Abstract
This paper considers the problem of missing data in two circumstances commonly confronted by criminologists. In the first circumstance, there is missing data due to subject attrition—some cases drop out of a study. In this context, analysts are frequently interested in examining the association between an independent variable measured at time t(x t ) and an outcome variable that is measured at time t + 1(y t + 1); the problem is that the outcome variable is only observed for those cases which do not drop out of the study. In the second circumstance there is missing data on an independent variable of interest for typical reasons (i.e., the respondent did not wish to answer a question or could not be located). In this case, researchers are interested in estimating the association between the independent variable with missing data and an outcome variable that is fully observed. Criminologists often handle these two missing data problems by conducting analyses on the subsample of observations with complete data. In this paper, we explore this problem with two case studies and we then illustrate the use of methods that directly address the uncertainty produced by missing data.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Agresti, A. (1996). An Introduction to Categorical Data Analysis. Wiley, New York.
Allison, P. D. (2000). Multiple imputation for missing data: a cautionary tale. Sociol. Methods Res. 28: 301-309.
Carroll, R. J., Ruppert, D., and Stefanski, L. A. (1995). Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models. Chapman and Hall, London.
Elliott, D. S., Huizinga, D., and Menard, S. (1989). Multiple Problem Youth: Delinquency, Substance Use, and Mental Health Problems. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Hirschel, J. D., Hutchison, I. W., and Dean, C. W. (1992). The failure of arrest to deter spouse assault. J. Res. Crime Delinq. 29: 7-33.
King, G. (1989). Unifying Political Methodology: the Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference. Cambridge University Press, New York.
King, G., Keohane, R. O., and Verba, S. (1994). Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
Little, R. J. A. (1992). Regression with missing x's: a review. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 87: 1227-1236.
Little, R. J. A. (1995). Modeling the drop-out mechanism in repeated-measures studies. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90: 1112-1121.
Little, R. J. A., and Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. Wiley, New York.
Little, R. J. A., and Schenker, N. (1995). Missing Data. In Arminger, G., Clogg, C. C. and Sobel, M. E. (eds.), Handbook of statistical modeling for the social and behavioral sciences, pp. 39-75. Plenum Press, New York.
Manski, C. F. (1995). Identification Problems in the Social Sciences. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
Nordheim, E. V. (1984). Inference from nonrandomly missing categorical data: An example from a genetic study on Turner's Syndrome. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 79: 772-780.
Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys. Wiley, New York.
Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of Incomplete Multivariate Data. Chapman and Hall, London.
Thompson, M. E. (1997). Theory of Sample Surveys. Chapman and Hall, London.
Vach, W. (1994). Logistic Regression with Missing Values in the Covariates. Lecture notes in statistics, vol. 48. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Wainer, H. (1986). Drawing Inferences from Self-Selected Samples. Springer-Verlag, New York.
Zawitz, M. W., Klaus, P. A., Bachman, R., Bastian, L. D., DeBerry, M. M., Rand, M. R., et al. (1993). Highlights from 20 Years of Surveying Crime Victims: The National Crime Victimization Survey, 1973–1992. Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brame, R., Paternoster, R. Missing Data Problems in Criminological Research: Two Case Studies. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 19, 55–78 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022518712229
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022518712229