Skip to main content
Log in

“Will This Record Work for Us?”: Managing Music Formats in Commercial Radio

  • Published:
Qualitative Sociology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How do radio stations decide what music to play on the air? Previous studies offer a single answer to this question. In contrast, this study examines the variety of ways that radio programmers answer this question by conceptualizing them as mediators between record companies and radio audiences. From interviews with programmers at commercial radio stations in the United States we identify key programming practices that programmers use to manage their stations' music formats and present a typology of repertoires of such practices. We then discuss the implications of each programming repertoire for stations' music formats and the structural conditions that promote the use of each programming repertoire. In conclusion, we consider the study's implications for understanding culture production in the commercial radio industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Ahlkvist, J. (2001). Programming philosophies and the rationalization of music radio. Media, Culture and Society, 23, 339-358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlkvist, J., & Fisher, G. (2000). And the hits just keep on coming: Music programming standardization in commercial radio. Poetics, 27, 301-325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, W. (1999). Voiceover: The making of Black radio. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, S. (1989). On the radio: Music radio in Britain. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, K. (1988). Top 40 radio: A fragment of the imagination. In S. Frith (Ed.), Facing the music (pp. 8-50). New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. (1982). Art worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berland, J. (1990). Radio space and industrial time: Music formats, local narratives and technological mediation. Popular Music, 9, 179-192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berland, J. (1993). Radio space and industrial time: The case of music formats. In T. Bennett, S. Frith, L. Grossberg, J. Shepard, & G. Turner (Eds.), Rock and popular music: Politics, policies, institutions (pp. 104-118). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, S. T., & Waldfogel, J. (1999). Mergers, station entry, and programming variety in radio broadcasting. Working paper 7080. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielby, W. T., & Bielby, D. D. (1994). All hits are flukes: Institutional decision making and the rhetoric of network prime-time program development. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 1287-1313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bystryn, M. (1978). Art galleries as gatekeepers: The case of the abstract expressionists. Social Research, 45, 390-408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayman, S. E., & Reisner, A. (1998). Gatekeeping in action: Editorial conferences and assessments of newsworthiness. American Sociological Review, 63, 178-199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. A., Kadushin, C., & Powell, W. W. (1982). Books: The culture and commerce of publishing. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denisoff, R. S. (1986). Tarnished gold: The record industry revisited. New Brunswick, CT: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairchild, C. (1999). Deterritorializing radio: Deregulation and the continuing triumph of the corporatist perspective in the USA. Media, Culture and Society, 21, 549-561.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finney, H. C. (1993). Mediating claims to artistry: Social stratification in a local visual arts community. Sociological Forum, 8, 403-431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, R. A., & Podolny, J. (1992). Differentiation of boundary spanning roles: Labor negotiations and implications for role conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 28-47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, S. (1981). Sound effects: Youth, leisure, and the politics of rock 'n' roll. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frith, S. (1996). Performing rites: On the value of popular music. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, S. (1987). Coordination and convention: The organization of the concert world. Symbolic Interaction, 10, 209-27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, S. (1988). Schools of activity and innovation. Sociological Quarterly, 29, 203-219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, R. V., & Fernandez, R. M. (1989). Structures of mediation: A formal approach to brokerage in transaction networks. In C. C. Clogg (Ed.), Sociological Methodology, 19 (pp. 89-126). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfeld, L. (1988). Professional ideologies and patterns of “gatekeeping”: Evaluation and judgment within two art worlds. Social Forces, 66, 903-925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenier, L. (1990). Radio broadcasting in Canada: The case of “transformat” music. Popular Music, 9, 221-233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greve, H. R. (1996). Patterns of competition: The diffusion of a market position in radio broadcasting. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 29-60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennion, A. (1989). An intermediary between production and consumption: The producer of popular music. Science, Technology, and Human Values, 14, 400-424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennion, A. (1990). The production of success: An antimusicology of the pop song. In A. Goodwin and S. Frith (Eds.), On record (pp. 185-206). