Abstract
This paper evaluates the use of climate-based information in drought mitigation in Ceará, Northeast Brazil. It examines two policies – a seed-distribution program (Hora de Plantar) and the Emergency Drought-Relief Program – that use climate information produced by FUNCEME (Ceará’s Foundation for Meteorological and Hydrological Resources) to implement drought planning. It argues that, in politically charged policy-making environments, the use of climate forecast information may go beyond its problem-solving function to influence broader issues of accountability and democratization. In Ceará’s politically charged environment, technocrats rely on scientific information about climate to insulate policy-making from both political ‘meddling’ and public accountability. However, insulation afforded by the use of climate information has played different roles in the policy areas examined in this study. While in drought emergency-relief planning the use of climate information critically contributed to the democratization of policy implementation, in agricultural planning, it worked towards further insulating decision-making from public accountability and client participation. Thus, the use of climate information is context-dependent, that is, the distribution of costs and benefits associated with information use in policymaking depends on the social, political, and cultural context in which information producers and users work. Moreover, climate information can be used in ways – positive or negative – significantly different from the use that information producers intended.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrade, F. C. (1985). Modelo de Umidade do Solo para Atividades Agricolas: Teoria e Praá tica. Fortaleza: FUNCEME.
Broad, K., A. Pfaff and M. Glantz (2002). ‘Effective and equitable dissemination of seasonal-to-interannual climate forecasts: Policy implications from the Peruvian fishery during the El Nino 1997–98,’ Climatic Change 54: 415–443.
Carvalho, O., C. A. G. Egler, M. M. C. L. Mattos, H. Barros, J. de Anchieta Moura Fé and C. Nobre (1993).Variabilidade Climaática e Planejamento da Ação Governamental no Nordeste Semi-Árido-Avaliaçã da Seca de 1993. Brasília: Secretaria de Planejamento, Orçamento e Coordenação da Presidência da Repùblica-SEPLAN-PR, Instituto Interamericano de Cooperação para a Agricultura (IICA).
Ceará, Governo do Estado do (1997). Levantamento dos Atuais Indicadores Climáticos e Sócio-Econômicos referente aos Municìpios do Estado. Fortaleza, CE: Secretaria do Trabalho e Açã o Social/CEDEC, Secretaria de Ciência e Tecnologia/FUNCEME, Secretaria de Desenvolvimento Rural/EMATERCE.
Ceará, Governo do Estado do (1995). Sustainable Development Plan of Ceará, Brazil 1995–1998. Fortaleza, Ce.
Centeno, M. A. and P. Silva, eds. (1998). ‘The politics of expertise in Latin America,’ in M. A. Centeno, P. Silva, eds., Politics of Expertise in Latin America. NewYork, NY: St. Martin's Press.
Etzioni-Halevy, E. (1983). Bureaucracy and Democracy: A Political Dilemma. Melbourne: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Ezrahi,Y. (1990). The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Geddes, B. (1990). ‘Building “state” autonomy in Brazil, 1930–1964,’ Comparative Politics 22 (2): 217–236.
Glantz, M. (1996). Currents of Change: El Nino's Impact on Climate and Society. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Goldsmith,W. W. and R.Wilson (1991). ‘Poverty and distorted industrialization in the Brazil Northeast,’ World Development 19 (5): 435–455.
Golnaraghi, M. and R. Kaul (1995). ‘The science of policymaking: Responding to El Nino,’ Environment 37 (4): 16–44.
Healy, R.G. and W. Ascher (1995). ‘Knowledge in the policy process: Incorporating new environmental information in natural resources policy making,’ Policy Sciences 28 (1): 1–19.
IAI (1994). El Nino-Southern Oscillation and Interannual ClimateVariability. Report of a Workshop to Develop the Scientific Agenda of the Inter-American Institute for Global Change Research (IAI). Lima, Peru: IAI.
IPLANCE (2000). Anuário Estatístico do Ceará. Fortaleza, CE: Secretaria do Planejamento.
Jamieson, D. (2000). ‘Prediction in society,’ in D. Sarewitz, R. Pielke, Jr. and R. Byerly, Jr., eds., Prediction: Science, Decision Making and the Future of Nature.Washington DC: Island Press.
