Skip to main content
Log in

Manometry of the Lower Esophageal Sphincter: Inter- and Intraindividual Variability of Slow Motorized Pull-Through Versus Station Pull-Through Manometry

  • Published:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interindividual and intraindividual variability of slow motorized pull-through lower esophageal sphincter (LES) manometry compared to standard station pull-through LES manometry to measure LES overall length, abdominal length, and pressure and to report normal values for the slow motorized pull-through method. The slow motorized pull-through had significantly smaller coefficient of variation, indicating closer agreement between different examiners in analyzing a given tracing. The correlation coefficients for each parameter in normal subjects and symptomatic patients was significantly higher when using slow motorized pull-through for both patients and normal subjects for all three parameters. The 5th percentile of normal values obtained from 41 volunteers for LES overall length, abdominal length, and pressure was 2.7 cm, 1.4 cm, 5.1 mm Hg, respectively. The results indicate that the slow motorized pull-through method is more reproducible than the standard station pull-through method both between different observers and when the same examiner measures the same tracing on two different occasions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fein M, Ritter MP, De Meester TR, Oberg S, Peters JH, Hagen JA, Bremner CG: Role of the lower esophageal sphincter and hiatal hernia in the pathogenesis of gastr oesophageal reflux disease. J Gastrointest Surg 4:405-410, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  2. O'Sullivan GC, De Meester TR, Joelsson BE, Smith RB, Blough RR, Johnson LF, Skinner DB: Interaction of lower esophageal sphincter pressure and length of sphincter in the abdomen as determinants of gastroesophageal competence. Am J Surg 143:40-47, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bonavina L, Evander A, De Meester TR, Walther B, Cheng S-C, Palazzo L, Concannon JL: Length of the distal esophageal sphincter and competency of the cardia. Am J Surg 151:25-34, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  4. Zaninotto G, De Meester TR, Schwizer W, Johansson K-E, Cheng S-C: The lower esophageal sphincter in health and disease. Am J Surg 155:104-111, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  5. Campos GM, De Meester SR, Peters JH, Oberg S, Crookes PF, Hagen JA, Bremner CG, Sillin LF 3rd, Mason RJ, DeMeester TR: Predictive factors of Barrett esophagus: multivariate analysis of 502 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Arch Surg 136(11):1267-1273, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fox JE, Vidins EI. Beck IT: Observer variation in esophageal pressure assessment. Gastroenterology. 65:884-888, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  7. Campos GM, Crookes PF, Oberg S, Gastal OL, Theisen J, Nigro J, Bremner CG, Peters JH, DeMeester TR: A New standardized method for measurement of the lower esophageal sphincter. Gastroenterology 114:A730, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  8. Welch RW, Drake ST: Normal lower esophageal sphincter pressure: a comparison of rapid vs slow pull-through techniques. Gastroenterology 78:1446-1451, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schoeman MN, Tippet MD, Akkermans LM, Dent J, Holloway RH: Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in ambulant healthy human subjects. Gastroenterology 108:83-91, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dent J, Dodds WJ, Friedman RH, Sekiguchi T, Hogan WJ, Arndorfer RC, Petrie DJ: Mechanism of gastroesophageal reflux in recumbent asymptomatic human subjects. J Clin Invest 65:256-267, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dodds WJ, Dent J, Hogan WJ, Helm JF, Hauser R, Patel GK, Egide MS: Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in patients with reflux esophagitis. N. Engl J Med 307:1547-1552, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  12. Crookes PF, Hamoui N, Theisen J, Johansson J, Lord RV, Gastal O, Corkill S, DeMeester TR: Response of the lower esophageal sphincter to ingestion of carbonated beverages. Gastroenterology 116:A140, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  13. Liebermann DA: Medical therapy for chronic reflux esophagitis; long-term follow-up. Arch Intern Med 147:1717-1720, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kuster E, Ros D, Toledo-Pimental V, Pujol A, Bordas JM, Grande L, Pera C: Predictive factors of the long term outcome in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: six year follow up of 107 patients. Gut 35:8-14, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  15. Costantini M, Zaninotto G, Anselmino M, Boccu C, Nicoletti L, Ancona E: The role of a defecive lower esophageal sphincter in the clinical outcome of treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Arch Surg 131:659-659, 1996

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Campos, G.M., Oberg, S., Gastal, O. et al. Manometry of the Lower Esophageal Sphincter: Inter- and Intraindividual Variability of Slow Motorized Pull-Through Versus Station Pull-Through Manometry. Dig Dis Sci 48, 1057–1061 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023700309299

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023700309299

Navigation