Skip to main content
Log in

Beyond KT/V: Redefining adequacy of dialysis in the 21st century

  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Scribner BH. Some thoughts on research to define adequacy of dialysis. Kidney Int (Suppl) 1975; 2: S3–S5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Depner TA. How will the results of the HEMO study impact dialysis practice? Seminars in Dialysis 2003; 16: 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gotch FA, Sargent JA. A mechanistic analysis of the National Cooperative Dialysis Study (NCDS). Kidney Int 1985; 28: 526–534.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blake P. Nephrology forum. Kidney Int 2003 (in press).

  5. Lowrie EG, Laird NM, Parker TF, Sargent JA. Effect of the hemodialysis prescription on patient morbidity. Report from the National Cooperative Dialysis Study. NEJM 1981; 305: 1176–1181.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sargent JA, Gotch FA. The analysis of concentration depend-ence of uremic lesions in clinical studies. Kidney Int 1975; 7 (Suppl 2): S35–S44.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lowrie E. The normalized treatment ratio (Kt/V) is not the best dialysis dose parameter. Blood Purif 2000; 18: 286–294.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Teehan BP, Schleifer CR, Sigler MH, Gilgore GS. A quantitative approach to the CAPD prescription. Perit Dial Bull 1985; 5: 152–156.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lowrie EG, Chertow GM, Lew NL et al. The urea {clearance × dialysis time product} (Kt) as an outcome – based measure of hemodialysis dose. Kidney Int 1999; 56: 729–737.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lowrie EG, Zhu X, Lew NL. Primary associates of mortality among dialysis patients: Trends and reassessment of Kt/V and urea reduction ratio as outcome based measures of dialysis dose. Am J Kidney Dis 1998; 32 (suppl 4): S16–S31.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gotch FA. How will the results of HEMO study impact dialysis practice? Seminars in Dialysis 2003; 16: 11–13.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Teehan BP, Schleifer CR, Brown JM et al. Urea kinetic analysis and clinical outcome on CAPD. A five year longitudinal study. Adv Perit Dial 1990; 6: 181–185.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Popovich RP, Moncrief JW. Kinetic modeling of peritoneal transport. Contr Nephrol 1979; 17: 59–72.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Paniagua R, Amato D, Vonesh E et al. Effects of increased peritoneal clearances on mortality rates in peritoneal dialysis: ADEMEX, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13: 1307–1320.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eknoyan G, Beck GJ, Cheung AK et al. Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis. New Engl J Med. 2003; 347: 2010–2019.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lindsay RM, Blake PG. How will the results of the HEMO study impact dialysis practice? Seminars in Dialysis 2003; 16: 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vanholder R, DeSmet R, Lesaffer G. Dissociation between dialysis adequacy and Kt/V. Seminars in Dialysis 2002; 15: 3–7

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bargman JM, Thorpe KE, Churchill DN. Relative contribution of residual renal function and peritoneal clearance to adequacy of dialysis: A reanalysis of the CANUSA study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001; 12: 2158–2162.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Daugirdas JT et al. Body size, dose of hemodialysis, and mortality. AJKD 2000; 35(1): 80–88.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Port FK, Ashby VB, Dhingra RK et al. Dialysis dose and body mass index, are strongly associated with survival in hemodialysis patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13: 1061–1067.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Owen WF, Price P. African-Americans on maintenance dialysis: A review of racial differences in incidence, treatment and survival. Adv Renal Repl Ther 1997; 4: 2–12.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kopple JD, Lew NL, Zhu X, Lowrie EG. Body weight predicts mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients. JASN 1997; 8: 199A (Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Chertow GM, Owen WF, Lazarus JM et al. The interplay of uremia and malnutrition: An hypothesis for the reverse J-shaped curve between URR and mortality. Kidney Int 1999; 56: 1872–1878.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Li Z, Lew NL, Lazarus MJ, Lowrie EG. Comparing the urea reduction ratio and the urea product as outcome based measure of hemodialysis dose. Am J Kidney Dis 2000; 35: 598–605.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Harty J, Boulton H, Heelis N et al. Limitations of kinetic models as predictors of nutritional and dialysis adequacy in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients. Am J Nephrol 1993; 13: 454–463.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rotellar E, Martinez E, Samso JM et al. Why dialyse more than 6 hours a week? Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 1985; 31: 538–545.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Twardowski ZJ. Holistic approach to dialysis adequacy. J Hemod 2002.

  28. Wizeman V, Kramer W. Short-term dialysis – Long-term complications. Blood Purif 1987; 5 193–201

    Google Scholar 

  29. Goodkin DA, Young EW. An update on the dialysis outcomes and practice patterns (DOPPS). Contemp Dial and Nephrol 2001; 36–40.

  30. Keshaviah PR, Nolph KD, Van Stone JC. The peak concentration hypothesis: A urea kinetic approach to comparing the adequacy of CAPD and hemodialysis. Perit Dial Int 1989; 9: 257–260.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Adequacy of dialysis and nutrition in Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis: Association with clinical outcomes. J Am Soc Nephrol 1996; 7: 198–207.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Quellhorst EA, Schuenemann B, Hildebrand U. Morbidity and Mortality in Long-Term Hemofiltration. ASAIO J 1983; 6: 185–191.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Locatelli F. How will the results of the HEMO study impact dialysis practice? Seminars in Dialysis 2003; 16: 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Brown EA, Davies SJ, Rutherford P et al. European APD outcome study group (EAPOS): Ultrafilitration and not solute transport status predicts outcome at 2 years for APD in anuric patients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002; 13 (Abstract).

  35. Bargman JM. Need to pause and reconsider our slavish attention to small solute clearance. Perit Dial Int.

  36. Piraino B. ADEMEX: How should it arrange my practice? Perit Dial Intern 2000.

  37. Leypold JK, Cheung AK, Curoll CE et al. Effect of dialysis membranes and middle molecules removal on chronic hemodialysis survival. Am J Kidney 1999; 33: 349–355.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Chara B, Jean G, Hurot J-M et al. Clinical determination of dry body weight. Hemodial Intern 2001; 5: 42–50.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Luik AJ, Sande FM, Weideman P et al. The influence of increasing dialysis treatment time and reducing dry weight on blood pressure control in hemodialysis patients: A prospective study. Am J Nephrol 2001; 21: 471–478.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bleyer AJ, Russel GB, Setko SG. Sudden and cardiac death rates in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 1999; 55: 1553–1559.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Scribner BH, Oreopoulos DG. The hemodialysis product (HDD): A better index of dialysis Adequacy than Kt/V. Dial & Transpl 2002; 31: 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Psimenos G. “Psychodialysis”: A key element for adequate hemodialysis. Dial & Transpl 2003; 32: 2–5

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oreopoulos, D.G. Beyond KT/V: Redefining adequacy of dialysis in the 21st century. Int Urol Nephrol 34, 393–403 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024426003688

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024426003688

Keywords

Navigation