Jasanoff, S. (1990). The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lemos, M. C., T. Finan, R. Fox, D. Nelson and J. Tucker (2002). ‘The use of seasonal climate forecasting in policymaking: Lessons from northeast Brazil,’ Climatic Change 55 (4), 479–507.
Magalhães, A. R., H. C. Filho, F. L. Garagorry, J. G. Gasques, L. C. B. Molion, M. do S. A. Neto, C. A. Nobre, E. R. Porto and O. E. Rebouças (1988). ‘The effects of climatic variations on agriculture in northeast Brazil,’ in M. L. Parry, T. R. Carter and N. T. Konijn, eds., The Impact of Climate Variations on Agriculture. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Magalhã es, A. R., J. R. Abreu Vale, A. Bezerra Peixoto and A. de Pádua Franco Ramos (1991). Respostas Governamentais às Secas: Experiência de 1987 no Nordeste. Fortaleza: Imprensa Oficial do Ceará.
Moraes, F. (2001). ‘A volta da competitividade eleitoral’ [Web Journal], Conjuntura Política, no. 20, julho 2000. Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política e Departamento de Ciência Política da UFMG, 2000 [cited July 13 2001]. Available from http://cevep.ufmg.br/bacp/julho020/moraes020. htm.
Moura, A. D., L. Bengtsson, J. Buizer, A. Busalacchi, M. A. Cane, P. Lagos, A. Leetmaa, T. Matsuno, K. Mooney, P. Morel, E. S. Sarachik, J. Shukla, A. Sumi and M. Patterson (1992). International Research Institute for Climate Prediction: A Proposal. U.S. National Research Council of the National Academy of Sciences-Advisory Panel for the Tropical Oceans/Global Atmosphere (TOGA) Program.
Nunes, E. de O. and B. Geddes (1987). ‘Dilemmas of state-led modernization in Brazil', in J. D. Wirth, E. de O. Nunes and T. E. Bogenschild, eds., State and Society in Brazil: Continuity and Change. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Orlove, B. and J. Tosteson (1999). ‘Case studies in the application of ENSO forecasts: Lessons from Australia, Peru, Brazil, Ethiopia, and Zimbabwe,’ Environmental Politics Working Papers Series. Institute of International Studies, University of California at Berkeley.
Pessoa, D. (1987). ‘Drought in northeast Brazil: Impact and government response,’ in D. A. Wilhite, W. E. Easterling and D. A. Wood, eds., Planning for Drought. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Pfaff, A., K. Broad and M. Glantz(1999). ‘Who benefits from climate forecasts?,’ Nature 397 (February): 645–646.
Pielke, Jr., R. (2000). ‘Policy responses to El Niño 1997–1998,’ in S. A. Changnon, ed., El Niño1997–1998:The Climate Event of the Century. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
Roncoli, C., K. Ingram and P. Kirshen (2001). ‘The costs of risks of coping with drought: Livelihood impacts and farmers' responses in Burkina Faso,’ Climate Research 19 (2): 119–132.
Sarewitz, D. and R. Pielke, Jr. (1999). ‘Prediction in science and policy,’ Technology and Society 21: 121–133.
Sarewitz, D., R. Pielke, Jr. and R. Byerly, Jr., eds. (2000). Prediction: Science, Decision Making, and the Future of Nature.Washington DC: Island Press.
Schneider, B. R. (1993). ‘The career connection: A comparative analysis of bureaucratic preferences and insulation,’ Comparative Politics 25 (3): 331–350.
Steel, B. S., S. Davenport and R. L. Warner (1993). ‘Are civil servants really public servants? A study of bureaucratic attitudes in the U.S., Brazil, and Korea,’ International Journal of Public Administration 16 (3): 409–442.
Tendler, J. (1997). Good Government in the Tropics. Baltimore, MA: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Villa, M. A. (2000).Vida e Morte no Sertão. São Paulo: Editora Ática.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
De Mello Lemos, M.C. A tale of two policies: The politics of climate forecasting and drought relief in Ceará, Brazil. Policy Sciences 36, 101–123 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024893532329
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024893532329