Skip to main content
Log in

Wheat yield functions for analysis of land-use change in China

  • Published:
Environmental Modeling & Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

CERES-Wheat, a dynamic process crop growth model, is specified and validated for eight sites in the major wheat-growing regions of China. Crop model results are then used to test the Mitscherlich-Baule and the quadratic functional forms for yield response to nitrogen fertilizer, irrigation water, temperature, and precipitation. The resulting functions are designed to be used in a linked biophysical-economic model of land-use and land-cover change in China. While both functions predict yield responses adequately, the Mitscherlich-Baule function is preferable to the quadratic function because its parameters are biologically and physically realistic. Variables explaining a significant proportion of simulated yield variance are nitrogen, irrigation water, and precipitation; temperature was a less significant component of yield variation within the range of observed year-to-year variability at the study sites. Crop model simulations with a generic soil with median characteristics of the eight sites compared to simulations with site-specific soils showed that agricultural soils in China have similar and, in general, low-to-moderate water-holding capacities and organic matter contents. The validated crop model is useful for simulating the range of conditions under which wheat is grown in China, and provides the means to estimate production functions when experimental field data are not available.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. Ackello-Ogutu, Q. Paris and W.A. Williams, Testing a von Liebig crop response function against polynomial specifications, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67 (1985) 873–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. W. Baier, Crop-weather analysis model: Review and model development, Journal of Applied Meterorology 12 (1973) 937–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. FAS, Foreign Agricultural Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (1997).

  4. G. Fischer, Y. Ermoliev, M.A. Keyzer and C. Rosenzweig, Simulating the socio-economic and biogeophysical driving forces of land-use and land-cover change: The IIASA land-use change model, IIASA Working Paper WP–96–010 (1996).

  5. G. Fischer and G.K. Heilig, Population momentum and the demand on land and water resources, Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London B 352 (1997) 869–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (1999); http://apps.fao.org.

  7. M.D. Frank, B.R. Beattie and M.F. Embleton, A comparison of alternative crop response models, American Journal of Agricultural Economics 72 (1990) 597–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D.C. Godwin and C.A. Jones, Nitrogen dynamics in soil-plant systems, in: Modeling Plant and Soil Systems, Agronomy Series No. 31, eds. J. Hanks and J.T. Ritchie (American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, 1991) pp. 287–321.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. Godwin, J. Ritchie, U. Singh and L. Hunt, A Users Guide to CERES Wheat, Version 2.10 (International Fertilizer Development Center, Muscle Shoals, AL, 1990) p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  10. S.S. Grimm, Q. Paris and W.A. Williams, A von Liebig model for water and nitrogen crop response, Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 12 (1987) 182–192.

    Google Scholar 

  11. IIASA, Iiasa.ac.at/Research/LUC/GIS/giswebpage (18 May 1998).

  12. Z. Jin, D. Ge, H. Chen and J. Fang, Effects of climate change on rice production and strategies for adaptation in southern China, in: Climate Change and Agriculture: Analysis of Potential International Impacts, Special Publication No. 59, eds. C. Rosenzweig, L.H. Allen, Jr., L.A. Harper, S.E. Hollinger and J.W. Jones (American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, 1995) pp. 307–323.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M.A. Keyzer, Formulation and spatial aggregation of agricultural production relationships within the Land Use Change (LUC) model, IR–98–092, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  14. G.J. Kovacs, T. Nemeth and J.T. Ritchie, Testing simulation models for the assessment of crop production and nitrate leaching in Hungary, Agricultural Systems 49 (1995) 385–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. R.V. Llewelyn and A.M. Featherstone, A comparison of crop production functions using simulated data for irrigated corn in western Kansas, Agricultural Systems (1997).

  16. J. Ramirez, C.M. Sakamoto and R.E. Jensen, Wheat, in: Impacts of Climate Change on the Biosphere, CIAP Monograph No. 5, Part 2. Climatic Effects (1975) pp. 4–37–4–90.

  17. C.W. Richardson and D.A. Wright, WGEN: A Model for Generating Daily Weather Variables, ARS-8 (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, DC, 1984) p. 83.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J.T. Ritchie, A user-orientated model of the soil water balance in wheat, in: Wheat Growth and Modelling, eds. W. Day and R.K. Atkin (Plenum, New York, 1985) pp. 293–306.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J.T. Ritchie, D.C. Godwin and S. Otter-Nacke, CERES-Wheat. A Simulation Model of Wheat Growth and Development (Texas A&M University Press, College Station, TX, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.T. Ritchie and S. Otter, Description and performance of CERES-Wheat: A user-oriented wheat yield model, in: ARS Wheat Yield Project, ARS-38, ed. W.O. Willis (U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Washington, DC, 1985) pp. 159–175.

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. Rosenzweig and D. Hillel, Climate Change and the Global Harvest: Potential Impacts of the Greenhouse Effect on Agriculture (Oxford University Press, New York, 1998) p. 336.

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. Rosenzweig and A. Iglesias, The use of crop models for international climate change impact assessment, in: Understanding Options for Agricultural Production, eds. G.Y. Tsuji, G. Hoogenboom and P.K. Thornton (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1998) pp. 267–292.

    Google Scholar 

  23. S.M. Scheierling, G.E. Cardon and R.A. Young, Impact of irrigation timing on simulated water-crop production functions, Irrigation Science 18 (1997) 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. M.A. Semenov, J. Wolf, L.G. Evans, H. Ackersten and A. Iglesias, Comparison of wheat simulation models under climate change, Climate Research 7 (1996) 271–181.

    Google Scholar 

  25. L.M. Thompson, Weather and technology in the production of wheat in the United States, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 24 (1969) 219–224.

    Google Scholar 

  26. P.E. Waggoner, Agriculture and a climate changed by more carbon dioxide, in: Changing Climate (National Academy of Sciences Press, Washington, DC, 1983) pp. 383–418.

    Google Scholar 

  27. J.R. Williams, P.T. Dyke and C.A. Jones, EPIC — A model for assessing the effects of erosion on soil productivity, in: Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. on State-of-the-Art in Ecological Modelling, eds. W.K. Lavenroth et al., Fort Collins, CO, 24–28 May 1982 (Elsevier, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rosenzweig, C., Iglesias, A., Fischer, G. et al. Wheat yield functions for analysis of land-use change in China. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 4, 115–132 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019008116251

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019008116251

Navigation