Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Guest Introduction: The Changing Shape of Computer Vision in the Twenty-First Century

  • Introduction
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Vision Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bergen, J.R., Anandan, P., Hanna, K.J., and Hingorani, R. 1992. Hierarchical model-based motion estimation. In Proceedings European Conference on Computer Vision, Berlin, Germany, vol. 588, Springer, pp. 237–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M.J., Yacoob, Y., and Ju, S.X. 1997. Recognizing human motion using parametrized models of optical flow. In Motion-Based Recognition, M. Shah and R. Jain (Eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, pp. 245–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannata, R.W., Shah, M., Blask, S.G., and Van Workum, J.A. 2000. Autonomous video registration using sensor model parameter adjustments. Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR) 2000, Cosmos Club, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canny, J.F. 1986. A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE PAMI, 8:769–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cédras, C. and Shah, M. 1995. Motion based recognition: A survey. Image and Vision Computing, 13(2):129–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. and William, L. 1993. View interpolation for image synthesis. In Proc. SIGGRAPH'93, pp. 279–288.

  • Essa, I. and Pentland, A. 1997. Facial expression recognition using motion. In Motion-Based Recognition, M. Shah and R. Jain (Eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, pp. 271–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faugeras, O. and Robert, L. 1994. What can two images tell us about a third one? In Proc. ECCV, pp. 485–492.

  • Flickner, M. and Sawhney, H. et al. 1997. Query by image and video content: The QBIC system. Intelligent Multimedia Information Retrieval, M. Maybury (Ed.). MIT Press, pp. 7–22.

  • Grimson, W.E.L., Lozano-Perez, T., Wells III, W.M., Ettinger, G.J., White, S.J., and Kikinis, R. 1996. An automatic regis-tration method for frameless stereotaxy, image guided surgery, and enhanced reality visualization. In Transactions on Medical Imaging.

  • Hampapur, A., Gupta, A., Horowitz, B., Shu, C.F., Fuller, C., Bach, J.R., Gorkani, M., and Jain, R.C. 1997. Virage video engine. In Proc. SPIE, vol. 3022, Storage and Retrieval for Image and Video Databases, pp. 188–198.

  • Horn, B.K.P. 1973. The Binford-Horn line finder. MIT AI Memo 285, MIT.

  • Javed, O. and Shah M. 2002. Tracking and object classification for automated surveillance. In European Conference on Computer Vision, Copenhagen, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, S. and Shah, M. 2001. Object based segmentation of video using color, motion and spatial information. IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, CVPR 2001, Kauai, Hawaii.

  • Koller, D., Heinze, D., and Nagel, H-H. 1991. Algorithmic characterization of vehicle trajectories from image sequences by motion verbs. CVPR-91, pp. 90–95.

  • Mann, S. and Picard, R.W. 1997. Video orbits of projective groups. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 6(9).

  • Manning, R. and Dyer, C. 1999. Interpolating view and scene motion by dynamic view morphing. In Proc. CVPR, pp. 388–394.

  • Marr, D. 1982. Vision. Freeman.

  • Marr, D. and Hildreth, E. 1980. Theory of edge detection. In Proc. R. Soc. Lond., vol. B-207, pp. 187–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr, D. and Poggio, T. 1979. A theory of human stereo vision. In Proc. Roy. Soc. London, vol. B 204, pp. 301–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohta, Y. and Kanade, T. 1985. Stereo by intra-and inter-scanline search using dynamic programming. T-PAMI, (7), 139–154.

  • Rangarajan, K. and Shah, M. 1991. Establishing motion correspondence. CVGIP: Image Understanding, pp. 56–73.

  • Rosenfeld, A., Thurston, M., and Lee, YH. 1972. Edge and curve detection: Further experiments, TC, 21(7):677–715.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seitz, S. and Dyer, C. 1996. View morphing. In Proc. SIGGRAPH'96, pp. 21–30.

  • Tsotsos, J.K. et al. 1980. AFramework for visual motion understanding. IEEE PAMI, 2(6):563–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wexler, Y. and Shashua, A. 2000. On the synthesis of dynamic scenes from reference views. In Proc. CVPR.

  • Witkin, A. and Tenenbaum, M. 1986. On perceptual organization. In From Pixels to Predicates, A. Pentland (Ed.). pp. 149–169.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Computer Vision Lab, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, 32816, USA

    Mubarak Shah

Authors
  1. Mubarak Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shah, M. Guest Introduction: The Changing Shape of Computer Vision in the Twenty-First Century. International Journal of Computer Vision 50, 103–110 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020323930790

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020323930790

Search

Navigation