. 1988. Host-plant finding by insects: Orientation, sensory input and search patterns. J. Insect Physiol. 34:259–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser, J. H., Piron, P. G. M., and Hardie, J. 1996. The aphids' peripheral perception of plant volatiles. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 80:35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldrop, B. R., Harrow, I. D., Kovelman, R., and Hildebrand, J. G. 1986. Olfactory guided oviposition in the moth Manduca sexta: Host-plant preference and induction. Soc. Neurosci. Abs. 12:41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissbecker, B., Schütz, S., Klein, A., and Hummel, H. E. 1997. Analysis of volatiles emitted by potato plants by means of a Colorado beetle electroantennographic detector. Talanta 44:2217–2224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissbecker, B., van Loon, J. J. A., and Dicke, M. 1999. Electroantennogram responses of a predator, Perillus bioculatus, and its prey, Leptinotarsa decemlineata, to plant volatiles. J. Chem. Ecol. 25:2313–2325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weissbecker, B., van Loon, J. J. A., Posthumus, M. A., Bouwmeester, H. J., and Dicke, M. 2000. Identification of volatile potato sesquiterpenoids and their olfactory detection by the two-spotted stinkbug Perillus bioculatus. J. Chem. Ecol. 26:1433–1445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, R. T., Jenkins, R. Y., and Mcclusky, R. K. 1969. Factors determining the selection of plants for oviposition by the tobacco hornworm Manduca sexta. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 12:504–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, A. J., Linn, C., Wright, S., Prokopy, R., Reissig, W., and Roelofs, W. 1999. Identification of a new blend of apple volatiles attractive to the apple maggot, Rhagoletis pomonella. J. Chem. Ecol. 25:1221–1232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Q. H., Schlyter, F., and Birgersson, G. 2000. Bark volatiles from nonhost angiosperm trees of spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus (L.) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): Chemical and electrophysiological analysis. Chemoecology 10:69–80.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ARL Division of Neurobiology, University of Arizona, P.O. Box 210077, Tucson, Arizona, 85721-0077, USA

    Ann M. Fraser, Wendy L. Mechaber & John G. Hildebrand

  2. Center for Insect Science, University of Arizona, P.O. Box 210106, Tucson, Arizona, 85721-0106, USA

    Ann M. Fraser, Wendy L. Mechaber & John G. Hildebrand

Authors
  1. Ann M. Fraser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wendy L. Mechaber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. John G. Hildebrand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann M. Fraser.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fraser, A.M., Mechaber, W.L. & Hildebrand, J.G. Electroantennographic and Behavioral Responses of the Sphinx Moth Manduca sexta to Host Plant Headspace Volatiles. J Chem Ecol 29, 1813–1833 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024898127549

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024898127549

Search

Navigation