Abstract
Far more than a mechanism to voyeuristically delve into the past to satisfy trivial interests, management history can be used to provide insight into contemporary practices and guide us away from repeating past mistakes. Using historiography, this paper offers a glimpse into the nature of the employer–employee relationship, comparing events from the earliest days of industrialization to the present. Set in the historical site of Lowell, Massachusetts, the birthplace of the American Industrial Revolution, this research addresses the progression of events that seem to predictably occur when well-meaning entrepreneurial enterprises face environmental turbulence and subsequently alter their labor philosophy from paternalism to social Darwinism. In the early 1800s, Lowell's textile mills represented a progressive environment. A close-knit, planned community was created which allowed the women opertives to grow socially and intellectually. However, economic downturns resulted in cycles of wage-cutting and cost-saving efforts. Eventually, the women were replaced with immigrants who were willing to tolerate substandard working conditions. By the 1860s, the owners had completely abandoned their concept that corporations should have souls. In history, market forces are continually in flux and often so is management's perception about whether the worker is a valuable asset or an easily discarded econom ic liability. Reactions to this unpredictability are addressed.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Bessen, J. (2000). The skills of the unskilled in the American industrial revolution. jbessen@researchoninnovation.org.
Conlin, M. (February 26, 2001). Labor laws apply to dot-coms? Really? Businessweek Online, 1-3.
Dalzell, R. F.(1987). Enterprising Elite: The Boston Associates and the World They Made. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Dublin, T. (1975). Women, work, and protest in the early Lowell mills: “The oppressing hand of avarice would enslave us. ” Labor History, 16, 99-116.
Dublin, T. (1979). Women at work: The transformation of work and Community in Lowell, Massachusetts, 1826- 1860. New York: Columbia University Press.
Dublin, T. (1992). Lowell: The Story of an Industrial City. Washington, DC: Division of Publications, National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior.
Dunwell, S. (1978). The Run of the Mill. Boston: David R. Godine.
Epstein, E., & Kolste, S. (2000). Dot-coms revamp salary landscape. InfoWorld, 2(26), 108-112.
Filipelli, R. L. (1984). Labor in the USA: A History. New York: Newberry Awards Records.
Fleischman, R. K., & Tyson, T. N. (1997). Developing expertise: Two episodes in early nineteenth century U.S. management accounting history. Business and Economic History, 26(2), 365-380.
Gross, L. F. (1993). The Course of Industrial Decline: The Boott Cotton Mills of Lowell, Massachusetts, 1835- 1955. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Hindle, T. (March 7, 2002). Back to basics. The Economist. www.economist.com/business/index.cfm.
Juravich, T., Hartford, W. F., & Green, J. R. (1996). Commonwealth of Toll: Chapters in the History of Massachusetts Workers and Their Unions. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Lawler, E. E., III. (2002). Pay strategies for the next economy. WorldatWork Journal, 11(1), 6-10.
Lee, J. Y. (1992). Lowell. Revisiting the birth of industry in America. Invention and Technology, 8-16.
Leonhardt, D. (February 16, 2000). Who's the boss? Who's the worker? The New York Times on the Web. http://www.nytimes.com/library/jobmarket/021600work-employment.html.
Lipchitz, J.W. (1976). The golden age. In Eno, A. L., Jr. (Ed.), CottonWas King:AHistory of Lowell, Massachusetts, 82-94. Lowell, MA: Lowell Historical Society.
Lubar, S. (2001). Mill workers. http://chnm.gmu.edu/courses/jackson/mill/people.html.
Mrozowski, S. A., Ziesing, G. H., & Beaudry, M. C. (1996). Living on the Boott: Historical Archaeology at the Boott's Mills Boardinghouses, Lowell, Massachusetts. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Mueller, C.W., Boyer, E. M., Price, J. L., & Iverson, R. D. (1994). Employee attachment and noncoercive conditions of work. Work and Occupations, 21, 179-211.
Read, D. (1997). Recording a hard life with gentle words: Lowell factory women 1835-1850. http://www.bennington.edu/users/students/dotread/millgirls.html.
Robinson, H. H. (1898). Loom and Spindle. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.
Verespej, M. A. (2000). New ruling target temps. Industry Week, 249(14), 14.
Warner, M. (2001). Pity the poor dot-commer (a little bit). Fortune, 143(2), 40.
Zaroulis, N. (1976). Daughters of freemen: The female operatives and the beginning of the labor movement. In Eno, A. L., Jr. (Ed.), Cotton Was King: A History of Lowell, Massachusetts, 105-115. Lowell, MA: Lowell Historical Society.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Birkenmeier, B.J., Carson, K.D. & Carson, P.P. Lessons from Lowell, Massachusetts (1821–62): The Shifting Sands of Managerial Beneficence. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal 14, 121–133 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021183704168
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021183704168