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennion, A., & Meadel, C. (1986). Programming music: Radio as mediator. Media, Culture and Society, 8, 281-303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. (1999). Radio activity. In K. B. Massey (Ed.), Readings in mass communication: Media literacy and culture (pp. 108-114). Mountainview, CA: Mayfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawashima, N. (1999). Distribution of the arts: British arts centres as “gatekeepers” in intersecting cultural production systems. Poetics, 26, 263-283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kealy, E. R. (1979). From craft to art: The case of sound mixers and popular music. Work and Occupations, 6, 3-29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keith, M. C. (1996). The radio station. Boston: Focal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, J. (1991). Radio waves: Life and revolution on the FM dial. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leblebici, H., Salancik, G. R., Copay, A., & King, T. (1991). Institutional change and the transformation of interorganizational fields: An organizational history of the U.S. radio broadcasting industry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 333-364.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacFarland, D. T. (1997). Future radio programming strategies: Cultivating listenership in the digital age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (1992). From radio libres to radio privees: The rapid triumph of commercial networks in French local radio. Media, Culture and Society, 14, 261-279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muggleton, D. (2000). Inside subculture: The postmodern meaning of style. New York: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negus, K. (1992). Producing pop: Culture and conflict in the popular music industry. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negus, K. (1993). Plugging and programming: Pop radio and record promotion in Britain and the United States. Popular Music, 12, 57-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negus, K. (1998). Cultural production and the corporation: Musical genres and the strategic management of creativity in the U.S. recording industry. Media, Culture and Society, 20, 359-379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negus, K. (1999). Music genres and corporate cultures. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norberg, E. (1996). Radio programming: Tactics and strategy. Boston: Focal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, K. (1997). The distribution and dynamics of uncertainty in art galleries: A case study of new dealerships in the Parisian art market, 1985-1990. Poetics, 25, 241-263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. A. (1978). The production of cultural change: The case of contemporary country music. Social Research, 45, 292-314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. A. (1993). The battle for classical music on the air. In J. Huggins Balfe (Ed.), Paying the piper: Causes and consequences of art patronage (pp. 271-286). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R. A., & Ryan, J. (1983). Success, failure, and anomie in arts and crafts work: Breaking into commercial country music songwriting. Research in Sociology of Work: Peripheral Workers, 2, 301-323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W. W. (1978). Publishers' decision-making: What criteria do they use in deciding which books to publish? Social Research, 45, 227-252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblum, B. (1978). Style as social process. American Sociological Review, 43, 422-438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. (1997). Music radio-The fickleness of fragmentation. In E. C. Pease & E. E. Dennis (Eds.), Radio: The forgotten medium (pp. 95-103). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothenbuhler, E. (1985). Programming decision making in popular music radio. Communication Research, 12, 209-232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothenbuhler, E. (1987). Commercial radio and popular music: Processes of selection and factors of influence. In J. Lull (Ed.), Popular music and communication (pp. 78-95). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothenbuhler, E., & McCourt, T. (1992). Commercial radio and popular music: Processes of selection and factors of influence. In J. Lull (Ed.), Popular music and communication, 2nd edition (pp. 97-114). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, J., & Peterson, R. A. (1982). The product image: The fate of creativity in country music songwriting. Sage Annual Reviews of Communication Research, 10, 11-32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrum, W. (1991). Critics and publics: Cultural mediation in highbrow and popular performing arts. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 347-75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklar, R. (1984). Rocking America: How the all-hit radio stations took over. New York: St. Martin's Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958-1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 801-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1995). Popular contention in Great Britain, 1758-1834. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, G. (1993). Who killed the radio star? The death of teen radio in Australia. In T. Bennett, S. Frith, L. Grossberg, J. Shepard, & G. Turner (Eds.), Rock and popular music: Politics, policies, institutions (pp. 142-155). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vignolle, J. P. (1980). Mixing genres and reaching the public: The poduction of popular music. Social Science Information, 19, 79-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, R., & Malm, K. (1993). From state monopoly to commercial oligopoly: European broadcasting policies and popular music output over the airwaves. In T. Bennett, S. Frith, L. Grossberg, J. Shepard, & G. Turner (Eds.), Rock and popular music: Politics, policies, institutions (pp. 156-168). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1949). The methodology of the social sciences. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jarl A. Ahlkvist.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ahlkvist, J.A., Faulkner, R. “Will This Record Work for Us?”: Managing Music Formats in Commercial Radio. Qualitative Sociology 25, 189–215 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015494716804

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015494716804

Navigation