Abstract
This study with three experiments examined thenotion inherent in the Interactive ConstituencyModel of Perfetti and colleagues [Perfetti, C.A.,Liu, Y. & Tan, L.H. (2002) In H.S.R. Kao, C.K. Leong &D.-G. Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 35–60). Hong Kong: Hong Kong UniversityPress; Perfetti, C.A. & Tan, L.H. (1999) In J. Wang,A.W. Inhoff & H.-C. Chen (Eds.), ReadingChinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 115–134).Mahwah, New Hersey: Lawrence Erlbaum] thatin reading 2-character Chinese wordsphonology is activated at the character levelrather than at the word level. Specifically,the effect of phonological inconsistency(multiple pronunciations) of constituentcharacters on the visual recognition of2-character Chinese words found by Tan andPerfetti (Experiment 2) [(1999) Journal ofExperimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, andCognition, 25, 382–393] was furthertested in 2 lexical decision experiments (1and 2a) with sample sizes of 42 and 47 nativeCantonese-speaking Chinese university students.Using the same stimulus materials with someneeded slight variations, the two experimentsfound the target items with the constituentinconsistent characters were processed fasterthan the control two-character words withconsistent characters and this inconsistencyeffect of heterophonic homographs would stillbe compatible with character-level phonology. The words with the consistent constituentcharacter on the left (inconsistency on theright constituent) were processed faster thanthose with the consistent constituent characteron the right (inconsistency on the leftconstituent). In Experiment 2b the control orconsistent words were named faster than thecorresponding inconsistent words and there wasno left–right positional difference for theinconsistency. Taken together, the two lexicaldecision experiments and the naming experimentuphold the generality of character-levelconsistency effect of heterophonic homographs,even though there are some slight variationsfrom the original study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnett, V. & Lewis, T. (1984). Outliers in statistical data (2nd Ed.). New York: John Wiley.
Chinese University of Hong Kong Humanities Research Institute (2000). A Chinese talking syllabary of the Cantonese dialect: An electronic repository with Chinese indices. HongKong: Author (http://hermes.arts.cuhk.edu.hk/Lexic/Canton2/open.html) [in Chinese].
Fang, S.P., Horng, R.Y. & Tzeng, O.J.L. (1986). Consistency effects in the Chinese character and pseudo-character naming tasks. In H.S.R. Kao & R. Hoosain (Eds.), Linguistics, psychology, and the Chinese language (pp. 11-21). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Huang, J.-T. & Liu, I.-M. (1978). Paired associate learning proficiency as a function of frequency count, meaningfulness, and imagery value in Chinese two-character ideograms. Acta Psychologica Taiwanica, 20, 5-17.
Huang, J.-T. & Wang, M-Y. (1992). From unit to Gestalt: Perceptual dynamics in recognizing Chinese characters. In H.-C. Chen & O.J.L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 3-35). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Hue, C.-W. (1992). Recognition processes in character naming. In H.-C. Chen & O.J.L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 93-107). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Kayamoto, Y., Yamada, J. & Takashima, H.-O. (1998). The consistency of multiplepronunciation effects in reading: The case of Japanese logographs. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 27, 619-637.
Leong, C.K. (1997). Paradigmatic analysis of Chinese word reading: Research findings and classroom practices. In C.K. Leong & R.M. Joshi (Eds.), Cross-language studies of learning to read and spell: Phonologic and orthographic processing (pp. 379-417). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Leong, C.K. (1999). What can we learn from dyslexia in Chinese? In I. Lundberg, F.I. T Ønnessen & I. Austad (Eds.), Dyslexia: Advances in theory and practice (pp. 117-139). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Leong, C.K. & Tamaoka, K. (Eds.) (1998). Cognitive processing of the Chinese and the Japanese languages. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Leong, C.K., Cheng, P.-W. & Mulcahy, R. (1987). Automatic processing of morphemic orthography by mature readers. Language and Speech, 30, 181-197.
Liu, I.-M. (1999). Character and word recognition in Chinese. In J. Wang, A.W. Inhoff & H.-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 173-187). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Liu, I.-M., Chuang, C.J. & Wang, S.C. (1975). Frequency count of 40,000 Chinese words. Taipei: Lucky Books [in Chinese].
Perfetti, C.A. & Tan, L.H. (1999). The constituency model of Chinese word identification. In J. Wang, A.W. Inhoff & H.-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 115-134). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Perfetti, C.A., Liu, Y. & Tan, L.H. (2002). How the mind can meet the brain in reading: A comparative writing systems approach. In H.S.R. Kao, C.K. Leong & D.-G. Gao (Eds.), Cognitive neuroscience studies of the Chinese language (pp. 35-60). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
Ratcliff, R. (1993). Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 510-532.
Seidenberg, M.S., Waters, G.S., Barnes, M.A.& Tanenhaus, M.A. (1984).When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, 383-404.
Spinks, J.A., Liu, Y., Perfetti, C.A. & Tan, L.H. (2000). Reading Chinese characters for meaning: The role of phonological information. Cognition, 76, B1-B11.
Taft, M. & Zhu, X.-P. (1997). Submorphemic processing in reading Chinese. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 761-775.
Tan, L.H. & Perfetti, C.A. (1998).Phonological code as early sources of constraint in Chinese word identification: A review of current discoveries and theoretical accounts. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10, 155-164.
Tan, L.H. & Perfetti, C.A. (1999). Phonological activation in visual identification of Chinese two-character words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 382-393.
Wydell, T.N. (1998). What matters in kanji word naming: Consistency, regularity, or On/Kun reading difference? Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10, 359-373.
Zhou, X.-L. & Marslen-Wilson, W. (1999). Sublexical processing in reading Chinese. In J. Wang, A.W. Inhoff & H.-C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognitive analysis (pp. 37-63). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ziegler, J.C., Tan, L.H., Perry, C.& Montant, M. (2000). Phonology matters: The phonological frequency effect in written Chinese. Psychological Science, 11, 234-238.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Loeng, C.K., Cheng, PW. Consistency effects on lexical decision and naming of two-character Chinese words. Reading and Writing 16, 455–474 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024243507278
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024243507278