Skip to main content
Log in

Gender Stereotypes of Leaders: An Analysis of the Contents of Obituaries from 1974 to 1998

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study investigates changes in gender stereotypes by an unobtrusive method. Obituaries of deceased women and men in leading positions as published in four German language newspapers between 1974 and 1998 were analyzed. Following a previous study (E. Kirchler, 1992), terms used in the obituaries to describe former leaders were classified into 58 categories. Frequencies of descriptions were analyzed with regard to leadership success, stability of attributes, and person-orientation versus task-orientation. Results show that gender images were dissimilar in content each of the years. In 1992 and 1998, however, female and male stereotypes became more similar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Adler, N. (2000). An international perspective on the barriers to the advancement of women managers. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 42, 289-300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashmore, R.D., DelBoca, F. K., & Wohlers, A. J. (1986). Gender stereotypes. In R. D. Ashmore & F. K. DelBoca (Eds.), The social psychology of female-male relations: A critical analysis of central concepts (pp. 69-119). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banaji, M., & Greenwald, A. G. (1995). Implicit gender stereotyping in judgements of fame. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 181-198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartol, K. M., & Butterfield, D. A. (1976). Sex effects in evaluating leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 446-454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass & Stogdill's handbook of leadership: Theory research and applications (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R., & Mouton, J. (1964). The managerial grid. Houston, TX: Gulf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brody, L. R. (1997). Gender and emotion: Beyond stereotypes. Journal of Social Issues, 53, 369-394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, C. (1992). Merit and gender: Organizations and the mobilization of masculine bias. In A. J. Mills & P. Tancred (Eds.), Gendering organizational analysis (pp. 185-200). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, D. A., & Grinell, J. P. (1999). “Re-viewing” gender, leadership, and managerial behavior: Do three decades of research tell us anything? In G. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 223-238). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder, B. J. (1977). An attribution theory of leadership. In B. M. Staw & G. R. Salanik (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior. Chicago: St. Clair.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carli, L. L., & Eagly, A. H. (1999). Gender effects on social influence and emergent leadership. In G. Powell (Ed.), Handbook of gender and work (pp. 203-280). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cejka, M. A., & Eagly, A. H. (1999). Gender stereotypic images of occupations correspond to the sex segregation of employment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 413-423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, M., & Burke, R. (2000). Women in management: Current research issues. In M. J. Davidson & R. J. Burke (Eds.), Women in management (Vol. 2, pp. 1-7). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories. Analysis of a decade's research on gender. American Psychologist, 39, 105-116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaux, K. (1993). Gender stereotypes. In F. L. Denmark & M. Paludi (Eds.), Psychology of women (pp. 126-139). London: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (1999). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 1171-1188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233-256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (1991). Gender and the emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 685-710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (in press). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review.

  • Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fondas, N. (1997). Feminization unveiled: Management qualities in contemporary writings. Academy of Management Review, 22, 257-282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardinger, M., & Tiggermann, M. (1999). Gender differences in leadership style, job stress and mental health in male-and female-dominated industries. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 301-315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenacre, M. (1993). Correspondence analysis in practice. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., & Martell, R. F. (1995). Sex stereotypes: Do they influence perceptions of managers? Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 237-252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, T. (1982). Women and men as leaders. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchler, E. (1992). Adorable woman, expert man: Changing gender images of women and men in management. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 363-373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchler, E. (1997). The unequal equality: Social stereotypes about female and male entrepreneurs. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 2, 63-77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchler, E., Wagner, J., & Buchleitner, S. (1996). Der langsameWechsel auf Führungsetagen-Meinungen überFrauen undMänner alsFührungspersonen. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 27, 148-166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, A. M., Ritchie, J. E., Jr., Lieb, P.,& Corrigall, E. (2000). Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 593-641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laugheed, J. (2000). Attitudes toward women leaders analyzed by gender and occupation (1984-1998). Advancing Women in Leadership Journal, 1, 1-6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R. G. (1985). An informational processing approach to social perception, leadership perceptions and behavioral measurement in organizational settings. In L. L. Cummings & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 87-128). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinko, M. J., & Gardner, W. L. (1987). The leader/member attribution process. Academy of Management Review, 12, 235-249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, T. R. (1995). Führungstheorien-Attributionstheorie. In A. Kieser, G. Reber, & R. Wunderer (Eds.), Handwörterbuch der Führung 2 (pp. 847-861). Stuttgart: Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieva, V. F., & Gutek, B. A. (1980). Sex effects on evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 5, 267-276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. N., & Butterfield, D. A. (1989). The “good manager”: Did androgyny fare better in the 1980s? Group and Organization Studies, 14, 395-403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimm, S. (1998). The cultural underachievement of females. In G. Davis & S. Rimm (Eds.), Education of the gifted (pp. 308-341). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, S. (1998). Organizational behavior (8th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2001). Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 743-762.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, V. (2001). A global look at psychological barriers to women's progress in management. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 675-688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinkenburg, C. J., Jansen, P. G. W., & Koopman, P. L. (2000). Differences in managerial behaviour and effectiveness. In M. J. Davidson & R. J. Burke (Eds.), Women in management (pp. 120-137). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinert, A. B. (1998). Organisationspsychologie (4th ed.). Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Erich Kirchler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodler, C., Kirchler, E. & Hölzl, E. Gender Stereotypes of Leaders: An Analysis of the Contents of Obituaries from 1974 to 1998. Sex Roles 45, 827–843 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015644520770

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015644520770

Navigation