Skip to main content
Log in

Privatization and Public Opinion in Germany

  • Published:
Public Organization Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Privatization has been a major issue around the world, but research on public opinion about it has been scarce. The German Social Survey provides an opportunity to compare citizen opinions from a formerly socialist-authoritarian regime with those from a democratic regime, in their opinions about privatizing banks, electrical power, and hospitals. As do citizens in surveys in other nations, Germans support privatization of the services in the order just given. Citizens from the east, where privatization led to sharp increases in unemployment, oppose privatization much more than do westerners. A LISREL analysis indicates that their opposition is not due to their concerns about its economic effects on themselves or the nation (“economic pessimism”), but more due to perception of the proper role of government (“opposition to government spending”), and sense of political efficacy. The analysis also reflects on the roles of other variables such as ideology, partisanship, gender, being unemployed, education, and preference for taxes versus public services. We discuss implications for theory and research on public opinion about government policies and services, such as the role of direct economic self-interest versus more symbolic and ideological orientations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almond, Gabriel A., Russell J. Dalton, and G. Bingham Powell (eds.) (1989). European Politics Today. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barberis, Nicholas, Maxim Boycko, Andrei Shleifer, and Natalia Tsukanova. (1996). “How Does Privatization Work?: Evidence from the Russian Shops.” Journal of Political Economy 104, 764‐790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Paul Allen, Hal G. Rainey, and Carol Traut. (1990). “Disadvantage, Disaffection, and Race as Divergent Bases for Citizen Fiscal Policy Preferences.” Journal of Politics 52, February, 71‐93.

  • Beck, Paul Allen, Hal G. Rainey, Keith Nichols, and Carol Traut. (1987). “Citizen Views of Taxes and Services: A Tale of Three Cities.” Social Science Quarterly 68, June, 223‐243.

  • Behrend, Hanna (ed.) (1995). German Unification: The Destruction of an Economy. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, Kenneth A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, Kenneth A., and Scott Long (eds.) (1993). Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyne, George A. “Bureaucratic Theory Meets Reality: Public Choice and Service Contracting in U.S. Local Government.” Public Administration Review 58(6), 474‐484.

  • Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson. (1989). Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, Mark. How Governments Privatize: The Politics of Divestment in the United States and Germany. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press (forthcoming).

  • Cyert, Richard M., and James G. March. (1992). A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, 2nd Edition. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daft, Richard L. (2000). Organization Theory and Design, 7th Edition Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, Russell J. (1996). Citizen Politics in Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 2nd Edition Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, Russell J. (1988). Citizen Politics in Western Democracies. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, Russell J. (1993). Politics in Germany, 2nd Edition New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duch, Raymond M. (1993). “Tolerating Economic Reform: Popular Support for Transition to a Free Market in the Former Soviet Union.” American Political Science Review 87, 590‐608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finifter, Ada W., and Ellen Mickiewicz. (1992). “Redefining the Political System of the USSR: Mass Support for Political Change.” American Political Science Review 86, 857‐874.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funk, C.L. (2000). “The Dual Influence of Self-Interest and Societal Interest in Public Opinion.” Political Research Quarterly 53, March, 37‐62.

  • Hatcher, Larry. (1994). A Step-by-Step Approach to using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D., B.A. Gutek, R.L. Kahn, and E. Barton. (1975). Bureaucratic Encounters: A Pilot Study in the Evaluation of Government Services. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, Richard R., Thad A. Brown, and David O. Sears. (1978). “Self-Interest and Civilians: Attitudes Toward the Vietnam War.” Public Opinion Quarterly 464‐483.

  • Lowry, David. “Consumer Sovereignty and Quasi-Market Failure.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8(2), 137‐172.

  • McConahay, John B. (1982). “Self-Interest versus Racial Attitudes as Correlates of Anti-Busing Attitudes in Louisville: Is it the Buses or the Blacks?” Journal of Politics 44, 692‐720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Arthur H., Vicki L. Hesli, and William M. Reisinger. (1994). “Reassessing Mass Support for Political and Economic Change in the Former USSR.” American Political Science Review 88, 399‐411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulaik, Stanley A., Larry R. James, Judith Van Alstine, Nathan Bennett, Sherri Lind, and C. Dean Stilwell. “Evaluation of Goodness-of-Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models.'s Psychological Bulletin 105, 430‐445.

  • Peters, B. Guy. (1984). The Politics of Bureaucracy. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkin, Samuel L. (1994). The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. 2nd Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainey, Hal G. (1997). Understanding and Managing Public Organizations. 2nd Edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrschneider, Robert. (1994). “Report from the Laboratory: The Influence of Institutions on Political Elites' Democratic Values in Germany.” American Political Science Review 88, 927‐941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savas, Emanuel S. (2000). Privatization and Public-Private Partnerships. New York: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sclar, Elliot D. (2000). You Don'st Always Get What You Pay For: The Economics of Privatization. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, David O., and C.L. Funk. (1991). “The Role of Self-Interest in Social and Political Attitudes.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 24, 1‐91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, David O., Richard R. Lau, Tom R. Tyler, and Harris M. Allen, Jr. (1980). “Self-Interest vs. Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitudes and Presidential Voting.” American Political Science Review 74, 670‐684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, Elaine B. (1999). The Sometime Connection: Public Opinion and Social Policy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tedin, Kent L. (1994). “Self-Interest, Symbolic Values, and the Financial Equalization of Public Schools.” Journal of Politics 56, 628‐649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Lyke, and Richard C. Elling. (2000). “Mapping Patterns of Support for Privatization in the Mass Public: The Case of Michigan.” Public Administration Review 60, July/August, 338‐348.

  • Welsch, Friedrich J., and Jose V. Carrasquero. (2000). “Perceptions of State Reform in Latin America.” International Social Science Journal 52, 31‐38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheaton, Blair, Begnt Muthen, Duane F. Alwin, and Gene F. Summers. (1983). “Assessing Reliability and Stability in Panel Models,” In David Heise (ed.), Sociological Methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Legge, J.S., Rainey, H.G. Privatization and Public Opinion in Germany. Public Organization Review 3, 127–149 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024216313373

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024216313373

Navigation