Skip to main content
Log in

An Educational Psychologist's Perspective on Cognitive Neuroscience

  • Published:
Educational Psychology Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Byrnes and Fox present a thoughtful article on a neglected but important topic for educational psychologists. Some major contributions are their emphasis on the need for consistency in educational theory and neuroscience research, the lack of automatic correspondence between neuroscience research and educational applications, the need for educator awareness of neuroscience research, the importance of development, and the influence of early education. Limitations of the neuroscience perspective for education include inadequate examination of contemporary theories of learning and motivation, the generality of cognitive processes, the influence of student beliefs, and the role of self-regulation. Suggestions for future research are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1988). Self-regulation of motivation and action through goal systems. In Hamilton, V., Bower, G. H., and Frijda, N. H. (eds.), Cognitive perspectives on emotion and motivation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 37–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Vintage, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes, J. P.,Fox, N. A. (1998). The educational relevance of research in cognitive neuroscience. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 10: 297–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., and MacIver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents' experiences in schools and families. Am. Psychol. 48: 90–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gredler, M. E. (1992). Learning and instruction: Theory into practice (2nd Ed.), Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohn, R. L. (1995). Classroom learning and teaching. Longman, White Plains, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., and Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meece, J. L. (1991). The classroom context and students' motivational goals. In Maehr, M. L., and Pintrich, P. R. (eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 7), JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 261–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormrod, J. E. (1995). Human learning (2nd Ed.), Merrill, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In Ames, C., and Maehr, M. L. (eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 6), JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, pp. 117–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., and Boyle, R. (1993). Beyond “cold” conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Rev. Educ. Res. 63: 167–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., and Schrauben, B. (1992). Students' motivational beliefs and their cognitive engagement in classroom tasks. In Schunk, D. H., and Meece, J. L. (eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 149–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., and Schunk, D. H. (1996). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Merrill, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and achievement behaviors. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 1: 173–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (1990). Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educ. Psychol. 25: 71–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educ. Psychol. 26: 207–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (1996). Learning theories: An educational perspective (2nd Ed.), Merrill, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., and Hanson, A. R. (1985). Peer models: Influence on children's self-efficacy and achievement. J. Educ. Psychol. 77: 313–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H., and Hanson, A. R. (1989). Self-modeling and children's cognitive skill learning. J. Educ. Psychol. 81: 155–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C. E., and Mayer, R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In Wittrock, M. C. (ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd Ed.), Macmillan, New York, pp. 315–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning. J. Educ. Psychol. 81: 329–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In Schunk, D. H., and Zimmerman, B. J. (eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schunk, D.H. An Educational Psychologist's Perspective on Cognitive Neuroscience. Educational Psychology Review 10, 411–417 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022841401896

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022841401896

Navigation