Abstract
This paper establishes a theoretical basis for the implementation of governance systems in Occupational Health and Safety (OHS). This arose when a complex government organization reviewed the usage of its OHS computer system. This review precipitated several cycles of Action Research (AR). The AR allowed the recognition that the organization needed to define its OHS strategy, clarify its commitment to OHS, and examine its OHS systems in order to provide an effective OHS management and corporate governance system. As part of the review, a Viable Systems Diagnosis was done on the OHS function. It was recognized that Stafford Beer provided valuable insights into the information needs and communication flows of OHS information throughout this complex organization. Action research appears to be a particularly useful method for examining and implementing OHS management systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Argyris, C. (1982). The executive mind and double-loop learning. Organ. Dyn. 11(2), 5-22.
Australia, S. (1997). AS/NZS 4804:1997 Occupational Health and Safety Management Systems-General Guidelines on Principles, Systems and Supporting Techniques, Standards, Australia.
Beer, S. (1975). Platform for Change, Chichester, NY, Wiley.
Beer, S. (1979). The Heart of Enterprise, Chichester, NY, Wiley.
Beer, S. (1981). Brain of the Firm, 2nd edn., Chichester, NY, Wiley.
Beer, S. (1985). Diagnosing the System for Organizations, Oxford, University Press.
Carver, J. (1997a). Designing Policies that Make a Difference. Boards That Make a Difference: A New Design for Leadership in Nonprofit and Public Organizations, Jossey, Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 36-49.
Carver, J. (1997b). A New Vision for Governing Boards. Boards that Make a Difference: A New Design for Leadership in Nonprofit and Public Organizations, Jossey, Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp. 1-20.
Checkland, P. (1999). Soft Systems Methodology: A 30 year Retrospective. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice Includes a 30-Year Retrospctive, Wiley, Chichester, NY, pp. A3-A66.
Espejo, R., Schuhmann, W., Schwaninger, M., and Bilello, U. (1996). Organizational Transformation and Learning: A Cybernetic Approach to Management, Wiley, Chichester, NY.
Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (1991). Creative Problem Solving: Total System Intervention, Wiley, Chichester, NY.
Kaplan, R. S., and Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.
OECD, A. H. T. F. o. C. G. (1999). OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, OECD, Paris, pp. 1-25.
Reason, P., and Bradbury, H. (2001). Preface. Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, Sage, London, pp. xxiii-xxxi.
Sarah, R., Haslett, T., Molineaux, J., Olsen, J., Stephens, J., Tepe, S., and Walker, B. (2002). Business action research in practice-A strategic conversation about conducting action research in business organisations. Syst. Pract. Action. Res. 15(6), pp. 535-546.
Schein, E. (2001). Clinical Inquiry/Research, Chapter 21, In Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, Sage, London, p. 233.
Schwaninger, M. (2001). Intelligent organizations: An integrative framework. Syst. Res. 18, 137-158.
Vidgen, R. (1998). Cybernetics and business processes: Using the Viable System Model to develop an enterprise process architecture. Knowledge Process Manage. 5(2), 118-131.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tepe, S., Haslett, T. Occupational Health and Safety Systems, Corporate Governance and Viable Systems Diagnosis: An Action Research Approach. Systemic Practice and Action Research 15, 509–522 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021064704360
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021064704360