Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Choice of Principal Variables for Computing some Measures of Human Well-being

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the choice ofprincipal variables for computing three humandevelopment indicators, namely, the HumanDevelopment Index (HDI), the Gender-RelatedDevelopment Index (GDI), and the GenderEmpowerment Measure (GEM). To this end, datafrom the 1999 Human Development Reportare used. Empirical results providejustification for selecting only one componentof each indicator. The paper also suggests analternative weighting scheme should all thethree components of each indicator be retained.The implications of these results fordevelopment policy are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bardhan, K. and S. Klasen: 1999, 'UNDP's Gender-Related Indices: a critical review',World Development 27, pp. 985-1010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, R. and M. Weale: 1992, 'On measuring the quality of life', World Development 20, pp. 119-131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, A. G.: 2002, 'Revisiting UNDP's GDI and GEM: towards an alternative', Social Indicators Research 57, pp. 301-338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunteman, G. H.: 1989, Principal components analysis (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, N. and P. Streteen: 1979, 'Indicators of development: the search for a basic needs yardstick', World Development 7, pp. 567-580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, M.: 1991, 'Human Development revisited: a new UNDP report,' World Development 19, pp. 1469-1473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe, I. T.: 1972, 'Discarding variables in a principal component analysis. I. Artificial data', Applied Statistics 21, pp. 160-173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe, I. T.: 1973, 'Discarding variables in a principal component analysis. II. Real data', Applied Statistics 22, pp. 21-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGillivray, M.: 1991, 'The Human Development Index: yet another redundant composite development indicator?', World Development 19, pp. 1461-1468.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGillivray, M. and H. White: 1993, 'Measuring development? The UNDPs Human Development Index', Journal of International Development 5, pp. 193-205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D. F.: 1967, Multivariate statistical methods (McGraw-Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogwang, T.: 1994, The choice of principal variables for computing the Human Development Index', World Development 22, pp. 2011-2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillarisetti, J. R. and M. McGillivray: 1998, 'Human Development and Gender Empowerment: methodological and measurement issues', Development Policy Review 6, pp. 197-209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram, R.: 1982, 'Composite indices of physical quality of life, basic needs fulfilment and income: a principal component representation', Journal of Development Economics 11, pp. 227-247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, V. V. B.: 1991, 'Human Development Report 1990: review and assessment', World Development 19, pp. 1451-1460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastavan, T. N.: 1994, Human Development: a new paradigm or reinvention of the wheel?', American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 84, pp. 238-243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streteen, P.: 1994, Human Development: means and ends', American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 84, pp. 238-243.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme: 1990, Human Development Report 1990 (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme: 1993, Human Development Report 1993 (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme: 1994, Human Development Report 1994 (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme: 1995, Human Development Report 1995 (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme: 1999, Human Development Report 1999 (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Economics Program, University of Northern British Columbia, 3333 University Way, Prince George, British Columbia, V2N 4Z9

    Tomson Ogwang

  2. Department of Economics, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, S4S 0A2

    Abdella Abdou

Authors
  1. Tomson Ogwang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Abdella Abdou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomson Ogwang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ogwang, T., Abdou, A. The Choice of Principal Variables for Computing some Measures of Human Well-being. Social Indicators Research 64, 139–152 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024788123572

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024788123572

Keywords

Search

Navigation