Abstract
Drought and salinity are the major abiotic factors limiting productivityin rice (Oryza sativa L.). Although both generate osmoticstress, ion toxicity is an additional and important component of salinity. Tostudy the morphological and anatomical responses to those types of stress, weused in vitro grown rice seedlings. Based on an initialscreening of several non-penetrating osmotica on seedling growth, we selectedsorbitol to compare its osmotic effects during seedling development with thosegenerated by NaCl stress. At comparable levels of osmolality, the reduction inroot and leaf growth as well as their delayed development were similar for bothsaline- and osmotically-generated stress. Some changes observed in root anatomyand most of the variations in leaf anatomy features caused by the treatmentscould be ascribed to osmotic stress. However, there were evident differences inthe morphology of the root system as well as in chlorophyll levels as afunctionof the stress treatment. Furthermore, the larger size of epidermal andbulliformcells was distinctively related to saline stress. The results obtained providetools for the in vitro identification of either specificorcross-tolerant phenotypes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bal A.R. and Chaffopadhyay N.C. 1987. Effects of salts singly or in combination on germination and seedling growth of rice. Agrochemica. 31: 226–233.
Bray E.A. 2000. Responses to abiotic stresses. In: Buchanan B., Gruissem W. and Jones R. (eds), Biochemistry &; Molecular Biology of Plants. ASPP, Rockville, pp. 1158–1203.
Bressan R.A., Nelson D.E., Iraki N.M., Larosa P.C., Singh N.K., Hasegawa P.M. et al. 1990. Reduced cell expansion and changes in cell walls of plant cells adapted to NaCl. In: Katterman F. (ed.), Environmental Injury to Plants. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 137–171.
Ekanayoke I.J., O'Toole J.C., Garrity D.P. and Masajo T.M. 1985. Inheritance of root characters and their relations to drought resistance in rice. Crop. Sci. 25: 927–933.
Flowers T.J. and Yeo A.R. 1981. Variation in the resistance of sodium chloride salinity within rice varieties. New Phytol. 88: 363–373.
Flowers T.J., Duque E., Hajibagheri M.A., McGonigle T.P. and Yeo A.R. 1985. The effect of salinity on leaf ultrastructure and net photosynthesis of two varieties of rice: further evidence for a cellular component of salt-resistance. New Phytol. 100: 37–43.
Garcia A.B., Engler J.D.-A., Iyer S., Gerats T., Van Montagu M. and Caplan A.B. 1997. Effects of osmoprotectants upon NaCl stress in rice. Plant Physiol. 115: 159–169.
Hampson C.R. and Simpson G.M. 1990. Effects of temperature, salt and osmotic potential on early growth of wheat Triticum aestivum. I. Germination. Can. J. Bot.68: 524–528.
Hanson A.D., Peacock W.J., Evans L.T., Artzen C.J. and Khush G.S. 1990. Drought resistance in rice. Nature 345: 26–27.
Heenan D.P., Lewin L.G. and McCaffery D.W. 1988. Salinity tolerance in rice varieties at different growth stages. Aust. J. Exp. Agri. 28: 343–349.
Hsiao T.C. 1973. Plant responses to water stress. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 24: 519–570.
Ingram J. and Barteis D. 1996. The molecular basis of dehydration tolerance in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol., Plant. Mol. Biol. 47: 377–403.
Koyarna M.L., Levesley A., Koebner R.M.D., Flowers T.J. and Yeo A.R. 2001. Quantitative trait loci for component physiological traits determining salt tolerance in rice. Plant Physiol. 125: 406–422.
Lutts S., Kinet J.M. and Bouharmont J. 1995. Changes in plant response to NaCl during development of rice Oryza sativa L. varieties differing in salinity resistance. J. Exp. Bot. 46: 1843–1852.
Lutts S., Kinet J.M. and Bouharmont J. 1996. Effect of salt stress on growth, mineral nutrition and proline accumulation in relation to osmotic adjustment in rice Oryza sativa L. cultivars differing in salinity resistance. Plant Growth Regul. 19: 207–218.
Mateu-Andres I. 1991. Leaf anatomy of plants from coastal mediterranean salt-marshes. Monocotyledons. Candollea. 46: 345–358.
Moukadiri O., Deming J., O'Connor J.E. and Cornejo M.J. 1999. Phenotypic characterization of the progenies of rice plants derived from cryopreserved calli. Plant Cell. Rep. 18: 625–632.
Munns R. 1993. Physiological processes limiting plant growth in saline soils: some dogmas and hypotheses. Plant Cell. Environ. 16: 15–24.
Murashige T. and Skoog F. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant 15: 473–497.
Pearson G.A. and Bernstein L. 1959. Salinity effects at several growth stages of rice. Agron. J. 51: 654–657.
Shannon M.C., Grieve C.M. and Francois L.E. 1994. Whole-plant response to salinity. In: Wilkinson R.E. (ed.), Plant-Environment Interactions. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 199–244.
Tardieu F., Reymond M., Hamard P., Granier C. and Muller B. 2000. Spatial distribution of expansion rate, cell division rate and cell size in maize leaves: a synthesis of the effects of soil water status, evaporative demand and temperature. J. Exp. Bot. 51: 1505–1514.
Thompson D.S., Wilkinsons S., Bacon M.A. and Davies W.J. 1997. Multiple signals and mechanisms that regulate leaf growth and stomatal behaviour during water deficit. Physiol. Plant 100: 303–313.
Toenniessen G.H. 1991. Potentially useful genes for rice genetic engineering. In: Khush G.S. and Toenniessen G.H. (eds), Rice biotechnology. CAB international, Wallingford, pp. 253–280.
Winicov I. 1998. New molecular approaches to improving salt tolerance in crop plants. Ann. Bot. 82: 703–710.
Wu Y., Sharp R.E., Durachko D.M. and Cosgrove D.J. 1996. Growth maintenance of the maize primary root at low water potentials involves increases in cell-wall extension properties, expansin activity and wall susceptibility to expansins. Plant Physiol. 111: 765–772.
Yano M. and Sasaki T. 1997. Genetic and molecular dissection of quantitative traits in rice. In: Sasaki T. and Moore G. (eds), Oryza: From Molecule to Plant. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 145–153.
Yeo A. 1998. Molecular biology of salt tolerance in the context of whole-plant physiology. J. Exp. Bot. 49: 915–929.
Yoshida S. and Hasegawa S. 1982. The rice root system, its development and function. In: Drought Resistance in Crops with Emphasis on Ice. International Rice Research Institute, Manila, pp. 97–114.
Yu L.X., Ray J.D., O'Toole J.C. and Nguyen H.T. 1995. Use of wax-petrolatum layers for screening rice root penetration. Crop. Sci. 35: 684–687.
Zhang J., Nguyen H.T. and Blum A. 1999. Genetic analysis of osmotic adjustment in crop plants. J. Exp. Bot. 50: 291–302.
Zheng H.-G., Babu R.C., Pathan M.S., Ah L., Huang N., Courtois B. et al. 2000. Quantitative trait loci for root-penetration ability and root thickness in rice: comparison of genetic backgrounds. Genome 43: 53–61.
Ziegler R. and Egle K. 1965. Zur quantitativen Analyse der Chloroplastenpigmente 1. Kritische Überprüfung der spektralphotometrischen Chlorophyllbestimmung. Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen. 41: 11–63.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bahaji, A., Mateu, I., Sanz, A. et al. Common and distinctive responses of rice seedlings to saline- and osmotically-generated stress. Plant Growth Regulation 38, 83–94 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020979621681
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020979621681