Abstract
This paper reviews findings from two studies that support the contentions of the Generic Model of Psychotherapy that therapeutic outcome must be viewed as arising from a complex interaction of common and specific factors. Patient, therapy, and relationship factors are shown to selectively add to the variance predicted in psychotherapy outcome studies. Moreover, an inspection of procedures that are common to two different therapies, and those that are unique to these approaches reveal that both contribute to outcome and do so in ways that suggest the presence of both synergistic and inhibiting effects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Ahn, H. & Wampold, B. E. (2001). Where o where are the specific ingredients? A meta-analysis of component studies in counseling and psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology 48, 251–257.
Andrews, H. B. (2000). The myth of the scientist-practitioner: A reply to R. King (1998) and N. King and Ollendick (1998). Australian Psychologist, 35, 60–63.
Beutler, L. E., & Clarkin, J. (1990). Systematic treatment selection: Toward targeted therapeutic interventions. New York: Brunner/Mazel.
Beutler, L. E., Clarkin, J. F., & Bongar, B. (2000). Guidelines for the systematic treatment of the depressed patient. New York: Oxford University Press.
Beutler, L.E., Moleiro, C., Malik, M., & Harwood, T. M. (2000, June). The UC Santa Barbara Study of fitting therapy to patients: First results. A paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Psychotherapy Research (international), Chicago, Ill.
Chambless, D. L., & Hollon, S. D. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 7–18.
Chambless, D. L., & Ollendick, T. H. (2001). Empirically supported psychological interventions: Controversies and evidence. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 85–716.
DeRubeis, R. J.& Crits-Christoph, P. (1998). Empirically supported individual and group psychological treatments for adult mental disorders. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 37–52.
Harwood, T. M., Beutler, L. E., Castillo, S., & Karno, M. (in press). Common and Specific Effects of Couples Treatment for Alcoholism: A test of the Generic Model of Psychotherapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology.
Horvath, A. O., & Symonds, B. D. (1991). Relation between working alliance and outcome in psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 139–149.
Jones, E. E., Cummings, J. D., & Horowitz, M. J. (1988). Another look at the nonspecific hypothesis of therapeutic effectiveness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 48–55.
Karno, M., Beutler, L. E., & Harwood, T. M. (in press). Interactions between psychotherapy process and patient attributes that predict alcohol treatment effectiveness: A preliminary report. Addictive Behaviors.
Lambert, M. J. (1992). Psychotherapy outcome research: Implications for integrative and eclectic therapists. In J. C. Norcross and M. R. Goldfried (Eds), Handbook of Psychotherapy Integration (pp. 94–129). New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Luborsky, L., Rosenthal, R., Diguer, L., Andrusyna, T. P., Berman, J. S., Levitt, J. T., Seligman, D. A., & Krause, E. D. (in press). The dodo bird verdict is alive and well mostly. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice.
Martin, D. J., Garske, J. P., & Davis, M. K. (2000). Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 438–450.
Nathan, P. E., & Gorman, J. M. (Eds.). (1998). A guide to treatments that work. New York: Oxford University Press.
Orlinsky, D. E., & Howard, K. I. (1987). A generic model of psychotherapy. Journal of Integrative and Eclectic Psychology, 6, 6–27.
Patterson, K. (1994). The determination of distinctions and commonalities between two manualized treatments for alcoholism. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
Roth, A., & Fonagy, P. (1996). What works for whom? A critical review of psychotherapy research. New York: Guilford Press.
Rounsaville, B. J., Chevron, E. S., Prusoff, B. A., Elkin, I., Imber, S., Sotsky, S., & Watkins, J. (1987). The relation between specific and general dimensions of the psychotherapy process in interpersonal psychotherapy of depression. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 55, 379–384.
Shapiro, D.A., & Shapiro, D. (1982). Meta-analysis of comparative therapy outcome studies: A replication and refinement. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 581–604.
Smith, M. L., Glass, G. V., & Miller, T. 1. (1980). The benefits of psychotherapy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Stevens, S.E., Hynan, M.T., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of common factor and specific treatment effects across the outcome domains of the phase model of psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology: Science & Practice, 70), 273–290.
Wampold, B. E. (2001). The Great Psychotherapy Debate: Models, Methods, and Findings. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Beutler, L.E., Harwood, T.M. What Is and Can Be Attributed to the Therapeutic Relationship?. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy 32, 25–33 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015579111666
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015579111666