Abstract
To address a major methodological problem in the body of evidence on distance learning in postsecondary education, we conducted a randomized, true-experiment paired with a quasi-experiment. Community college students randomly assigned to receive instruction at a distance via a two-way interactive telecourse demonstrated learning equivalent to that of students assigned to on-campus, face-to-face instruction. However, students choosing to take the course via telecourse at remote sites had significantly higher course learning than either randomly assigned group. Such evidence suggests that the body of evidence on distance learning could be seriously confounded by learner self-selection.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Barker, B., Frisbie, A., and Patrick, K. (1989). Broadening the definition of education in light of the new telecommunications technologies. Am. J. Distance Educ. 3: 20–29.
Bowen, H. (1977). Investment in Learning, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Burgess, W. (1994). The Oryx Guide to Distance Learning, Oryx Press, Phoenix.
Carpenter, C., and Greenhill, L. (1963). Comparative Research on Methods and Media for Presenting Programmed Courses in Mathematics and English, The Pennsylvania State University, The University Division of Instructional Services and the Departments of Mathematics and English, University Park.
Carter, V. (1996). Do media influence learning? Revisiting the debate in the context of distance education. Open Learn. 11: 31–40.
Clark, R. (1991). When researchers swim upstream: Reflections on an unpopular argument about learning from media. Educ. Technol. 31: 34–38.
Clark, R. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 42: 21–29.
El-Khawas, E. (1995). Campus Trends, 1995, American Council on Education, Washington, DC.
Institute for Higher Education Policy (1999). What's the Difference: A Review of Contemporary Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Learning in Higher Education, Author, Washington, DC.
Jones, J., Simonson, M., Kemis, M., and Sorensen, C. (1992). Distance education: A cost analysis, unpublished manuscript, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.
Lewis, L., Ferris, E., and Alexander, D. (1997). Distance education in higher education institutions (NCES Report, No. 98-062). U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
Machtmes, K., and Asher, J. (2000). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of telecourses in distance education. Am. J. Distance Educ. 14: 27–46.
Merisotis, J., and Phipps, R. (1999). What's the difference? Outcomes of distance vs. traditional classroom-based learning. Change 31: 12–17.
Moore, M., and Thompson, M. (1990). Effects of Distance Learning: A Summary of Literature, The American Center for the Study of Distance Education, University Park, PA.
Moore, M., and Thompson, M. (1997). The Effects of Distance Learning: Revised Edition, The American Center for the Study of Distance Education, University Park, PA.
Olcott, D. (1992). Instructional television: A review of selected evaluation research, unpublished manuscript, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
Pascarella, E., and Terenzini, P. (1991). How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Pedhazur, E. (1982). Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction (2nd Ed.), Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York.
Pittman, V. (1991). Academic credibility on the "image problem": The quality issue in collegiate independent study. In: Watkins, B., and Wright, S. (eds.), The Foundations of American Distance Education: A Century of Collegiate Correspondence Study, Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA, pp. 109–133.
Ritchie, H., and Newby, T. (1989). Classroom lecture/discussion vs. live televised instruction: A comparison of effects on student performance, attitude, and interaction. Am. J. Distance Educ. 3(3): 36–45.
Russell, T. (September 1995). The "No Significant Difference" Phenomenon as Reported in 214 Research Reports, Summaries, and Papers, Office of Instructional Telecommunications, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.
Russell, T. (January 1999). The "No Significant Difference" Phenomenon as Reported in 248 Research Reports, Summaries, and Papers (4th Ed.), Office of Instructional Telecommunications, North Carolina State University, Raleigh.
Schlosser, C., and Anderson, M. (1994). Distance Education: Review of the Literature, Research Institute for Studies in Education, Iowa State University, Ames.
Wetzel, C., Radtke, P., and Stern, H. (1994). Instructional Effectiveness of Video Media, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
Zigerell, J. (1991). The Uses of Television in American Higher Education, Praeger, New York.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Collins, J., Pascarella, E.T. Learning on Campus and Learning at a Distance: A Randomized Instructional Experiment. Research in Higher Education 44, 315–326 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023077731874
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023077731874