Abstract
Parents of 24 children referred to an outpatient psychology clinic (mean child age 10.8, range 6–15) were administered the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version 2.3 (DSIC-2.3) twice in a 1-week test–retest reliability design (mean retesting interval = 7.5 days, range = 6–11 days). An alternative mode of administration of the DISC, based on communication principles, was used, involving (a) a schematic representation of the areas to be covered; (b) definition of a common language for the categories, diagnoses, and criteria; and (c) the respondent being allowed to select the order in which the diagnostic areas were covered. The DISC items and modules were unchanged. Symptom scores derived from the DISC were highly reliable over 1 week (average ICC = .85, range = .67–.95) and showed no attenuation from Time 1 to Time 2. Reliability of DSM diagnoses averaged kappa = .80 (range = .63–1.0). There was no significant attenuation in diagnoses from Time 1 to Time 2. Overall, this alternative way of administering the DISC appears to have promise for reducing attenuation and boosting the reliability—and ultimately the validity—of child psychiatric diagnoses. Further investigations of the mechanisms underlying these effects, and further studies with child and adolescent respondents and nonreferred community samples are recommended.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Angold, A. (1989). Structured assessments of psychopathology in children and adolescents. In C. Thompson (Ed.), The instruments of psychiatric research (pp. 271-304). New York: Wiley.
Blickhard, M. (1980). Cognition, convention, and communication. New York: Praeger.
Boyle, M., Offord, D. R., Racine, Y., Sanford, M., Szatmari, P., Fleming, J. E., & Price-Munn, N. (1993). Evaluation of the Diagnostic Interview for Children and Adolescents for use in general population samples. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 21, 663-681.
Canino, G., Bird, H. R., Rubio-Stipec, M. A., Woodbury, M. A., Ribera, J. C., Huertas, S. E., & Sesman, M. J. (1987). Reliability of child diagnosis in a Hispanic sample. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 26, 560-565.
Chambers, W. J., Puig-Antich, J., Hirsch, M., Paez, P., Ambrosini, P. J., Tabrizi, M. A., & Davies, M. (1985). The assessment of affective disorders in children and adolescents by semistructured interview. Archives of General Psychiatry, 42, 696-702.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
Costello, A. J., Edelbrock, C., Dulcan, M., Kalas, R., & Klaric, S. (1984). Development and testing of the NIMH DISC in a clinical population: Final report. (Contract # RFP-DB-81-0027). Rockville, MD: Center for Epidemiologic Studies, National Institute of Mental Health.
Edelbrock, C., & Costello, A. J. (1988). Structured psychiatric interviews for children. In M. Rutter, A. H. Tuma, & I. Lann (Eds.), Assessment and diagnosis in child psychopathology (pp. 87-112). New York: Guilford Press.
Edelbrock, C., Costello, A. J., Dulcan, M. K., Kalas, R., Klaric, J., & Conover, N. (1985). Age differences in the reliability of the psychiatric interview of the child. Child Development, 56, 265-275.
Fleiss, J. L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Hewes, D. E. (1995). The cognitive basis of interpersonal communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hodges, K., Cools, J., & McKnew, D. (1989). Test-retest reliability of a clinical research interview for children: The Child Assessment Schedule. Psychological Assessment, 1, 317-322.
Hodges, K., & Zeman, J. (1993). Interviewing. In M. Hersen and T. Ollendick (Eds.), Handbook of child and adolescent assessment (pp. 65-81). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Jensen, P., Bird, H., Canino, G., Dulcan, M., Rae, D., Richters, J., Piacentini, J., Goodman, S., Lahey, B., Rubio-Stipec, M., & Schwab-Stone, M. (1993). Attenuation of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC 2.1): Sex, age, and IQ relationships. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 32, 884.
Jensen, P., Roper, M., Fisher, P., Piacentini, J., Canino, G., & Richters, J. (1995). Test-retest reliability of the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC 2.1). Archives of General Psychiatry, 52, 61-71.
Schwab-Stone, M., Fisher, P., Piacentini, J., Shaffer, D., Davies, M., & Briggs, M. (1993). The Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children-Revised (DISC-R): II. Test-retest reliability. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 32, 651-657.
Shaffer, D., Schwab-Stone, M., Fisher P., Davies, M., Piacentini, J., & Gioia, P. (1988). Results of a field trial and proposals for a new instrument (DISC-R) (Final report, grant #MH36971). Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health.
Shouksmith, G. (1978). Assessment through interviewing (2nd ed.). New York: Pergamon Press.
Trenholm, S., & Jensen, A. (1992). Interpersonal communication (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Vaina, L., & Hintikka, J. (1984). Cognitive constraints on communication: Representations and processes. Boston: Reidel.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Edelbrock, C., Crnic, K. & Bohnert, A. Interviewing as Communication: An Alternative Way of Administering the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children. J Abnorm Child Psychol 27, 447–453 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021979925865
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021979925865