Abstract
Aim: Interobserver variability is an important limitation of the stress echocardiography and depends on the echocardiographer training. Our aim was to evaluate if the use of contrast agents during dipyridamole stress echocardiography would improve the agreement between an experienced and a non-experienced observer in stress echo and therefore if contrast would affect the learning period of dypyridamole stress echo. Methods and results: Two independent observers without knowledge of any patient data interpreted all stress studies. One observer was an experienced one and the other had experience in echocardiography but not in stress echo. Two observers analysed 87 non-selected and consecutive studies. Out of the 87 studies, 46 were performed without contrast administration, whereas i.v. contrast (2.5 g Levovist® by two bolus at rest and at peak stress) was administered in 41. In all cases, second harmonic imaging and stress digitalisation pack was used. The agreement between observers showed a κ index of 0.58 and 0.83 without and with contrast administration, respectively. Conclusions: The use of contrast agents provides a better agreement in the evaluation of stress echo between an experienced and a non-experienced observer in stress echo. Adding routinely contrast agents could probably reduce the number of exams required for the necessary learning curve in stress echocardiography.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Sawada SG, Segar DS, Ryan T, et al. Echocardiographic detection of coronary artery disease during dobutamine infusion. Circulation 1991; 83: 1605–1614.
Marcovitz PA, Armstrong WF. Accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography in detecting coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1992; 69: 1269–1273.
Armstrong WF. Echocardiography in coronary artery disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1988; 30: 267–288.
Hoffmann R, Lethen H, Marwick T, et al. Analysis of interinstitutional observer agreement in interpretation of dobutamine stress echocardiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996; 27: 330–336.
Takeuchi M, Sonoda S, Miura Y, Kuroiwa A. Reproducibility of dobutamine digital stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1997; 10: 344–351.
Beleslin BD, Ostojic M, Stepanovic J, et al. Stress echocardiography in the detection of myocardial ischemia. Circulation 1994; 90: 1168–1176.
Bjornstad K, Al Amri M, Lingamanaicker J, Oquili I, Hatle L. Interobserver and intraobserver variation for analysis of left ventricular wall motion at baseline and during low-and high-dose dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with high prevalence of wall motion abnormalities at rest. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1996; 9: 320–328.
Porter TR, Xie F, Kricsfeld A, Chiou A, Dabestani A. Improved endocardial border resolution during dobutamine stress echocardiography with intravenous sonicated dextrose albumin. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994; 23: 1440–1443.
Voci P, Testa G, Feinstein SB. Enhancement of endocardial border detection by intravenous contrast injection during stress echocardiography. Cardiovascular Imaging 1996; 8: 285–287.
Picano E, Distante A, Masini M, Morales MA, Lattanzi F, L'Abbate A. Dipyridamole echocardiography test in effort angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 1985; 56: 452–456.
American Society of Echocardiography Committee on standards, subcommittee on quantification of two dimensional echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 1989; 2: 358–367.
Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Measurement 1960; 20: 37–46.
Oberman A, Fan PH, Nanda NC, et al. Reproducibility of two-dimensional exercise echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989; 14: 923–928.
Atwood JE, Jensen D, Froelicher V, et al. Agreement in human interpretation of analog thallium myocardial perfusion images. Circulation 1981; 64: 601–609.
Blackburn H. The exercise electrocardiogram: differences in interpretation. Am J Cardiol 1968; 21: 871–880.
Zir LM, Miller SE, Dinsmore RE, Gilbert JP, Harthorne JW. Interobserver variability in coronary angiography. Circulation 1976; 53: 627–632.
Hoffmann R, Lethen H, Marwick T, et al. Standardized guidelines for the interpretation of dobutamine echocardiography reduce interinstitutional variance in interpretation. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 1520–1524.
Marwick T, Willermart B, D'Hondt AM, et al. Selection of the optimal nonexercise stress for the evaluation of ischemic regional myocardial dysfunction and malperfusion. Circulation 1993; 87: 345–354.
Spencer K, Bednarz J, Rafter P, Korcarz C, Lang RM. Use of harmonic imaging without echocardiographic contrast to improve two-dimensional image quality. Am J Cardiol 1998; 82: 794–799.
Zamorano J, Sánchez V, Almería C, Serra S, Rodrigo JL, Sánchez-Harguindey L. The use of contrast agents in dobutamine stress echocardiography and its influence on interobserver variability. Rev Esp Cardiol 2000; 53: 1342–1346.
Picano E, Lattanzi F, Orlandini A, Marini C, L'Abbate A. Stress echocardiography and the human factor: the importance of being expert. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17: 666–669.
Franke A, Hoffmann R, Kühl HP, et al. Non-contrast second harmonic imaging improves interobserver agreement and accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with impaired image quality. Heart 2000; 83: 133–140.
Varga A, Picano E, Dodi C, Barbieri A, Pratali L, Gaddi O. Madness and method in stress echo reading. Eur Heart J 1999; 20: 1271–1275.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zamorano, J., Sánchez, V., Moreno, R. et al. Contrast agents provide a faster learning curve in dipyridamole stress echocardiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 18, 415–419 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021162729742
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021162729742